All Blacks vs Ireland

[voodoo]

@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

@antipodean said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

@Lancaster-Park said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

Also whats the new ruling about defending a high ball chase? The commentators seemed to suggest its a new tweak but could understand why we got pinged when no one obviously changed their line. Was I just blind?

I'd like to know too as it appeared to my weary eyes that players were penalised for running a straight line back to there the ball was predicted to land.

Below is what I have been able to gather - noting World Rugby have done an awful job communicating this.

From what I can gather it's an emphasis on ensuring the kick receipt team allow more access for the chaser to have a clean challenge.

Basically it's no longer good enough to subtly block or 'escort' by running back towards the ball.

You need to allow access or get out of the way

I actually see the merit in it and I think it's paying dividends.

I've seen more one on one contests and less dangerous contests as chasers can time their contest better as they don't have to deal with as much 'traffic'

Below I found in some different articles.

Basically, match officials have been told by World Rugby that they needed to clamp down on 'kick escorting' this autumn. A 'kick escort' is a player who retreats downfield after the opposition has kicked, impeding chasing players and allowing their team-mate to have a better chance of catching the ball cleanly.

Players who block their opponents from contesting a high-ball against their team-mate are known as 'escort runners', and up until now, provided you didn't change your running line, then everything was legal.

Officials will be more strict with this in the autumn games. If players slow down with an attacking chaser behind them, then they will risk being penalised.

I think it's complete nonsense. The idea that a player on the receiving team, actually has to actively move so that a tackler can get to his teammate to make a tackle/contest the ball, putting his team under pressure (more tackles made, can't get as many support players to the tackled player etc), just seems utterly bizarre.

Run a straight line as a defender, and the tackler can judge where he wants to run and time it accordingly. If the attacker doesn't get there to compete or make a tackle because the defenders are retreating, then so be it.

[mariner4life]

If i am a coach, i am having minimum three genuine chasers to every box kick now. Receiving team players physically won't be able to avoid every player, move away from one, you impede another. Only option is stand still. And you create yourself a huge advantage even if the receiver makes a clean catch.

[voodoo]

@mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

If i am a coach, i am having minimum three genuine chasers to every box kick now. Receiving team players physically won't be able to avoid every player, move away from one, you impede another. Only option is stand still. And you create yourself a huge advantage even if the receiver makes a clean catch.

2 players actively compete for the ball (one in the air, the other as a tackler), while the 3rd looks to initiate some contact and takes a swan dive

[ARHS]

I was angered that James Lowe seemed to deliberately milk a penalty on his chase.

[Billy Tell]

@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

@Nepia said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

it was like the law makers were fixing a hole that wasn't broken

That was my thinking before I saw it in action

Since seeing it in action I actually think they have solved an issue

However, I get where you are coming from.

Ireland looked lost. One of their main ways of « cheating » was gone. I think it’s a great rule change. As long as refs aren’t over zealous.

[canefan]

@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

@Nepia said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

it was like the law makers were fixing a hole that wasn't broken

That was my thinking before I saw it in action

Since seeing it in action I actually think they have solved an issue

However, I get where you are coming from.

I think it actually helped out kick contests, and the Irish struggled. By the end they were standing under our kicks not knowing if they should run a line or not

[reprobate]

@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

@Nepia said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

it was like the law makers were fixing a hole that wasn't broken

That was my thinking before I saw it in action

Since seeing it in action I actually think they have solved an issue

However, I get where you are coming from.

Did you watch the Aussie game? Looked very much to me like Salakaia-Lotu who had been retreating towards the ball, then changed his line to clear the area, or 'open up the space' as the refs have been saying - and the attacking chaser consequently clattered into him. For me, you don't have eyes in the back of your head, and therefore any change in direction is dangerous.
Naturally he was penalised for trying to follow the new 'law'.

[Machpants]

@Daffy-Jaffy said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

Fuck Sky sucks cocks

[Machpants]

Algerian VPN works

[antipodean]

@Machpants said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

Algerian VPN works

with?

[Machpants]

@antipodean said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

@Machpants said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

Algerian VPN works

with?

ExpressVPN

[antipodean]

@Machpants said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

@antipodean said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

@Machpants said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

Algerian VPN works

with?

ExpressVPN

No, I meant what are you trying to achieve?

[Machpants]

@antipodean said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

@Machpants said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

@antipodean said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

@Machpants said in All Blacks vs Ireland:

Algerian VPN works

with?

ExpressVPN

No, I meant what are you trying to achieve?

Oh watching the NZ v Ire Squidge vid