RWC SF: England v Springboks
-
Was stupid to select reserves props who can't scrum against a team like SA, and in a game like this where there were plenty of stoppages, there was no need to bring them on so early. Borthwick fucked up.
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Was stupid to select reserves props who can't scrum against a team like SA, and in a game like this where there were plenty of stoppages, there was no need to bring them on so early. Borthwick fucked up.
We don’t have any props who can scrummage! Why do you think dads army were there in the first place. Blame the Premiership not the coach
-
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Was stupid to select reserves props who can't scrum against a team like SA, and in a game like this where there were plenty of stoppages, there was no need to bring them on so early. Borthwick fucked up.
We don’t have any props who can scrummage! Why do you think dads army were there in the first place. Blame the Premiership not the coach
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Was stupid to select reserves props who can't scrum against a team like SA, and in a game like this where there were plenty of stoppages, there was no need to bring them on so early. Borthwick fucked up.
We don’t have any props who can scrummage! Why do you think dads army were there in the first place. Blame the Premiership not the coach
Then why replace the starters so early? It's not like they weren't having rest breaks every 5 minutes.
-
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Was stupid to select reserves props who can't scrum against a team like SA, and in a game like this where there were plenty of stoppages, there was no need to bring them on so early. Borthwick fucked up.
We don’t have any props who can scrummage! Why do you think dads army were there in the first place. Blame the Premiership not the coach
Then why replace the starters so early? It's not like they weren't having rest breaks every 5 minutes.
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Was stupid to select reserves props who can't scrum against a team like SA, and in a game like this where there were plenty of stoppages, there was no need to bring them on so early. Borthwick fucked up.
We don’t have any props who can scrummage! Why do you think dads army were there in the first place. Blame the Premiership not the coach
Then why replace the starters so early? It's not like they weren't having rest breaks every 5 minutes.
Because the guys who had been on for 55 mins got folded in half after the Boks changed their front row
-
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Was stupid to select reserves props who can't scrum against a team like SA, and in a game like this where there were plenty of stoppages, there was no need to bring them on so early. Borthwick fucked up.
We don’t have any props who can scrummage! Why do you think dads army were there in the first place. Blame the Premiership not the coach
Then why replace the starters so early? It's not like they weren't having rest breaks every 5 minutes.
Because the guys who had been on for 55 mins got folded in half after the Boks changed their front row
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Was stupid to select reserves props who can't scrum against a team like SA, and in a game like this where there were plenty of stoppages, there was no need to bring them on so early. Borthwick fucked up.
We don’t have any props who can scrummage! Why do you think dads army were there in the first place. Blame the Premiership not the coach
Then why replace the starters so early? It's not like they weren't having rest breaks every 5 minutes.
Because the guys who had been on for 55 mins got folded in half after the Boks changed their front row
Including "that" Mitchell kick after having it on a string for 50 minutes
-
@booboo said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@LABCAT said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Why are people complaining about the try?
I couldn't see anything wrong with it.
Shame England didn't win as I doubt they would have any chance against the All Blacks.
Because the runner off the back of the lineoit was tackled to the ground and got up and went again without releasing
But was he held?
Yes! He bounced off the first tackler but Vunipola completed it, brought him to ground and then he stood up
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@booboo said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@LABCAT said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Why are people complaining about the try?
I couldn't see anything wrong with it.
Shame England didn't win as I doubt they would have any chance against the All Blacks.
Because the runner off the back of the lineoit was tackled to the ground and got up and went again without releasing
But was he held?
Yes!
Just looked. Yes he was, but it's unclear to me what he did after that, there's no clear replay of what happened. It certainly looked real-time as if he got up, but potentially just rolled over. Would like to see that from the sideline camera.
I understand your disappointment though @Dodge
-
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Was stupid to select reserves props who can't scrum against a team like SA, and in a game like this where there were plenty of stoppages, there was no need to bring them on so early. Borthwick fucked up.
We don’t have any props who can scrummage! Why do you think dads army were there in the first place. Blame the Premiership not the coach
Then why replace the starters so early? It's not like they weren't having rest breaks every 5 minutes.
Because the guys who had been on for 55 mins got folded in half after the Boks changed their front row
Including "that" Mitchell kick after having it on a string for 50 minutes
@Bones said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@akan004 said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Was stupid to select reserves props who can't scrum against a team like SA, and in a game like this where there were plenty of stoppages, there was no need to bring them on so early. Borthwick fucked up.
We don’t have any props who can scrummage! Why do you think dads army were there in the first place. Blame the Premiership not the coach
Then why replace the starters so early? It's not like they weren't having rest breaks every 5 minutes.
Because the guys who had been on for 55 mins got folded in half after the Boks changed their front row
Including "that" Mitchell kick after having it on a string for 50 minutes
Another ridiculous replacement.
-
@taniwharugby gold. England stake another commonwealth claim
-
What a crap match. A replay of the 2007 final. SA only have 2 tactics: high balls and scrum penalties.
@Billy-Tell said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
What a crap match. A replay of the 2007 final. SA only have 2 tactics: high balls and scrum penalties.
Only one tactic tonight
-
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@booboo said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@LABCAT said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Why are people complaining about the try?
I couldn't see anything wrong with it.
Shame England didn't win as I doubt they would have any chance against the All Blacks.
Because the runner off the back of the lineoit was tackled to the ground and got up and went again without releasing
But was he held?
Yes!
Just looked. Yes he was, but it's unclear to me what he did after that, there's no clear replay of what happened. It certainly looked real-time as if he got up, but potentially just rolled over. Would like to see that from the sideline camera.
I understand your disappointment though @Dodge
@booboo said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@booboo said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@LABCAT said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Why are people complaining about the try?
I couldn't see anything wrong with it.
Shame England didn't win as I doubt they would have any chance against the All Blacks.
Because the runner off the back of the lineoit was tackled to the ground and got up and went again without releasing
But was he held?
Yes!
Just looked. Yes he was, but it's unclear to me what he did after that, there's no clear replay of what happened. It certainly looked real-time as if he got up, but potentially just rolled over. Would like to see that from the sideline camera.
I understand your disappointment though @Dodge
To be fair, it doesn’t matter what he did after that. He was tackled, got up, went for the line and was hit again. Whether it made any difference is irrelevant to how obvious a penalty it was
https://twitter.com/kc_ryback80/status/1715831906556633287?s=46&t=q6tkBviRRuJu6KSieNbO0Q
-
Just watched delay. England had that. The starting props will want to execute their replacements. All that insane commitment for nothing.
-
@Billy-Tell said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
What a crap match. A replay of the 2007 final. SA only have 2 tactics: high balls and scrum penalties.
Only one tactic tonight
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Billy-Tell said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
What a crap match. A replay of the 2007 final. SA only have 2 tactics: high balls and scrum penalties.
Only one tactic tonight
Did BOK become obsessed with scrums at the end. Evidence on X that says yes
-
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Billy-Tell said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
What a crap match. A replay of the 2007 final. SA only have 2 tactics: high balls and scrum penalties.
Only one tactic tonight
Did BOK become obsessed with scrums at the end. Evidence on X that says yes
@BerniesCorner said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Billy-Tell said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
What a crap match. A replay of the 2007 final. SA only have 2 tactics: high balls and scrum penalties.
Only one tactic tonight
Did BOK become obsessed with scrums at the end. Evidence on X that says yes
To be fair to BOK, Reynal gave most of them from the far side which is why BOK went over
-
@booboo said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@booboo said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@LABCAT said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Why are people complaining about the try?
I couldn't see anything wrong with it.
Shame England didn't win as I doubt they would have any chance against the All Blacks.
Because the runner off the back of the lineoit was tackled to the ground and got up and went again without releasing
But was he held?
Yes!
Just looked. Yes he was, but it's unclear to me what he did after that, there's no clear replay of what happened. It certainly looked real-time as if he got up, but potentially just rolled over. Would like to see that from the sideline camera.
I understand your disappointment though @Dodge
To be fair, it doesn’t matter what he did after that. He was tackled, got up, went for the line and was hit again. Whether it made any difference is irrelevant to how obvious a penalty it was
https://twitter.com/kc_ryback80/status/1715831906556633287?s=46&t=q6tkBviRRuJu6KSieNbO0Q
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@booboo said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@booboo said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@LABCAT said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Why are people complaining about the try?
I couldn't see anything wrong with it.
Shame England didn't win as I doubt they would have any chance against the All Blacks.
Because the runner off the back of the lineoit was tackled to the ground and got up and went again without releasing
But was he held?
Yes!
Just looked. Yes he was, but it's unclear to me what he did after that, there's no clear replay of what happened. It certainly looked real-time as if he got up, but potentially just rolled over. Would like to see that from the sideline camera.
I understand your disappointment though @Dodge
To be fair, it doesn’t matter what he did after that. He was tackled, got up, went for the line and was hit again. Whether it made any difference is irrelevant to how obvious a penalty it was
https://x.com/kc_ryback80/status/1715831906556633287?s=46&t=q6tkBviRRuJu6KSieNbO0Q
I think he was flung over by the tackler, so don't agree from that view
-
@mencey said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Scrum now worries me. Lomax and De groot need to have masive shifts.
Which they always do. I couldn't be worried less.
@Bones said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@mencey said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
Scrum now worries me. Lomax and De groot need to have masive shifts.
Which they always do. I couldn't be worried less.
Fuck i hope u are wright
-
@BerniesCorner said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
@Billy-Tell said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:
What a crap match. A replay of the 2007 final. SA only have 2 tactics: high balls and scrum penalties.
Only one tactic tonight
Did BOK become obsessed with scrums at the end. Evidence on X that says yes
To be fair to BOK, Reynal gave most of them from the far side which is why BOK went over
