SF Blues v Brumbies

[hydro11]

Brumbies should have taken the 3, again.

[mariner4life]

Thr little jink step got the tacklers head in the wrong place. Head to.either side where he aimed that's not a penalty

Funny old game

[Yeetyaah]

Fuck sake Blues need the W I'll be fucked it I'm supporting the Brumbies next week

[taniwharugby]

It isn't foul play, it is an accidental head contact.

[gt12]

I’m supporting them, but the Blues kind of deserve to lose this.

I don’t think either of these teams will beat the Saders.

[ACT Crusader]

@chimoaus said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

Where are the Saders fans at the moment.

Right here

[Nepia]

How is a head clash "foul" play? Fair enough if they want to say it's reckless but there's no intent there, their heads just lined up - the actual tackle was below the shoulders.

[akan004]

Blues have let them back in due to their stupidity. Annoying.

[Donsteppa]

Brumbies will still find a way to not cross the line...

[Machpants]

How can the brumbies join in front of the fucking ball carrier

[Nepia]

@Machpants said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

How can the brumbies join in front of the fucking ball carrier

There seems to be a special set of Brumbies maul laws.

[gt12]

@Machpants said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

How can the brumbies join in front of the fucking ball carrier

Absolutely. What the fuck was that?

[ACT Crusader]

@Donsteppa said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

Brumbies will still find a way to not cross the line...

Yep.

[Gunner]

Give them a thousand chances at getting their static maul moving why don’t you O’fucking’keefe.

[taniwharugby]

@Machpants yeah if the defending player does it, pen, but attacking team is allowed.

Fickle rule

[Donsteppa]

@ACT-Crusader said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

@Donsteppa said in SF Blues v Brumbies:

Brumbies will still find a way to not cross the line...

Yep.

Oops, I was counting on Big Ginge to contest that lineout.

[Machpants]

Again people hasn't off the mail. Just fucking get in there, it isn't going anywhere

[mariner4life]

The reason is your "reffing" of the maul mate.

[Crucial]

Is there head contact? And Is there foul play? are two separate questions.
Why is it treated that one equals the other?
The refs always say “there was head contact so it’s foul”

[Bones]

Not a problem at all. Plug it deep off the kick off, any ball back goes high into the 22.