Blues v Highlanders
-
-
@dice It would have been easier to contain, for sure, because the players had no contact with family and friends in Queenstown and could minimize contact with outsiders. Since their return home, they run the risk of getting infected via partners, children and friends.
-
@dice said in Blues v Highlanders:
Was leaving Queenstown a mistake?
It was very badly done, lets go into a bubble and leave just as cases are reaching peak in Auckland and will be getting there elsewhere over the next few weeks. But there was obvs no appetite in the players to go into a bubble, maybe ‘cos they’re thinking long term and the Trans- Ta$man games will almost certainly al be in Oz
-
@tim said in Blues v Highlanders:
So, who is the player the Blues can least afford to lose?
I'd say Christie. Every other player has a reasonable stand in, but the drop to Nock based on recent form is game altering.
-
Are there extended squads this year (and since the bubble)? It seems like an obvious need and I assumed they'd have allowed teams to have more players on the books.
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
Are there extended squads this year (and since the bubble)? It seems like an obvious need and I assumed they'd have allowed teams to have more players on the books.
The WTG is usually large (10-15 players) but that was clearly not enough for the Hurricanes.
-
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
Are there extended squads this year (and since the bubble)? It seems like an obvious need and I assumed they'd have allowed teams to have more players on the books.
The WTG is usually large (10-15 players) but that was clearly not enough for the Hurricanes.
@bovidae said in Blues v Highlanders:
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
Are there extended squads this year (and since the bubble)? It seems like an obvious need and I assumed they'd have allowed teams to have more players on the books.
The WTG is usually large (10-15 players) but that was clearly not enough for the Hurricanes.
I guess it has to be bad in certain positions, like front row. A few out there and you just can’t safely play
-
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
Are there extended squads this year (and since the bubble)? It seems like an obvious need and I assumed they'd have allowed teams to have more players on the books.
The WTG is usually large (10-15 players) but that was clearly not enough for the Hurricanes.
-
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
Are there extended squads this year (and since the bubble)? It seems like an obvious need and I assumed they'd have allowed teams to have more players on the books.
The WTG is usually large (10-15 players) but that was clearly not enough for the Hurricanes.
@bovidae said in Blues v Highlanders:
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
Are there extended squads this year (and since the bubble)? It seems like an obvious need and I assumed they'd have allowed teams to have more players on the books.
The WTG is usually large (10-15 players) but that was clearly not enough for the Hurricanes.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that it might have been a good idea to have a wider training squad, and probably a rotating WTG ready as backups for teams if they got caught short (or, the ability for teams to call up WTG players from other teams).
-
@bovidae said in Blues v Highlanders:
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
Are there extended squads this year (and since the bubble)? It seems like an obvious need and I assumed they'd have allowed teams to have more players on the books.
The WTG is usually large (10-15 players) but that was clearly not enough for the Hurricanes.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that it might have been a good idea to have a wider training squad, and probably a rotating WTG ready as backups for teams if they got caught short (or, the ability for teams to call up WTG players from other teams).
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
@bovidae said in Blues v Highlanders:
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
Are there extended squads this year (and since the bubble)? It seems like an obvious need and I assumed they'd have allowed teams to have more players on the books.
The WTG is usually large (10-15 players) but that was clearly not enough for the Hurricanes.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that it might have been a good idea to have a wider training squad, and probably a rotating WTG ready as backups for teams if they got caught short (or, the ability for teams to call up WTG players from other teams).
Isn't that already happening eg Coombes-Fabling moving from Chiefs WTG to Highlanders playing?
-
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
@bovidae said in Blues v Highlanders:
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
Are there extended squads this year (and since the bubble)? It seems like an obvious need and I assumed they'd have allowed teams to have more players on the books.
The WTG is usually large (10-15 players) but that was clearly not enough for the Hurricanes.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that it might have been a good idea to have a wider training squad, and probably a rotating WTG ready as backups for teams if they got caught short (or, the ability for teams to call up WTG players from other teams).
Isn't that already happening eg Coombes-Fabling moving from Chiefs WTG to Highlanders playing?
@crucial said in Blues v Highlanders:
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
@bovidae said in Blues v Highlanders:
@gt12 said in Blues v Highlanders:
Are there extended squads this year (and since the bubble)? It seems like an obvious need and I assumed they'd have allowed teams to have more players on the books.
The WTG is usually large (10-15 players) but that was clearly not enough for the Hurricanes.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that it might have been a good idea to have a wider training squad, and probably a rotating WTG ready as backups for teams if they got caught short (or, the ability for teams to call up WTG players from other teams).
Isn't that already happening eg Coombes-Fabling moving from Chiefs WTG to Highlanders playing?
I thought so, which is why I don't get why teams like the Canes (who had heaps of time) aren't calling in players from other squads, I guess it's not being used in that way (which I understand, but it might have been better if they has set up some type of system).
-
Early reports indicated that the franchise had at least one player test positive on Thursday evening and by Friday several other cases had been detected.
-
@tim said in Blues v Highlanders:
So, who is the player the Blues can least afford to lose?
I'd say Christie. Every other player has a reasonable stand in, but the drop to Nock based on recent form is game altering.
@antipodean said in Blues v Highlanders:
@tim said in Blues v Highlanders:
So, who is the player the Blues can least afford to lose?
I'd say Christie. Every other player has a reasonable stand in, but the drop to Nock based on recent form is game altering.
I agree
the question isn't who's best, it's where the biggest step down is. I am a massive Nock fan, but he is nowheere near his best form this year.
-
@antipodean said in Blues v Highlanders:
@tim said in Blues v Highlanders:
So, who is the player the Blues can least afford to lose?
I'd say Christie. Every other player has a reasonable stand in, but the drop to Nock based on recent form is game altering.
I agree
the question isn't who's best, it's where the biggest step down is. I am a massive Nock fan, but he is nowheere near his best form this year.
