• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Justin Marshall - Petition

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
56 Posts 30 Posters 6.8k Views
Justin Marshall - Petition
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    I don't mind Mashall at all now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    Just swap Marshall and Wilson around

    Put Marshall on the sidelines to talk about conditions, subs etc

    Wilson is the better analyst so put him next to Nisbett.

    jeggaJ ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    Marshall is by far the best 'comments man' out there.

    Find the 'hate' bizarre.

    Occasionally gets rules wrong, occasionally too un-biased. Ooooh string him up.

    Positives:
    Doesn't whine.
    Isn't biased.
    Isn't a fapping fanboy.
    Good heads up analysis of what's visible in-ground but not apparent to the viewer.
    Provides more credible analysis that psychic energy, etc
    Gets names right.
    Doesn't call opposition cheats.
    Doesn't moan constantly about refs.
    Hasn't called a ref a 'disgrace'.
    Has been a positive less-moany influence on his main commentator (both Nisbo and TJ) on both the laws in general and particular in-game decisions.

    I reckon we're lucky to have currently a decent Comms team who aren't a complete embarrassment on international feeds.

    I like him, and remember the pre-marshy days with absolute disdain.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #36

    @Duluth having Wilson there has made him lift his game a fair bit I reckon . He was better this weekend, I love it when someone who's played at his level breaks down plays and explains what worked and why it went wrong.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #37

    Oh and another thing.

    In an age when sky for example during the Welsh series have after game analysis at the ground by 3 ex-ABs in the commentary team then cut back to studio for a round table discussion by 4 more NZers. Not bothering to get a travelling Welsh media pundit in,

    At least Marshall seems the most knowledgable of them of any overseas rugby players and coaches from his time in Eng and Wales club rugby. All though this relevance will quickly fade as the years pass.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #38

    @Rapido said in Justin Marshall - Petition:

    Marshall is by far the best 'comments man' out there.

    Find the 'hate' bizarre.

    Occasionally gets rules wrong, occasionally too un-biased. Ooooh string him up.

    Positives:
    Doesn't whine.
    Isn't biased.
    Isn't a fapping fanboy.
    Good heads up analysis of what's visible in-ground but not apparent to the viewer.
    Provides more credible analysis that psychic energy, etc
    Gets names right.
    Doesn't call opposition cheats.
    Doesn't moan constantly about refs.
    Hasn't called a ref a 'disgrace'.
    Has been a positive less-moany influence on his main commentator (both Nisbo and TJ) on both the laws in general and particular in-game decisions.

    I reckon we're lucky to have currently a decent Comms team who aren't a complete embarrassment on international feeds.

    I like him, and remember the pre-marshy days with absolute disdain.

    @Rapido said in Justin Marshall - Petition:

    Marshall is by far the best 'comments man' out there.

    Find the 'hate' bizarre.

    Occasionally gets rules wrong, occasionally too un-biased. Ooooh string him up.

    Positives:
    Doesn't whine.
    Isn't biased.
    Isn't a fapping fanboy.
    Good heads up analysis of what's visible in-ground but not apparent to the viewer.
    Provides more credible analysis that psychic energy, etc
    Gets names right.
    Doesn't call opposition cheats.
    Doesn't moan constantly about refs.
    Hasn't called a ref a 'disgrace'.
    Has been a positive less-moany influence on his main commentator (both Nisbo and TJ) on both the laws in general and particular in-game decisions.

    I reckon we're lucky to have currently a decent Comms team who aren't a complete embarrassment on international feeds.

    I like him, and remember the pre-marshy days with absolute disdain.

    He is a fapping fanboy. I thought he was going to spontaneously combust when 'Go Beauden' scored in the final....

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Actually that BB try in the RWC final is a good example of what he brings to the Comms team. While BB was still about 15m behind the action after the Smith kick Marshall immediately alerted the viewer that BB was the man to look out for.

    Great piece of commentary.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    I think Justin has improved a lot. He used to try too hard to be impartial and ended up erring to far on the other side.

    Now he calls what he sees, is ok with being enthusiastic about the ABs, gets more right than he gets wrong.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #41

    @Duluth said in Justin Marshall - Petition:

    Just swap Marshall and Wilson around

    Put Marshall on the sidelines to talk about conditions, subs etc

    Wilson is the better analyst so put him next to Nisbett.

    Although Meg probably has a "can't get hair wet" clause in his Sky contract....

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #42

    @Kirwan said in Justin Marshall - Petition:

    I think Justin has improved a lot. He used to try too hard to be impartial and ended up erring to far on the other side.

    Now he calls what he sees, is ok with being enthusiastic about the ABs, gets more right than he gets wrong.

    Yeah agree with that, he still has some dumb moments, but then who doesn't!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by
    #43

    Marshall "breaking character" for Barrett's try in the final was outstanding I thought. You don't want it every game, but you don't want him underplaying a moment like that either.

    For those slagging Nisbo - gee I reckon you are rating him harshly. There are none better out there IMO. Sumo doesn't bring the big game feel and can be too jingoistic, TJ I quite like but general consensus is against him (he also until recently was a poor talisman for the ABs). Greg Clark and Gordon Bray are abysmal. The RSA contingent don't do much for me - although their Xhosa and Afrikaans commentary teams make more sense than Joel Stransky. The whingers from the North? No thanks.

    As for commentating tries by Beauden Barrett - enjoyed the understated call of his second try last night even though he was 30 meters out. "That's it, see ya".

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    I can cope with Marshall these days. He does annoy me with his knowledge of the laws and attempts to prove a team was "hard done by". Nisbo's voice adds to the event of an AB game - he has authority even when he is spouting bollocks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #45

    Yeah in the context of a RWC final and how that play happened, i.e. OZ hot on attack, ABs defending and then boom turnover and the pace of Barrett, I liked the commentary there.

    Just for you MN5 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #46

    Love it how they both lose their s$!t.

    I was wrong that BB gave up a 20m head start though ..... At the time it seemed like Justin spotted that one so early . Although he did have to plot his route around all the lapped runners on back bend.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    Think he has another moment when Nonu scored off SBW's off-load...shame he didn't use the Nonu, Nonu, Nonu boom line, cos it so woulda worked! 🙂

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #48

    @taniwharugby said in Justin Marshall - Petition:

    Think he has another moment when Nonu scored off SBW's off-load...shame he didn't use the Nonu, Nonu, Nonu boom line, cos it so woulda worked! 🙂

    "He's got Dagg"

    That was the Smit 100th test where the ABs spoiled the party with that last minute try

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gollumG Offline
    gollumG Offline
    gollum
    wrote on last edited by
    #49

    I loathe Marshall as a comentator, he's awful. Both him & Nisbo seems staggeringly uninformed for guys who's job it is to watch rugby. Not just the laws, but a huge amount of what is happening in NZ rugby

    A few weeks back there was an AB warm up where Dagg took over kicking, it was discussed at length on here & the conclusion was the selectors were looking for the extra range Dagg had.

    Then a week later in a test Dagg hits one from way out & Nisbo & Marshall discussed it for 5 minutes saying "did you know he could kick? has he ever kicked before? wow". Clearly neither one had even bothered watching the game of 3 halves a week earlier. They are both awful.

    But we had this discussion re Mexted too. Who was worse.

    Being in the UK I got to listen to Stansky, he was actually pretty good. But I only have to hear him once or twice a year.

    MN5M KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to gollum on last edited by MN5
    #50

    @gollum said in Justin Marshall - Petition:

    I loathe Marshall as a comentator, he's awful. Both him & Nisbo seems staggeringly uninformed for guys who's job it is to watch rugby. Not just the laws, but a huge amount of what is happening in NZ rugby

    A few weeks back there was an AB warm up where Dagg took over kicking, it was discussed at length on here & the conclusion was the selectors were looking for the extra range Dagg had.

    Then a week later in a test Dagg hits one from way out & Nisbo & Marshall discussed it for 5 minutes saying "did you know he could kick? has he ever kicked before? wow". Clearly neither one had even bothered watching the game of 3 halves a week earlier. They are both awful.

    But we had this discussion re Mexted too. Who was worse.

    Being in the UK I got to listen to Stansky, he was actually pretty good. But I only have to hear him once or twice a year.

    It's fair enough for guys like me to be out of touch and uninformed and constantly miss games ( sorry ABs that's two in a row ) but I'm just talking shit on a forum with others, some of whom know more, others less.

    You're right, if it's your job you should be lapping up every single game available and know every stat about every single player, Ken "second man play" Laban is particularly good at this. Cricket shits all over rugby in this particular facet although being a slower game there is more scope to talk a whole lot of shit to be fair.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBast
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    I actually love listening to the northern hemisphere commentators, especially when the ABs are turning it on, because you can almost feel the gritted teeth and blind envy. It's even better when Clive the Fluffybunny has to weasel word his way around the post match. But the sweetest taste is when the Irish commentators who trot out the usual poaching and BOD tropes are left in obvious jawdropping awe - that is worth putting up with the snide remarks about calculated professional fouls and the only slightly masked references to brown folk from the islands

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    As a kiwi living overseas I love nisbett. It's that warm feeling of home with the familiar dulcet tones.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4

Justin Marshall - Petition
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.