Wallabies vs Springboks I
-
All the officials need to look at the green scrum - feet are way too far back and they're not chasing up
-
Quade lining up in front for the penalty.
Oz lead 16-11.
-
@kirwan I cannot see how no 5 collapse the maul. If he is part of the maul and legal. He is allowed to tackle the ball carrier. So I'm confused how it's even a penalty
@rebound said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@kirwan I cannot see how no 5 collapse the maul. If he is part of the maul and legal. He is allowed to tackle the ball carrier. So I'm confused how it's even a penalty
Nope. Can't end a maul with a tackle
-
@delicatessen said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
What's quade done so far? Haven't seen much good or bad
His chip lead directly to the try, he's doing well
@machpants said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@delicatessen said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
What's quade done so far? Haven't seen much good or bad
His chip lead directly to the try, he's doing well
OK didn't see that. Dodgy streams
-
What a kick
-
@chris with these tactics I really hope we put the Boks to the sword.
@canes4life said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@chris with these tactics I really hope we put the Boks to the sword.
Yep me too shit rugby by the Boks,well really playing no rugby.
-
Not all bad for oz, time used
-
Aussie one man down are taking quick throws while the Springboks are slowing it down with marks. Seems a bit backwards
@anonymous said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
Aussie one man down are taking quick throws while the Springboks are slowing it down with marks. Seems a bit backwards
Boks don't play set piece fast.
-
@rebound said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@kirwan I cannot see how no 5 collapse the maul. If he is part of the maul and legal. He is allowed to tackle the ball carrier. So I'm confused how it's even a penalty
Nope. Can't end a maul with a tackle
@nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@rebound said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@kirwan I cannot see how no 5 collapse the maul. If he is part of the maul and legal. He is allowed to tackle the ball carrier. So I'm confused how it's even a penalty
Nope. Can't end a maul with a tackle
Maybe confused by the sack law in the line out?
-
@nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@rebound said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@kirwan I cannot see how no 5 collapse the maul. If he is part of the maul and legal. He is allowed to tackle the ball carrier. So I'm confused how it's even a penalty
Nope. Can't end a maul with a tackle
Maybe confused by the sack law in the line out?
@kirwan said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@rebound said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@kirwan I cannot see how no 5 collapse the maul. If he is part of the maul and legal. He is allowed to tackle the ball carrier. So I'm confused how it's even a penalty
Nope. Can't end a maul with a tackle
Maybe confused by the sack law in the line out?
Could be. Sack can't occur after maul called of course
