Wallabies v France 3
-
I don’t think it should be but I’m surprised how many are surprised, there’s a whole thread where it explains contact to the head starts as red
@kiwiwomble said in Wallabies v France 3:
I don’t think it should be but I’m surprised how many are surprised, there’s a whole thread where it explains contact to the head starts as red
Yes, you can argue whether there's enough mitigation to go down from red to yellow, but if first contact is with the head, it always starts at red.
Also, a while ago, I've seen a medical explanation why a player can have a slightly delayed reaction to head contact. So the French player may not have been acting there. It may have been a delayed response. I wish I could remember where I've read it ...
-
@machpants said in Wallabies v France 3:
Is this under the 20 minute red, or?
Nope. NH teams voted it down.
-
@akan004 said in Wallabies v France 3:
I think red is fair enough. There was direct contact to the head with force.
Mitigation. Why not just duck your head into every tackle?
@nta said in Wallabies v France 3:
@akan004 said in Wallabies v France 3:
I think red is fair enough. There was direct contact to the head with force.
Mitigation.
Exactly Yelllow maybe,not fucking Red.
-
Do I bother watching note?
BOK is a shit ref,I might add. The first counter ruck from France was clearly in the side.
We're fucked tho
-
@machpants nup. World Rugby won't have it because England and France didn't want it
-
@machpants said in Wallabies v France 3:
Is this under the 20 minute red, or?
Nope. NH teams voted it down.
@kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:
@machpants said in Wallabies v France 3:
Is this under the 20 minute red, or?
Nope. NH teams voted it down.
Bugger
French nine there, elbow intimate neck, red card
-
That's not even a penalty...
-
@machpants said in Wallabies v France 3:
Is this under the 20 minute red, or?
Nope. NH teams voted it down.
@kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:
@machpants said in Wallabies v France 3:
Is this under the 20 minute red, or?
Nope. NH teams voted it down.
We can see why,they have to beat us somehow.
-
@kiwiwomble said in Wallabies v France 3:
I don’t think it should be but I’m surprised how many are surprised, there’s a whole thread where it explains contact to the head starts as red
Yes, you can argue whether there's enough mitigation to go down from red to yellow, but if first contact is with the head, it always starts at red.
Also, a while ago, I've seen a medical explanation why a player can have a slightly delayed reaction to head contact. So the French player may not have been acting there. It may have been a delayed response. I wish I could remember where I've read it ...
@stargazer said in Wallabies v France 3:
@kiwiwomble said in Wallabies v France 3:
I don’t think it should be but I’m surprised how many are surprised, there’s a whole thread where it explains contact to the head starts as red
Yes, you can argue whether there's enough mitigation to go down from red to yellow, but if first contact is with the head, it always starts at red.
Also, a while ago, I've seen a medical explanation why a player can have a slightly delayed reaction to head contact. So the French player may not have been acting there. It may have been a delayed response. I wish I could remember where I've read it ...
I do think it should be an automatic HIA though, we’re saying it’s unsafe…so make sure
-
@kev bullshit, the French player dropped his head.
@canes4life said in Wallabies v France 3:
@kev bullshit, the French player dropped his head.
Everyone needs to adjust technique. Was always high. Concussions kill. Contact sports have to take this stuff seriously.
-
@kiwiwomble said in Wallabies v France 3:
I don’t think it should be but I’m surprised how many are surprised, there’s a whole thread where it explains contact to the head starts as red
Yes, you can argue whether there's enough mitigation to go down from red to yellow, but if first contact is with the head, it always starts at red.
Also, a while ago, I've seen a medical explanation why a player can have a slightly delayed reaction to head contact. So the French player may not have been acting there. It may have been a delayed response. I wish I could remember where I've read it ...
@stargazer said in Wallabies v France 3:
@kiwiwomble said in Wallabies v France 3:
I don’t think it should be but I’m surprised how many are surprised, there’s a whole thread where it explains contact to the head starts as red
Yes, you can argue whether there's enough mitigation to go down from red to yellow, but if first contact is with the head, it always starts at red.
Also, a while ago, I've seen a medical explanation why a player can have a slightly delayed reaction to head contact. So the French player may not have been acting there. It may have been a delayed response. I wish I could remember where I've read it ...
It was the way he held his nose
-
@kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:
@machpants said in Wallabies v France 3:
Is this under the 20 minute red, or?
Nope. NH teams voted it down.
Bugger
French nine there, elbow intimate neck, red card
@machpants said in Wallabies v France 3:
@kirwan said in Wallabies v France 3:
@machpants said in Wallabies v France 3:
Is this under the 20 minute red, or?
Nope. NH teams voted it down.
Bugger
French nine there, elbow intimate neck, red card
Technically it should be at least yellow. But who can expect rules to implemented consistently
-
@nta don’t underestimate France finding a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Keep watching mate.
@act-crusader said in Wallabies v France 3:
@nta don’t underestimate France finding a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Keep watching mate.
I'm more concerned with my blood pressure, watching BOK fuck up for another 70 minutes
-
I don’t see this as very different to the hit on dmac…that everyone was calling to be a card
To be clear that should have been under the rules as this was
-
Stagnant Aussie backline. Players receiving the ball flat footed.
