Wallabies vs Springboks I
-
@anonymous said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
Aussie one man down are taking quick throws while the Springboks are slowing it down with marks. Seems a bit backwards
Boks don't play set piece fast.
-
@nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@rebound said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@kirwan I cannot see how no 5 collapse the maul. If he is part of the maul and legal. He is allowed to tackle the ball carrier. So I'm confused how it's even a penalty
Nope. Can't end a maul with a tackle
Maybe confused by the sack law in the line out?
-
@kirwan said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@nta said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@rebound said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
@kirwan I cannot see how no 5 collapse the maul. If he is part of the maul and legal. He is allowed to tackle the ball carrier. So I'm confused how it's even a penalty
Nope. Can't end a maul with a tackle
Maybe confused by the sack law in the line out?
Could be. Sack can't occur after maul called of course
-
@canes4life said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
More kicks than AFL
Nothing wrong with a team playing to their strengths. And we also kick, a lot.
-
Oz back to 15 and with an attacking LO to come.
-
Aus have done well down a man
-
they've been writing Super Cooper in the online australian news already so the Wallabies better do well or there'll be egg on face alround.
-
@booboo said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
16 - 11 Aus if anyone is wondering
Good on you, but surely this is the worst place on the net to follow if you don't have live pictures
-
Arghhhhhh
Oz cough it up 5m out.
Some excellent attack from Oz
-
Boks had to be a mile offside after the initial break up the middle
-
@kirwan if you like watching that shit. I certainly don’t.
-
@no-quarter said in Wallabies vs Springboks I:
Boks had to be a mile offside after the initial break up the middle
Out wide they were way offside I thought.
