Pumas v Wallabies 2
-
@nostrildamus said in Pumas v Wallabies 2:
@Bones said in Pumas v Wallabies 2:
Juan 'redcard' Imhoff and Wylie 'Coyote' Human are the wingers in my best names XV.
Suggested nicknames for you
I think we'll take our business elsewhere, but thanks for the offer...
@Bones said in Pumas v Wallabies 2:
@nostrildamus said in Pumas v Wallabies 2:
@Bones said in Pumas v Wallabies 2:
Juan 'redcard' Imhoff and Wylie 'Coyote' Human are the wingers in my best names XV.
Suggested nicknames for you
I think we'll take our business elsewhere, but thanks for the offer...
Good. You don't pay me enough.
-
Some very dubious reffing in favour of Argentina, but they were deserved winners
@MiketheSnow said in Pumas v Wallabies 2:
Some very dubious reffing in favour of Argentina, but they were deserved winners
Agree. We were immature and impatient.
But the refs will be having a couple of "oh shit" moments during their review. Overall I thought Dickson was decisive and fairly good.
-
What's with that Stan thing of four pundits standing around a big screen in the post match? Looks so awkward.
If you want something different to talking heads at a desk give them some furniture and the option of a bevvy Graeme Norton style and let the real opinions flow.
-
It's instructive to me how little I see Wallaby supporters discussing this result.
-
It's instructive to me how little I see Wallaby supporters discussing this result.
@antipodean said in Pumas v Wallabies 2:
It's instructive to me how little I see Wallaby supporters discussing this result.
Pretty sure all the Wallabies supporters frequenting on this forum have.
But yeah out in public? Not much.
-
Quite interesting how the wallabies played like France, off the nine. Ten was rarely actually first receiver, 9 made all the play.
Doesn't seem too work as well as it did for France, tho!
@Machpants said in Pumas v Wallabies 2:
Quite interesting how the wallabies played like France, off the nine. Ten was rarely actually first receiver, 9 made all the play.
Doesn't seem too work as well as it did for France, tho!
I haven’t watched but why would you do that when JOC is 10? Like our mate Quadey from Tokoroa, JOC is a playmaker first and foremost. The type of 10 that is always looking to set someone through a hole or a wide gap and if it isn’t there put the ball into space.
-
@Machpants said in Pumas v Wallabies 2:
Quite interesting how the wallabies played like France, off the nine. Ten was rarely actually first receiver, 9 made all the play.
Doesn't seem too work as well as it did for France, tho!
I haven’t watched but why would you do that when JOC is 10? Like our mate Quadey from Tokoroa, JOC is a playmaker first and foremost. The type of 10 that is always looking to set someone through a hole or a wide gap and if it isn’t there put the ball into space.
@Crucial said in Pumas v Wallabies 2:
@Machpants said in Pumas v Wallabies 2:
Quite interesting how the wallabies played like France, off the nine. Ten was rarely actually first receiver, 9 made all the play.
Doesn't seem too work as well as it did for France, tho!
I haven’t watched but why would you do that when JOC is 10? Like our mate Quadey from Tokoroa, JOC is a playmaker first and foremost. The type of 10 that is always looking to set someone through a hole or a wide gap and if it isn’t there put the ball into space.
Yeah it is a bit bizarre, it was mentioned in the Roar he took the ball as first receiver 3 times all game
-
Just watched the highlights - knowing the winner, and that it was by a decent amount. But... fuck... did not expect THAT.
I was expecting an Argie score in the high-20s, early 30s. But... 48? WTAF?
Skimming through the thread, it seems like the ref might have been working on the promise of 1 or 2 argentina senoritas for evening entertainment? Deserved result, but not the "blow"-out the scoreline suggests?
