Waratahs v Crusaders
-
Clear PT. Tahs 8 is offside.
-
Materas leg under that one...but the 8 should get YC at least
-
@Mattasaurus said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
@Kirwan I think Fossies boys are going to learn some hard lessons in July.. Particularly up front
He doesn't have to pick the Canta-blacks.
@KiwiMurph said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
@Mattasaurus said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
@Kirwan I think Fossies boys are going to learn some hard lessons in July.. Particularly up front
He doesn't have to pick the Canta-blacks.
Yeah the loyalty to some players is detrimental to the wider team in my opinion..
-
I dunno
That maul has broken off with no Tahs players in it. I am not sure but I think maybe it's play on.
@Damo said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
I dunno
That maul has broken off with no Tahs players in it. I am not sure but I think maybe it's play on.
Yeah, you could argue Matera has unbound there but I think it is the right call. Tough for the Tahs that they get the double punishment.
-
These commentators have no fucking idea of the laws. How are these retards employed?
@antipodean said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
These commentators have no fucking idea of the laws. How are these retards employed?
Do any commentators?
-
Hall need to work his pack better there
-
@Damo said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
I dunno
That maul has broken off with no Tahs players in it. I am not sure but I think maybe it's play on.
Yeah, you could argue Matera has unbound there but I think it is the right call. Tough for the Tahs that they get the double punishment.
@hydro11 said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
@Damo said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
I dunno
That maul has broken off with no Tahs players in it. I am not sure but I think maybe it's play on.
Yeah, you could argue Matera has unbound there but I think it is the right call. Tough for the Tahs that they get the double punishment.
I can go with the refs call. I just think there was a split second when the Crusaders split off with no opposition attached.
| agree that if it was the same maul then it had to be a PT and YC.
-
Painful Aussies... They would have been crowing for it if the roles were reversed
@Mattasaurus said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
Painful Aussies... They would have been crowing for it if the roles were reversed
All game they have been talking up the Crusaders
-
@Damo said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
I dunno
That maul has broken off with no Tahs players in it. I am not sure but I think maybe it's play on.
Yeah, you could argue Matera has unbound there but I think it is the right call. Tough for the Tahs that they get the double punishment.
@hydro11 said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
@Damo said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
I dunno
That maul has broken off with no Tahs players in it. I am not sure but I think maybe it's play on.
Yeah, you could argue Matera has unbound there but I think it is the right call. Tough for the Tahs that they get the double punishment.
A maul doesn't end just because there's no defenders.
-
@hydro11 said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
@Damo said in Waratahs v Crusaders:
I dunno
That maul has broken off with no Tahs players in it. I am not sure but I think maybe it's play on.
Yeah, you could argue Matera has unbound there but I think it is the right call. Tough for the Tahs that they get the double punishment.
A maul doesn't end just because there's no defenders.
@antipodean plus the 8 joined the end the fell off and then came in the side
