Chiefs v Force
-
@Machpants said in Chiefs v Force:
Cane looks bad
He has had a lot of bad luck with injuries. I hope this isn't too serious. Looks bad but at least he's up now.
@Damo said in Chiefs v Force:
@Machpants said in Chiefs v Force:
Cane looks bad
He has had a lot of bad luck with injuries. I hope this isn't too serious. Looks bad but at least he's up now.
And off, ACL, MCL?
-
@Machpants cheap shots at the knees like that should be red carded and thrown the book at. The Force player literally entered from Chiefs side of the ruck and ol ref missed it
-
Canes injury was from an illegal entry and a lower limb clean out (new law clampdown). Silence from the refs.
@Crucial said in Chiefs v Force:
Canes injury was from an illegal entry and a lower limb clean out (new law clampdown). Silence from the refs.
That's what I thought too, but is it only lifting?
Edit "‘A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs."
-
@Crucial said in Chiefs v Force:
Canes injury was from an illegal entry and a lower limb clean out (new law clampdown). Silence from the refs.
That's what I thought too, but is it only lifting?
Edit "‘A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs."
@Machpants said in Chiefs v Force:
@Crucial said in Chiefs v Force:
Canes injury was from an illegal entry and a lower limb clean out (new law clampdown). Silence from the refs.
That's what I thought too, but is it only lifting?
GLOBAL LAW TRIAL
A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.
-
@Machpants said in Chiefs v Force:
@Crucial said in Chiefs v Force:
Canes injury was from an illegal entry and a lower limb clean out (new law clampdown). Silence from the refs.
That's what I thought too, but is it only lifting?
GLOBAL LAW TRIAL
A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.
@Crucial said in Chiefs v Force:
@Machpants said in Chiefs v Force:
@Crucial said in Chiefs v Force:
Canes injury was from an illegal entry and a lower limb clean out (new law clampdown). Silence from the refs.
That's what I thought too, but is it only lifting?
GLOBAL LAW TRIAL
A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.
Yeah, certainly a penalty if nothing else
-
@Crucial said in Chiefs v Force:
@Machpants said in Chiefs v Force:
@Crucial said in Chiefs v Force:
Canes injury was from an illegal entry and a lower limb clean out (new law clampdown). Silence from the refs.
That's what I thought too, but is it only lifting?
GLOBAL LAW TRIAL
A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.
Yeah, certainly a penalty if nothing else
@Machpants said in Chiefs v Force:
@Crucial said in Chiefs v Force:
@Machpants said in Chiefs v Force:
@Crucial said in Chiefs v Force:
Canes injury was from an illegal entry and a lower limb clean out (new law clampdown). Silence from the refs.
That's what I thought too, but is it only lifting?
GLOBAL LAW TRIAL
A player may lever the jackler out of the contest at the ruck but must not drop their weight onto them or target the lower limbs.
Yeah, certainly a penalty if nothing else
Two penalties
-
@Machpants said in Chiefs v Force:
Nice work by Quinn!
The Force are a bit shit. However, that power was pretty nice.
-
@Machpants said in Chiefs v Force:
Nice work by Quinn!
The Force are a bit shit. However, that power was pretty nice.
@gt12 said in Chiefs v Force:
@Machpants said in Chiefs v Force:
Nice work by Quinn!
The Force are a bit shit. However, that power was pretty nice.
Impressed by how he tidied up the loose ball as well. Smart rugby.
-
@Yeetyaah said in Chiefs v Force:
Fuck I'm sick of Tiatia
What did he do there? Are you watching on delay?
