QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes
-
Brumbies forwards working as a unit, Canes going in ones and twos and neglecting the tight stuff.
@Mattasaurus said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Brumbies forwards working as a unit, Canes going in ones and twos and neglecting the tight stuff.
I don't like the strategy. The one off stuff doesn't often give us the impetus we need to dominate. And forward in the backline aren't helpful
-
@Machpants said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@KiwiMurph said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Would be nice if our AB number 8 had any sort of physical impact on this game.
Right, so the guy who has made post contact meters every time he has the ball.
All three times, for 18 metres? Ace.
@Kirwan said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@Machpants said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@KiwiMurph said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Would be nice if our AB number 8 had any sort of physical impact on this game.
Right, so the guy who has made post contact meters every time he has the ball.
All three times, for 18 metres? Ace.
Post contact for 18 metres is f***en good, 2 ms post contact is the aim.
-
@Mattasaurus said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Brumbies forwards working as a unit, Canes going in ones and twos and neglecting the tight stuff.
I don't like the strategy. The one off stuff doesn't often give us the impetus we need to dominate. And forward in the backline aren't helpful
@canefan said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@Mattasaurus said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Brumbies forwards working as a unit, Canes going in ones and twos and neglecting the tight stuff.
I don't like the strategy. The one off stuff doesn't often give us the impetus we need to dominate. And forward in the backline aren't helpful
I think that's what the Canes backline needs because the backs are crabbing sideways. You need someone running direct to hold the defence.
-
@canefan said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@Mattasaurus said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Brumbies forwards working as a unit, Canes going in ones and twos and neglecting the tight stuff.
I don't like the strategy. The one off stuff doesn't often give us the impetus we need to dominate. And forward in the backline aren't helpful
I think that's what the Canes backline needs because the backs are crabbing sideways. You need someone running direct to hold the defence.
@antipodean said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@canefan said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@Mattasaurus said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Brumbies forwards working as a unit, Canes going in ones and twos and neglecting the tight stuff.
I don't like the strategy. The one off stuff doesn't often give us the impetus we need to dominate. And forward in the backline aren't helpful
I think that's what the Canes backline needs because the backs are crabbing sideways. You need someone running direct to hold the defence.
I feel like the backs have barely touched the ball. When they do get it it's often in poor position
-
Badly in need of a Roigard snipe and try.
-
Barrett and Cameron aren’t running onto the ball. They are literally both standing still and shoveling the ball.
-
@Machpants said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
How was nick white able to be taken out there? Ref is wank
Nic Berry master of inconsistentcy
-
Yes A Savea
-
@Machpants said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
Fuck those Ardie doubters
A very PGS like performance so far.
