QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes
-
Cameron and Barrett look far too bloody casual tonight.
Just like last week we haven’t shown that intensity needed in these sorts of games.
-
@KiwiMurph said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Would be nice if our AB number 8 had any sort of physical impact on this game.
He did in the first 3 minutes. Not much since. He's playing out of position.
-
@KiwiMurph said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Would be nice if our AB number 8 had any sort of physical impact on this game.
Right, so the guy who has made post contact meters every time he has the ball.
-
@KiwiMurph said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Would be nice if our AB number 8 had any sort of physical impact on this game.
He did in the first 3 minutes. Not much since. He's playing out of position.
@Damo said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@KiwiMurph said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Would be nice if our AB number 8 had any sort of physical impact on this game.
He did in the first 3 minutes. Not much since. He's playing out of position.
He’s still playing in the back row, has been missing in action.
-
@KiwiMurph said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Would be nice if our AB number 8 had any sort of physical impact on this game.
Right, so the guy who has made post contact meters every time he has the ball.
@Machpants said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@KiwiMurph said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Would be nice if our AB number 8 had any sort of physical impact on this game.
Right, so the guy who has made post contact meters every time he has the ball.
All three times, for 18 metres? Ace.
-
@Kirwan that’s why Love should have started. Holland is too thick to think about that though.
@Canes4life said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@Kirwan that’s why Love should have started. Holland is too thick to think about that though.
He's part of our new AB cartel thank you....
-
This game showcases how bad Holland really is as a coach. He’s had a whole year to think about last year’s loss in Canberra and he literally hasn’t learned anything. We are literally doing the same shit and expecting different results.
-
Brumbies forwards working as a unit, Canes going in ones and twos and neglecting the tight stuff.
@Mattasaurus said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Brumbies forwards working as a unit, Canes going in ones and twos and neglecting the tight stuff.
I don't like the strategy. The one off stuff doesn't often give us the impetus we need to dominate. And forward in the backline aren't helpful
-
@Machpants said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@KiwiMurph said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Would be nice if our AB number 8 had any sort of physical impact on this game.
Right, so the guy who has made post contact meters every time he has the ball.
All three times, for 18 metres? Ace.
@Kirwan said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@Machpants said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@KiwiMurph said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Would be nice if our AB number 8 had any sort of physical impact on this game.
Right, so the guy who has made post contact meters every time he has the ball.
All three times, for 18 metres? Ace.
Post contact for 18 metres is f***en good, 2 ms post contact is the aim.
-
@Mattasaurus said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Brumbies forwards working as a unit, Canes going in ones and twos and neglecting the tight stuff.
I don't like the strategy. The one off stuff doesn't often give us the impetus we need to dominate. And forward in the backline aren't helpful
@canefan said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@Mattasaurus said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Brumbies forwards working as a unit, Canes going in ones and twos and neglecting the tight stuff.
I don't like the strategy. The one off stuff doesn't often give us the impetus we need to dominate. And forward in the backline aren't helpful
I think that's what the Canes backline needs because the backs are crabbing sideways. You need someone running direct to hold the defence.
-
@canefan said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@Mattasaurus said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Brumbies forwards working as a unit, Canes going in ones and twos and neglecting the tight stuff.
I don't like the strategy. The one off stuff doesn't often give us the impetus we need to dominate. And forward in the backline aren't helpful
I think that's what the Canes backline needs because the backs are crabbing sideways. You need someone running direct to hold the defence.
@antipodean said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@canefan said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@Mattasaurus said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Brumbies forwards working as a unit, Canes going in ones and twos and neglecting the tight stuff.
I don't like the strategy. The one off stuff doesn't often give us the impetus we need to dominate. And forward in the backline aren't helpful
I think that's what the Canes backline needs because the backs are crabbing sideways. You need someone running direct to hold the defence.
I feel like the backs have barely touched the ball. When they do get it it's often in poor position
