Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Canterbury vs North Harbour

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
canterburynorthharbour
29 Posts 9 Posters 1.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Leo and Stevenson combine for another

    Leo having a great game. I've always been a bit dissapointed with him in xv's.. a high error rate etc. He's been extremely good today. A shame he's gone to league

    55-19 after 60mins

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • T Offline
      T Offline
      tubbyj
      wrote on last edited by tubbyj
      #15

      Stevenson and Suafoa must be enjoying thrashing the shit out of Scott Robertson favourites and likely All Black EOYT's Zac Gallagher, Brayden Ennor and Chay Fihaki.

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • DuluthD Offline
        DuluthD Offline
        Duluth
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        9th NH try

        62-19 after 72mins

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • JKJ Offline
          JKJ Offline
          JK
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          A very enjoyable watch this

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • DuluthD Duluth

            29-19 at HT

            Cantabs should be confident. The better side in the second quarter, they have the wind in the 2nd half, NH storm week and Harbour have been shit at closing out matches

            JKJ Offline
            JKJ Offline
            JK
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            @Duluth said in Canterbury vs North Harbour:

            29-19 at HT

            Cantabs should be confident. The better side in the second quarter, they have the wind in the 2nd half, NH storm week and Harbour have been shit at closing out matches

            Not today though! Canterbury getting teared a new one

            DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • Canes4lifeC Offline
              Canes4lifeC Offline
              Canes4life
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              So two big provinces get a spanking this week. Yikes.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • JKJ JK

                @Duluth said in Canterbury vs North Harbour:

                29-19 at HT

                Cantabs should be confident. The better side in the second quarter, they have the wind in the 2nd half, NH storm week and Harbour have been shit at closing out matches

                Not today though! Canterbury getting teared a new one

                DuluthD Offline
                DuluthD Offline
                Duluth
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                @JK

                Happy to be wrong about that

                Harbour had some great tries today

                Final score 65-19

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • DuluthD Offline
                  DuluthD Offline
                  Duluth
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  https://twitter.com/BunningsNPC/status/1840214621355160049

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  4
                  • NTAN Offline
                    NTAN Offline
                    NTA
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    This game shows why AB Rugby is in trouble. Harbour never had to commit anyone to their rucks because Canterbury weren't contesting abut 75% of the time.

                    I'm not sure that Edmed's form means anything in the context of this NPC

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • DuluthD Offline
                      DuluthD Offline
                      Duluth
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • DuluthD Offline
                        DuluthD Offline
                        Duluth
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        65-19 is Canterbury’s worst score conceded and it equals the worst margin (the previous worst was 60-14 v Wellington in 2017)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • NTAN NTA

                          This game shows why AB Rugby is in trouble. Harbour never had to commit anyone to their rucks because Canterbury weren't contesting abut 75% of the time.

                          I'm not sure that Edmed's form means anything in the context of this NPC

                          B Offline
                          B Offline
                          brodean
                          wrote on last edited by brodean
                          #25

                          @NTA

                          Because we keep picking easybeats from Canterbury for the wider squad?

                          Paradoxically the ABs won more turnovers than any other team in the RC and the Boks won the least.

                          HigginsH 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B brodean

                            @NTA

                            Because we keep picking easybeats from Canterbury for the wider squad?

                            Paradoxically the ABs won more turnovers than any other team in the RC and the Boks won the least.

                            HigginsH Offline
                            HigginsH Offline
                            Higgins
                            wrote on last edited by Higgins
                            #26

                            @brodean You can only win turnovers when the opposition team has the ball hence one of the reasons why the Boks won the least.

                            B 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • HigginsH Higgins

                              @brodean You can only win turnovers when the opposition team has the ball hence one of the reasons why the Boks won the least.

                              B Offline
                              B Offline
                              brodean
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #27

                              @Higgins
                              Certainly in theory however the AB's won 40 turnovers and the Springboks won 26. It's a massive difference which can't be explained by the possession stats.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • DuluthD Offline
                                DuluthD Offline
                                Duluth
                                wrote on last edited by Duluth
                                #28

                                The fact this scoreline barely rates a mention tells you how dead the NPC is

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                6
                                • KirwanK Offline
                                  KirwanK Offline
                                  Kirwan
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #29

                                  Well that was enjoyable. Canterbury lucky to come second in that one.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Search
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Search