SF Wellington v Auckland
-
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
So who cares if he can't throw ...
Right! Probably not any worse than Taylor...
I hate how you remember stuff ...
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
So who cares if he can't throw ...
Right! Probably not any worse than Taylor...
I hate how you remember stuff ...
Remember Taylor has been rubbish at throwing the last year or so and showing no improvement? That's about the extent of it. If we're gonna lose lineouts I'd at least like the player to make up for it around the field.
-
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
So who cares if he can't throw ...
Right! Probably not any worse than Taylor...
I hate how you remember stuff ...
And he was excellent. Still my MOTM.
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
So who cares if he can't throw ...
Right! Probably not any worse than Taylor...
I hate how you remember stuff ...
And he was excellent. Still my MOTM.
Not sure what you're referencing!
-
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Have I mentiononed that you should be allowed to kick free kicks to touch on the full?
Nothing stopping you from doing so

@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Have I mentiononed that you should be allowed to kick free kicks to touch on the full?
Nothing stopping you from doing so

Mentioning it or kicking it?
-
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Have I mentiononed that you should be allowed to kick free kicks to touch on the full?
Nothing stopping you from doing so

Mentioning it or kicking it?
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Have I mentiononed that you should be allowed to kick free kicks to touch on the full?
Nothing stopping you from doing so

Mentioning it or kicking it?
Both! Should be allowed to do knockdowns too though.
-
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Have I mentiononed that you should be allowed to kick free kicks to touch on the full?
Nothing stopping you from doing so

Mentioning it or kicking it?
Both! Should be allowed to do knockdowns too though.
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Have I mentiononed that you should be allowed to kick free kicks to touch on the full?
Nothing stopping you from doing so

Mentioning it or kicking it?
Both! Should be allowed to do knockdowns too though.
You are
-
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Have I mentiononed that you should be allowed to kick free kicks to touch on the full?
Nothing stopping you from doing so

Mentioning it or kicking it?
Both! Should be allowed to do knockdowns too though.
You are
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Have I mentiononed that you should be allowed to kick free kicks to touch on the full?
Nothing stopping you from doing so

Mentioning it or kicking it?
Both! Should be allowed to do knockdowns too though.
You are
Prexactly.
-
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Have I mentiononed that you should be allowed to kick free kicks to touch on the full?
Nothing stopping you from doing so

Mentioning it or kicking it?
Both! Should be allowed to do knockdowns too though.
You are
Prexactly.
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Have I mentiononed that you should be allowed to kick free kicks to touch on the full?
Nothing stopping you from doing so

Mentioning it or kicking it?
Both! Should be allowed to do knockdowns too though.
You are
Prexactly.
Do you really need me to elaborate on what I mean about being allowed to kick directly to touch from a free kick?
Do I really need to be completely literal?
Anyway ... Welly smashing this 38 - 14 , 27mins to go ...
oops 40-24
-
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Have I mentiononed that you should be allowed to kick free kicks to touch on the full?
Nothing stopping you from doing so

Mentioning it or kicking it?
Both! Should be allowed to do knockdowns too though.
You are
Prexactly.
Do you really need me to elaborate on what I mean about being allowed to kick directly to touch from a free kick?
Do I really need to be completely literal?
Anyway ... Welly smashing this 38 - 14 , 27mins to go ...
oops 40-24
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Do you really need me to elaborate on what I mean about being allowed to kick directly to touch from a free kick?
Do I really need to be completely literal?You are allowed to kick directly to touch, just as you are allowed to knockdown. I really thought you of all people would understand this concept?
-
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Do you really need me to elaborate on what I mean about being allowed to kick directly to touch from a free kick?
Do I really need to be completely literal?You are allowed to kick directly to touch, just as you are allowed to knockdown. I really thought you of all people would understand this concept?
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Do you really need me to elaborate on what I mean about being allowed to kick directly to touch from a free kick?
Do I really need to be completely literal?You are allowed to kick directly to touch, just as you are allowed to knockdown. I really thought you of all people would understand this concept?
Yep. So let me rephrase.
You should be allowed to kick directly out on the full and have the lineout at the point where the ball xrosses the touchline. Would ve happy with that amendment to the laws.
What's up with you tonight? You're usually funny...
-
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Do you really need me to elaborate on what I mean about being allowed to kick directly to touch from a free kick?
Do I really need to be completely literal?You are allowed to kick directly to touch, just as you are allowed to knockdown. I really thought you of all people would understand this concept?
Yep. So let me rephrase.
You should be allowed to kick directly out on the full and have the lineout at the point where the ball xrosses the touchline. Would ve happy with that amendment to the laws.
What's up with you tonight? You're usually funny...
-
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Do you really need me to elaborate on what I mean about being allowed to kick directly to touch from a free kick?
Do I really need to be completely literal?You are allowed to kick directly to touch, just as you are allowed to knockdown. I really thought you of all people would understand this concept?
Yep. So let me rephrase.
You should be allowed to kick directly out on the full and have the lineout at the point where the ball xrosses the touchline. Would ve happy with that amendment to the laws.
What's up with you tonight? You're usually funny...
-
Just watched this. Poor first 60 minutes from Auckland front rowers really set the scene. Vikena lacks finesse. Great effort from Harry Plummer and Patty T to keep them in it after halftime. Don't understand why Peita did not start - as the loosies were not a good unit.
A lot of the Wellington players are really flourishing. Thought JGB, Love and Blackwell were great throughout. Poor Kirifi must curse his handling, but had a busy match. I like what I see in Higgins! TJP was on fire. Aumua needs to work on his lineout work to get back in top ABs but his general play is great.
An enjoyable watch.
-
@Bones said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
@booboo said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
Do you really need me to elaborate on what I mean about being allowed to kick directly to touch from a free kick?
Do I really need to be completely literal?You are allowed to kick directly to touch, just as you are allowed to knockdown. I really thought you of all people would understand this concept?
Yep. So let me rephrase.
You should be allowed to kick directly out on the full and have the lineout at the point where the ball xrosses the touchline. Would ve happy with that amendment to the laws.
What's up with you tonight? You're usually funny...
@booboo it would be a decent change and one that would encourage less resets of scrums after free kicks...as I said earlier, I'd like a change to only allow one reset, after which the free kick must be taken, hate watching teams pack down scrums playing for penalties, or PT and YC if in opposition 22.
-
@Duluth said in SF Wellington v Auckland:
It would be embarrassing to lose after getting 26-0 lead…
Is there an aged well award? First time we hit 50 innit.