Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Wellington v Hawkes (RS)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
wellingtonhawkesbay
274 Posts 45 Posters 13.7k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Dan54D Dan54

    And the other things these fluffybunnies have done? There will be a whole set of rules for any new holders because of this shit! And wouldn't it of been nice for Hawkes Bay to be able to have it on display this week as a lead in to the QFs?

    And to top it off another one of the idiots decided to drive pissed into someone's fence and has been charged with drink driving !!!

    MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #198

    @Dan54 said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

    And the other things these fluffybunnies have done? There will be a whole set of rules for any new holders because of this shit! And wouldn't it of been nice for Hawkes Bay to be able to have it on display this week as a lead in to the QFs?

    And to top it off another one of the idiots decided to drive pissed into someone's fence and has been charged with drink driving !!!

    Rule one: Don’t break the shield.

    I’d have thought this would be a given but some unions might need it in writing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
    • HigginsH Higgins

      @Machpants said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

      "Yes, we are,’’ Lancaster said. “It is very much about establishing what has gone on, get the shield back to Wellington so we can lay eyes on it and understand exactly what the nature of the damage is and then we will go from there.’’

      Yes it should go back to Wellington

      What, so James O'Reilly can use it to add to his list of trophies he has been fingered for using for illegal purposes?

      SmudgeS Offline
      SmudgeS Offline
      Smudge
      wrote on last edited by
      #199

      @Higgins check out the whataboutery from Brad!

      boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • Dan54D Offline
        Dan54D Offline
        Dan54
        wrote on last edited by
        #200

        I will add Fakatava can f*** off , posing holding the shield together etc.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • taniwharugbyT Offline
          taniwharugbyT Offline
          taniwharugby
          wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
          #201

          From Jason Pine on FB

          The damage done to the Ranfurly Shield.

          Couple of points ...

          Firstly ... how dumb do you have to be to share this stuff on social media?

          Who took the video and the photos, then thought it'd be a good idea to put them online?

          I'm at a loss to explain why you would think that's a good idea.

          To the Shield itself ... and what happened to it...

          The alleged drug-taking doesn't actually bother me that much.

          There are plenty of stories about what's allegedly been done on and around the Ranfurly Shield over the years.

          Many of those things happened in the days well before social media and cameras on every phone.

          The decision by someone to do drugs, let alone off the Ranfurly Shield, is perhaps worthy of wider discussion, but it's not the big issue here for me.

          The main issue is the damage.

          The Shield has suffered minor damage in the past ... and needed some reasonably significant restoration over the last 12 months to repair a few things.

          But it has never been BROKEN IN HALF.

          We've all seen the Ranfurly Shield ... many of us have held it up for a photo at promotional events and things like that.

          The Shield is a decent hunk of wood.

          It feels to me like you'd have to try really hard to snap it in half.

          In fact, James Dwan - whose company Tri-Peek helped replace the original piece of wood with a new solid piece of oak this year - says the new version of the shield is three to four times thicker than the original.

          He says that means it would require a lot of force to break.

          When this all came to light yesterday, those at Hawke's Bay Rugby insisted it was an accident ... and that it had been dropped on a concrete floor by mistake.

          If they stick to their story (which they are), we probably have to believe it.

          But accidents tend to happen more often when people have had a bit to drink, or (allegedly) had a bit of the other stuff.

          I'm all for celebrating success ... and winning the Ranfurly Shield is still a big deal for provincial rugby players ... and worthy of celebration.

          But before you get started on the celebrations, make a plan.

          And at the very least, keep the Ranfurly Shield out of harm's way.

          Give the Shield a minder; someone who doesn't drink, for example, or a younger squad member who has to earn his stripes ... or someone who's put in charge of keeping the Shield away from those who are celebrating the hardest, so that accidents like this don't happen.

          It's like having a sober driver ... just some sort of plan to make sure that when everyone wakes up in the morning, the Shield looks the same as when it was handed over.

          The biggest thing for me though is the underlying disrespect which led to this happening.

          The Ranfurly Shield should ... and does ... mean something significant.

          Generations of rugby players have tried ... successfully and unsuccessfully ... to win it and to keep it.

          It's without doubt the most famous trophy in NZ sport.

          And whoever was around it on Saturday night treated it like it was nothing more than a piece of wood ... and with utter contempt.

          They were laughing.

          They were laughing about breaking one of the most treasured sporting trophies in our national game.

          That completely disrespects its history ... and everyone who has been part of its legacy.

          https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02V6CxetxWPUaQfo3xrkeps9wBtmi4W6KAJh14J4xUm18WikTTcfqZACSWA5fZa1xal&id=100092547543224&mibextid=Nif5oz

          MN5M NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
          6
          • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

            From Jason Pine on FB

            The damage done to the Ranfurly Shield.

            Couple of points ...

            Firstly ... how dumb do you have to be to share this stuff on social media?

            Who took the video and the photos, then thought it'd be a good idea to put them online?

            I'm at a loss to explain why you would think that's a good idea.

            To the Shield itself ... and what happened to it...

            The alleged drug-taking doesn't actually bother me that much.

            There are plenty of stories about what's allegedly been done on and around the Ranfurly Shield over the years.

            Many of those things happened in the days well before social media and cameras on every phone.

            The decision by someone to do drugs, let alone off the Ranfurly Shield, is perhaps worthy of wider discussion, but it's not the big issue here for me.

            The main issue is the damage.

            The Shield has suffered minor damage in the past ... and needed some reasonably significant restoration over the last 12 months to repair a few things.

            But it has never been BROKEN IN HALF.

            We've all seen the Ranfurly Shield ... many of us have held it up for a photo at promotional events and things like that.

            The Shield is a decent hunk of wood.

            It feels to me like you'd have to try really hard to snap it in half.

            In fact, James Dwan - whose company Tri-Peek helped replace the original piece of wood with a new solid piece of oak this year - says the new version of the shield is three to four times thicker than the original.

            He says that means it would require a lot of force to break.

            When this all came to light yesterday, those at Hawke's Bay Rugby insisted it was an accident ... and that it had been dropped on a concrete floor by mistake.

            If they stick to their story (which they are), we probably have to believe it.

            But accidents tend to happen more often when people have had a bit to drink, or (allegedly) had a bit of the other stuff.

            I'm all for celebrating success ... and winning the Ranfurly Shield is still a big deal for provincial rugby players ... and worthy of celebration.

            But before you get started on the celebrations, make a plan.

            And at the very least, keep the Ranfurly Shield out of harm's way.

            Give the Shield a minder; someone who doesn't drink, for example, or a younger squad member who has to earn his stripes ... or someone who's put in charge of keeping the Shield away from those who are celebrating the hardest, so that accidents like this don't happen.

            It's like having a sober driver ... just some sort of plan to make sure that when everyone wakes up in the morning, the Shield looks the same as when it was handed over.

            The biggest thing for me though is the underlying disrespect which led to this happening.

            The Ranfurly Shield should ... and does ... mean something significant.

            Generations of rugby players have tried ... successfully and unsuccessfully ... to win it and to keep it.

            It's without doubt the most famous trophy in NZ sport.

            And whoever was around it on Saturday night treated it like it was nothing more than a piece of wood ... and with utter contempt.

            They were laughing.

            They were laughing about breaking one of the most treasured sporting trophies in our national game.

            That completely disrespects its history ... and everyone who has been part of its legacy.

            https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02V6CxetxWPUaQfo3xrkeps9wBtmi4W6KAJh14J4xUm18WikTTcfqZACSWA5fZa1xal&id=100092547543224&mibextid=Nif5oz

            MN5M Online
            MN5M Online
            MN5
            wrote on last edited by Duluth
            #202

            https://tenor.com/en-NZ/view/rick-james-cocaine-hell-of-a-drug-gif-16366380

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • BovidaeB Offline
              BovidaeB Offline
              Bovidae
              wrote on last edited by
              #203

              It used to be that the reserve prop (when there was only one) was the unofficial minder.

              The original RS was heavy enough so the new one must be a solid piece of wood. But obviously not solid enough...

              N 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • mikedogzM Online
                mikedogzM Online
                mikedogz
                wrote on last edited by
                #204

                image.png

                1 Reply Last reply
                8
                • Magpie_in_ausM Offline
                  Magpie_in_ausM Offline
                  Magpie_in_aus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #205

                  Putting all of this on social media really is the most stupid thing out of all of this stupidity. Up there with Val Holmes in league posting a bag of white powder in his mouth.

                  I would 100% be saying the shield is 3x thicker and stronger if I spent a year building it then it breaks in the first couple of months. At least the stupidity of the players means his story means no one is going to question it (and rightly so)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                    From Jason Pine on FB

                    The damage done to the Ranfurly Shield.

                    Couple of points ...

                    Firstly ... how dumb do you have to be to share this stuff on social media?

                    Who took the video and the photos, then thought it'd be a good idea to put them online?

                    I'm at a loss to explain why you would think that's a good idea.

                    To the Shield itself ... and what happened to it...

                    The alleged drug-taking doesn't actually bother me that much.

                    There are plenty of stories about what's allegedly been done on and around the Ranfurly Shield over the years.

                    Many of those things happened in the days well before social media and cameras on every phone.

                    The decision by someone to do drugs, let alone off the Ranfurly Shield, is perhaps worthy of wider discussion, but it's not the big issue here for me.

                    The main issue is the damage.

                    The Shield has suffered minor damage in the past ... and needed some reasonably significant restoration over the last 12 months to repair a few things.

                    But it has never been BROKEN IN HALF.

                    We've all seen the Ranfurly Shield ... many of us have held it up for a photo at promotional events and things like that.

                    The Shield is a decent hunk of wood.

                    It feels to me like you'd have to try really hard to snap it in half.

                    In fact, James Dwan - whose company Tri-Peek helped replace the original piece of wood with a new solid piece of oak this year - says the new version of the shield is three to four times thicker than the original.

                    He says that means it would require a lot of force to break.

                    When this all came to light yesterday, those at Hawke's Bay Rugby insisted it was an accident ... and that it had been dropped on a concrete floor by mistake.

                    If they stick to their story (which they are), we probably have to believe it.

                    But accidents tend to happen more often when people have had a bit to drink, or (allegedly) had a bit of the other stuff.

                    I'm all for celebrating success ... and winning the Ranfurly Shield is still a big deal for provincial rugby players ... and worthy of celebration.

                    But before you get started on the celebrations, make a plan.

                    And at the very least, keep the Ranfurly Shield out of harm's way.

                    Give the Shield a minder; someone who doesn't drink, for example, or a younger squad member who has to earn his stripes ... or someone who's put in charge of keeping the Shield away from those who are celebrating the hardest, so that accidents like this don't happen.

                    It's like having a sober driver ... just some sort of plan to make sure that when everyone wakes up in the morning, the Shield looks the same as when it was handed over.

                    The biggest thing for me though is the underlying disrespect which led to this happening.

                    The Ranfurly Shield should ... and does ... mean something significant.

                    Generations of rugby players have tried ... successfully and unsuccessfully ... to win it and to keep it.

                    It's without doubt the most famous trophy in NZ sport.

                    And whoever was around it on Saturday night treated it like it was nothing more than a piece of wood ... and with utter contempt.

                    They were laughing.

                    They were laughing about breaking one of the most treasured sporting trophies in our national game.

                    That completely disrespects its history ... and everyone who has been part of its legacy.

                    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02V6CxetxWPUaQfo3xrkeps9wBtmi4W6KAJh14J4xUm18WikTTcfqZACSWA5fZa1xal&id=100092547543224&mibextid=Nif5oz

                    NepiaN Online
                    NepiaN Online
                    Nepia
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #206

                    @taniwharugby said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                    It feels to me like you'd have to try really hard to snap it in half.

                    I'm more inclined to believe that story because of how it's clearly in two pieces with the plate part still on one. If there was an actual attempt to damage it it wouldn't split nicely into two pieces like that.

                    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Machpants
                      wrote on last edited by Machpants
                      #207

                      I find it funny that NZR is basically going to turn a blind eye to the coke all over the shield, complete with snorting tube. 'if we don't test, no one will be guilty, ergo less bad publicity'

                      NZR general manager community rugby Steve Lancaster said NZR wasn't aware that the white powder was drugs.

                      "We are aware of images that are in circulation but we don't have any information or clarification about what has taken place so we have launched an investigation to ascertain exactly what has gone on but at this stage we're at the very early stages of that.

                      NZR did ask Hawke's Bay Rugby Union if drugs were involved. Lancaster said the response was there was "no awareness on anyone's part of anything illicit taking place is what we've been told".

                      Lancaster said drug testing was an employment matter so he would not disclose whether testing of the winning players had taken place.

                      Would NZR be testing the surface of the Shield for the presence of drugs?

                      "That's not something we've contemplated at this stage, I don't know if that would be feasible or not, but [the Shield] is making its way back to us at NZR now and we'll determine the next steps once we've got our hands on it," Lancaster said.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • NepiaN Nepia

                        @taniwharugby said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                        It feels to me like you'd have to try really hard to snap it in half.

                        I'm more inclined to believe that story because of how it's clearly in two pieces with the plate part still on one. If there was an actual attempt to damage it it wouldn't split nicely into two pieces like that.

                        nzzpN Online
                        nzzpN Online
                        nzzp
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #208

                        @Nepia said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                        @taniwharugby said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                        It feels to me like you'd have to try really hard to snap it in half.

                        I'm more inclined to believe that story because of how it's clearly in two pieces with the plate part still on one. If there was an actual attempt to damage it it wouldn't split nicely into two pieces like that.

                        hidden defects are hidden defects.

                        There's a lot of pearl clutching going on (looking at you Scotty Stephenson). Socials is just stupid; damage is potentially a colossal accident, but drugs AND social media is the height of stupid.

                        Fark me.

                        Also, congrats HB - getting the Shield is a big deal.

                        Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • KiwiwombleK Offline
                          KiwiwombleK Offline
                          Kiwiwomble
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #209

                          Seeing people post about how disrespectful it is on socials…that haven’t never posted about rugby before is getting a bit tiresome

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugby
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #210

                            Breakers media team 🔥

                            FB_IMG_1696237700843.jpg

                            voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
                            12
                            • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                              Breakers media team 🔥

                              FB_IMG_1696237700843.jpg

                              voodooV Offline
                              voodooV Offline
                              voodoo
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #211

                              @taniwharugby said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                              Breakers media team 🔥

                              FB_IMG_1696237700843.jpg

                              So good 🔥😂

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • MN5M MN5

                                @voodoo said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                Pricks, though I shouldn’t be surprised.

                                HB has always just been a bogan version of Manawatu

                                I’m giving this an upvote despite the massive contradiction in terms

                                boobooB Do not disturb
                                boobooB Do not disturb
                                booboo
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #212

                                @MN5 said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                @voodoo said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                Pricks, though I shouldn’t be surprised.

                                HB has always just been a bogan version of Manawatu

                                I’m giving this an upvote despite the massive contradiction in terms

                                Tautology?

                                MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • boobooB booboo

                                  @MN5 said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                  @voodoo said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                  Pricks, though I shouldn’t be surprised.

                                  HB has always just been a bogan version of Manawatu

                                  I’m giving this an upvote despite the massive contradiction in terms

                                  Tautology?

                                  MN5M Online
                                  MN5M Online
                                  MN5
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #213

                                  @booboo said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                  @MN5 said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                  @voodoo said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                  Pricks, though I shouldn’t be surprised.

                                  HB has always just been a bogan version of Manawatu

                                  I’m giving this an upvote despite the massive contradiction in terms

                                  Tautology?

                                  I had to Google it but yes…..

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • SmudgeS Smudge

                                    @Higgins check out the whataboutery from Brad!

                                    boobooB Do not disturb
                                    boobooB Do not disturb
                                    booboo
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #214

                                    @Smudge said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                    @Higgins check out the whataboutery from Brad!

                                    Missed that Smudge. Ploise exploin?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • SmudgeS Offline
                                      SmudgeS Offline
                                      Smudge
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #215

                                      I paraphrased the "check out the big brains on Brad" line from Pulp Fiction, to help me accuse Higgins of injecting "but what about..." into the argument.

                                      Love it when I have to explain my attempts at humour.

                                      nzzpN boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
                                      4
                                      • SmudgeS Smudge

                                        I paraphrased the "check out the big brains on Brad" line from Pulp Fiction, to help me accuse Higgins of injecting "but what about..." into the argument.

                                        Love it when I have to explain my attempts at humour.

                                        nzzpN Online
                                        nzzpN Online
                                        nzzp
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #216

                                        @Smudge said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                        check out the big brains on Brad

                                        used this at the weekend. Kids looked confused, wife laughed. Success. 100%Dad.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • nzzpN nzzp

                                          @Nepia said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                          @taniwharugby said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                          It feels to me like you'd have to try really hard to snap it in half.

                                          I'm more inclined to believe that story because of how it's clearly in two pieces with the plate part still on one. If there was an actual attempt to damage it it wouldn't split nicely into two pieces like that.

                                          hidden defects are hidden defects.

                                          There's a lot of pearl clutching going on (looking at you Scotty Stephenson). Socials is just stupid; damage is potentially a colossal accident, but drugs AND social media is the height of stupid.

                                          Fark me.

                                          Also, congrats HB - getting the Shield is a big deal.

                                          Dan54D Offline
                                          Dan54D Offline
                                          Dan54
                                          wrote on last edited by Dan54
                                          #217

                                          @nzzp said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                          @Nepia said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                          @taniwharugby said in Wellington v Hawkes (RS):

                                          It feels to me like you'd have to try really hard to snap it in half.

                                          I'm more inclined to believe that story because of how it's clearly in two pieces with the plate part still on one. If there was an actual attempt to damage it it wouldn't split nicely into two pieces like that.

                                          hidden defects are hidden defects.

                                          There's a lot of pearl clutching going on (looking at you Scotty Stephenson). Socials is just stupid; damage is potentially a colossal accident, but drugs AND social media is the height of stupid.

                                          Fark me.

                                          Also, congrats HB - getting the Shield is a big deal.

                                          Mate I make no apologies for saying how pissed I am that the shield was left in possession of someone who didn't take care of it.
                                          I do admit the social media etc pissed me off the most (as did Scotty Stevenson if you heard him) . I can understand EVEN if it was an accident by a sober person if they then grabbed it put it away and contacted the HBRU straight away, rather than hearing laughing etc going on about it.
                                          See I not into just shrugging shoulders and saying they young men celebrating, thats, how you end up with players getting caught driving pissed etc, and shit being bought on game.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search