Wellington v Hawkes (RS)
-
Walker-Leawere was early suspended for having weed in his system... how long does cocaine last in your system? Presumably several Magpies players would fail drugs tests if asked to do them after the BOP game?
@frugby not long 12-24hours if not a frequent user maybe bit longer if they use it a lot. Hair samples which I doubt they take can basically look back for months/years if required.
-
And a Hawke's Bay player has been charged by the cops. Will be interesting to see the team Hawke's Bay name for it's nxt fixture
https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/provincial/300981347/hawkes-bay-player-charged-following-afterparty-that-saw-ranfurly-shield-broken -
im in the camp of what happens to these trophies in between games is a bit of the mystique of them, the unsubstantiated stories and urban legends, Dad worked for Air NZ in the 90's as i was lucky enough to have the ranfurly shield, NPC Div 1 trophy and the bledisloe stashed under my bed one night because they came into town on a late flight....theyve obviously be restored since then but i can tell you they we're pretty fucked up back then, the rugby ball on the lid of the bledisloe was super dented and bent over
BUT...dont bloody take photos and shit (our court sessions you have to leave your phones), the shield should have turned up for the first challenge next year looking all shiny and nothing but a rumor that "something" went down in the off season
-
Wow there are some real zingers on here. HB have poor form in this regard, after all they provided the only pitch invaders at a Wahs game that I can recall ever.
@canefan said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
Wow there are some real zingers on here. HB have poor form in this regard, after all they provided the only pitch invaders at a Wahs game that I can recall ever.
Yeah but 12 people got arrested in Wellington at the Warriors game.
I know cos @Stargazer said so.
-
@canefan said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
Wow there are some real zingers on here. HB have poor form in this regard, after all they provided the only pitch invaders at a Wahs game that I can recall ever.
Yeah but 12 people got arrested in Wellington at the Warriors game.
I know cos @Stargazer said so.
-
@MN5 no need to worry about any at hurricanes games they would require fans at the games.
@Magpie_in_aus said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
@MN5 no need to worry about any at hurricanes games they would require fans at the games.
Harsh but true.
I’m one of the worst culprits. I only went once this year and that was cos I got a free ticket.
-
"@MN5 ruins rugby"....i can see the headline now
@Kiwiwomble said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
"@MN5 ruins rugby"....i can see the headline now
Please read my post above.
Only if I got a free ticket.
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
"@MN5 ruins rugby"....i can see the headline now
Please read my post above.
Only if I got a free ticket.
"@MN5 admits....'would ruin rugby if given chance'"
-
Thats a clean break, it would have been a shoddy repair job to begin with. Dropping it on a hard surface just broke open where it was previously apart and repaired.
Im not vested in this, i just work with wood and see this all the time...carry on.
Edit: i mean wood breakages, not Coke.
carry on again
@Virgil said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
Thats a clean break, it would have been a shoddy repair job to begin with. Dropping it on a hard surface just broke open where it was previously apart and repaired.
Im not vested in this, i just work with wood and see this all the time...carry on.
Edit: i mean wood breakages, not Coke.
carry on again
I thought the recent repair was with a whole new lump of wood? (i.e., not re-splitting a previous break)
-
@Virgil said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
Thats a clean break, it would have been a shoddy repair job to begin with. Dropping it on a hard surface just broke open where it was previously apart and repaired.
Im not vested in this, i just work with wood and see this all the time...carry on.
Edit: i mean wood breakages, not Coke.
carry on again
I thought the recent repair was with a whole new lump of wood? (i.e., not re-splitting a previous break)
@booboo yeah the old log-o-wood was retired and they brought in the brand new one before Wellington defended it against Southland earlier in the season.
-
"Yes, we are,’’ Lancaster said. “It is very much about establishing what has gone on, get the shield back to Wellington so we can lay eyes on it and understand exactly what the nature of the damage is and then we will go from there.’’
Yes it should go back to Wellington
-
"Yes, we are,’’ Lancaster said. “It is very much about establishing what has gone on, get the shield back to Wellington so we can lay eyes on it and understand exactly what the nature of the damage is and then we will go from there.’’
Yes it should go back to Wellington
@Machpants said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
"Yes, we are,’’ Lancaster said. “It is very much about establishing what has gone on, get the shield back to Wellington so we can lay eyes on it and understand exactly what the nature of the damage is and then we will go from there.’’
Yes it should go back to Wellington
What, so James O'Reilly can use it to add to his list of trophies he has been fingered for using for illegal purposes?
-
Thats a clean break, it would have been a shoddy repair job to begin with. Dropping it on a hard surface just broke open where it was previously apart and repaired.
Im not vested in this, i just work with wood and see this all the time...carry on.
Edit: i mean wood breakages, not Coke.
carry on again
@Virgil said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
Thats a clean break, it would have been a shoddy repair job to begin with. Dropping it on a hard surface just broke open where it was previously apart and repaired.
Im not vested in this, i just work with wood and see this all the time...carry on.
Edit: i mean wood breakages, not Coke.
carry on again
Wasn't a repair job, the wood was brand new! They had replaced it.
-
@Machpants said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
"Yes, we are,’’ Lancaster said. “It is very much about establishing what has gone on, get the shield back to Wellington so we can lay eyes on it and understand exactly what the nature of the damage is and then we will go from there.’’
Yes it should go back to Wellington
What, so James O'Reilly can use it to add to his list of trophies he has been fingered for using for illegal purposes?
@Higgins said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
@Machpants said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
"Yes, we are,’’ Lancaster said. “It is very much about establishing what has gone on, get the shield back to Wellington so we can lay eyes on it and understand exactly what the nature of the damage is and then we will go from there.’’
Yes it should go back to Wellington
What, so James O'Reilly can use it to add to his list of trophies he has been fingered for using for illegal purposes?
At least he would clean up the white powder
-
And the other things these fluffybunnies have done? There will be a whole set of rules for any new holders because of this shit! And wouldn't it of been nice for Hawkes Bay to be able to have it on display this week as a lead in to the QFs?
And to top it off another one of the idiots decided to drive pissed into someone's fence and has been charged with drink driving !!!
-
And the other things these fluffybunnies have done? There will be a whole set of rules for any new holders because of this shit! And wouldn't it of been nice for Hawkes Bay to be able to have it on display this week as a lead in to the QFs?
And to top it off another one of the idiots decided to drive pissed into someone's fence and has been charged with drink driving !!!
@Dan54 said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
And the other things these fluffybunnies have done? There will be a whole set of rules for any new holders because of this shit! And wouldn't it of been nice for Hawkes Bay to be able to have it on display this week as a lead in to the QFs?
And to top it off another one of the idiots decided to drive pissed into someone's fence and has been charged with drink driving !!!
Rule one: Don’t break the shield.
I’d have thought this would be a given but some unions might need it in writing.
-
@Machpants said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):
"Yes, we are,’’ Lancaster said. “It is very much about establishing what has gone on, get the shield back to Wellington so we can lay eyes on it and understand exactly what the nature of the damage is and then we will go from there.’’
Yes it should go back to Wellington
What, so James O'Reilly can use it to add to his list of trophies he has been fingered for using for illegal purposes?
