Thought I would join the other long time lurkers and re-enter the fray.
World rugby has created a no win scenario with the way they want dangerous contact officiated.
Refs can't win if they give a red they ruin the match. Which costs a small fortune to go and watch. They don't they're not being consistent and as we have seen over a 3 match series they can cost a team the series.
Ireland would most likely not have held on with 14 men in the 3rd. The All Black's had almost no chance in the second with 14. Those are just the realities of top flight rugby at this level. Now it looks like whoops we got it wrong oh well you're good sports take it on the chin and move on.
If Foster goes because a ref made the wrong call that seems pretty shitty for him. I say that as someone who was never for his taking the top job.
I think where we went wrong was when we adopted the card system. Hear me out as I roll back the years.
Back in the day rugby was a bit like ice hockey, there was a code and if you deliberately tried to hurt someone there were consequences. You would get filled in sooner or later. Normally sooner. Dirty play existed but was dealt with outside the framework of the match. Kind of like fighting in hockey. You can cross check someone to the face. But the Piper is going to come calling and you're going to pay for it
Then TV got good, and this stuff was being spotted and it needed to be stopped. So we looked around and thought Football (soccer for those so inclined) has discipline all figured out, let's adopt their card system. So yellows and reds. But yellows are kind of bullshit. They can be for anything from smashing a guys cheekbone accidentally, not being good enough to hold up your side of the scrum, fucking up an intercept, doing the same dumb shit over and over again despite being told not to. With reds held back for real foul play, punching, biting eye gouging sort of thing. Because we didn't want players dealing out discipline to each other. But in football a red card is not a death knell. If you're leading or drawing park the bus. If losing you can still score most games are decided by 1 or 2 goals. You don't score in multiples.
Then head injuries became a focus point and reds started being applied for all sorts of things, jumping in the air to catch a ball but not getting it, not jumping and having someone who is land on you head clashes of any sort. Stuff that may have had no ill intent at all.
So now games and even test series are frequently spoiled by red cards.
Okay so history lesson over. What's the solution?
How about we look at the other big money sports? If we don't want to go the ice hockey route fine I get that.
But the NBA and the NFL don't fuck over the Superbowl because some one has a brain explosion and tries to decapitate someone. They give the team offended against a decent penalty then they kick the offender's sorry arse out, continue the match and fine them into oblivion. The team gets fined as well. Normally a lot more then the player. Money fucking matters, so that stops teams sending out hitmen to take out players.
So my proposal keep yellows for repeat offending or cynical play. It's within the construct of the game. But for filth, 7 points and the player is ejected. If you get it wrong the player is cleared at judiciary and a 7 point advantage isn't enough that the game is out of reach. Players will stop that shit we saw in England Aussie real quick when they are writing 5 figure cheques.
Final thoughts, Barrett in the first test and Aki in the 3rd were far better candidates for trips to the judiciary then Ta'avao and Porter. Their actions had intent they lined up players unable to defend themselves and smashed shoulders into them. Yet both not even looked at it. That makes literally no sense. Oh WalesOnline I am still waiting for your write up about Akis "sickening" challenge. Just kidding what you do can hardly be considered writing.
That series could have gone either way. Honestly we were robbed from ever knowing the real outcome by officiating, that's not acceptable.