Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks v France I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksfrance
1.2k Posts 87 Posters 18.3k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BerniesCornerB BerniesCorner

    How good is it to have a unit in the middle of the lineout securing possession, catching kick-offs and the scrum not going backwards.

    BoournsB Offline
    BoournsB Offline
    Boourns
    wrote on last edited by
    #1089

    @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks v France I:

    How good is it to have a unit in the middle of the lineout securing possession, catching kick-offs and the scrum not going backwards.

    Yeah that was the biggest positive of the night, otherwise a serving up of the same old shite. At least our centres were better, however, our loosies and wing (Jordan is a fb) options are not really up to scratch. Lakai and Sititi being out doesn't help. I reckon those two are the long term prospects there.

    Our Captain isn't doing it for me, more worrying as others have mentioned is our 1st 5 options, BB or Dmac are not the answer but the cuppord is bare.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • BoournsB Boourns

      @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks v France I:

      How good is it to have a unit in the middle of the lineout securing possession, catching kick-offs and the scrum not going backwards.

      Yeah that was the biggest positive of the night, otherwise a serving up of the same old shite. At least our centres were better, however, our loosies and wing (Jordan is a fb) options are not really up to scratch. Lakai and Sititi being out doesn't help. I reckon those two are the long term prospects there.

      Our Captain isn't doing it for me, more worrying as others have mentioned is our 1st 5 options, BB or Dmac are not the answer but the cuppord is bare.

      A Offline
      A Offline
      African Monkey
      wrote on last edited by
      #1090

      @Boourns said in All Blacks v France I:

      @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks v France I:

      How good is it to have a unit in the middle of the lineout securing possession, catching kick-offs and the scrum not going backwards.

      At least our centres were better

      Is that you Billy Proctor?

      1 Reply Last reply
      12
      • Canes4lifeC Online
        Canes4lifeC Online
        Canes4life
        wrote on last edited by Canes4life
        #1091

        Probably the biggest positive for me in this test was seeing Roigard snipe again. He made two exceptional breaks, one leading to a disallowed try and the other where he was cut down just short from scoring.

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        6
        • Canes4lifeC Canes4life

          Probably the biggest positive for me in this test was seeing Roigard snipe again. He made two exceptional breaks, one leading to a disallowed try and the other where he was cut down just short from scoring.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          reprobate
          wrote on last edited by
          #1092

          @Canes4life said in All Blacks v France I:

          Probably the biggest positive for me in this test was seeing Roigard snipe again. He made two exceptional breaks, one leading to a disallowed try and the other where he was cut down just short from scoring.

          Great to see him running so effectively. Ignored Jordie on the inside who would have scored though.
          Passing was good too, kicking okay but not so great - particularly the shocker just before he was subbed.

          Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • R reprobate

            @Canes4life said in All Blacks v France I:

            Probably the biggest positive for me in this test was seeing Roigard snipe again. He made two exceptional breaks, one leading to a disallowed try and the other where he was cut down just short from scoring.

            Great to see him running so effectively. Ignored Jordie on the inside who would have scored though.
            Passing was good too, kicking okay but not so great - particularly the shocker just before he was subbed.

            Canes4lifeC Online
            Canes4lifeC Online
            Canes4life
            wrote on last edited by
            #1093

            @reprobate said in All Blacks v France I:

            @Canes4life said in All Blacks v France I:

            Probably the biggest positive for me in this test was seeing Roigard snipe again. He made two exceptional breaks, one leading to a disallowed try and the other where he was cut down just short from scoring.

            Great to see him running so effectively. Ignored Jordie on the inside who would have scored though.
            Passing was good too, kicking okay but not so great - particularly the shocker just before he was subbed.

            Yeah his kicking for the Canes this year wasn’t as good versus before he was injured. He doesn’t seem to get as much height in his kicks, hopefully he can get back to that level over the test season. His running game is coming back, let’s hope his kicking follows suit.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Offline
              R Offline
              reprobate
              wrote on last edited by
              #1094

              So rugbypass stats say Holland most tackles with 16, followed by de Groot and CLW with 11, then Newell with 9.
              Pretty low tackle count overall because we had all the ball - but still, 2 x debutants and 2 props - and 3 out of the 4 subbed early.

              1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • BonesB Bones

                @pakman said in All Blacks v France I:

                @reprobate said in All Blacks v France I:

                @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

                I guess the issue with BB and his kicking, is he either is 'allowed' to kick or told he shouldn't...I doubt any coach will do that.

                I think he has had free reign for so long, he sees space then poorly executes...

                It was notable when we put our kicking boots away, we were all over them and looking like breaking loose, but didn't, then re went back to the kicking duel, which kept putting ourselves under pressure.

                Kicking asid, BB went pretty well, so how do you get your hugely experienced 10 to kick less?

                His passing was really pretty good, best we've seen from him this year, and he kicked his goals well. But fuck me, he kicks so much attacking ball away it does my head in. Each one of those should be treated as a turnover, because that's what they are - if someone knocked the ball on multiple times every game while hot on attack, they would be crucified.
                I'm sure there'll be some game where it all comes off and we look amazing and put 50 on some team, but most of the time it means not converting opportunities or applying pressure. that's how you get France C staying close enough to potentially snatch victory - and there are several teams out there better than France C.

                And he can't exit with distance. And missed touch from a penalty. And a defensive bomb. And we still don't chase and contest - TBH that's the bit that really confuses me - because if it's a plan, sack the chasers. if it's not a plan, sack the kicker.

                It was noticeable that France had two or three effective chasers, whereas we often had no one getting near the ball.

                What was most frustrating, was when we do have chasers, they seem coached to wait for the ball to either hit the turf or be caught by the opposition. Really substandard.

                K Offline
                K Offline
                kev
                wrote on last edited by
                #1095

                @Bones said in All Blacks v France I:

                @pakman said in All Blacks v France I:

                @reprobate said in All Blacks v France I:

                @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

                I guess the issue with BB and his kicking, is he either is 'allowed' to kick or told he shouldn't...I doubt any coach will do that.

                I think he has had free reign for so long, he sees space then poorly executes...

                It was notable when we put our kicking boots away, we were all over them and looking like breaking loose, but didn't, then re went back to the kicking duel, which kept putting ourselves under pressure.

                Kicking asid, BB went pretty well, so how do you get your hugely experienced 10 to kick less?

                His passing was really pretty good, best we've seen from him this year, and he kicked his goals well. But fuck me, he kicks so much attacking ball away it does my head in. Each one of those should be treated as a turnover, because that's what they are - if someone knocked the ball on multiple times every game while hot on attack, they would be crucified.
                I'm sure there'll be some game where it all comes off and we look amazing and put 50 on some team, but most of the time it means not converting opportunities or applying pressure. that's how you get France C staying close enough to potentially snatch victory - and there are several teams out there better than France C.

                And he can't exit with distance. And missed touch from a penalty. And a defensive bomb. And we still don't chase and contest - TBH that's the bit that really confuses me - because if it's a plan, sack the chasers. if it's not a plan, sack the kicker.

                It was noticeable that France had two or three effective chasers, whereas we often had no one getting near the ball.

                What was most frustrating, was when we do have chasers, they seem coached to wait for the ball to either hit the turf or be caught by the opposition. Really substandard.

                It was like watching the Warriors were everyone just stops. Where is Ben Smith when you need him.

                nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • K kev

                  @Bones said in All Blacks v France I:

                  @pakman said in All Blacks v France I:

                  @reprobate said in All Blacks v France I:

                  @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

                  I guess the issue with BB and his kicking, is he either is 'allowed' to kick or told he shouldn't...I doubt any coach will do that.

                  I think he has had free reign for so long, he sees space then poorly executes...

                  It was notable when we put our kicking boots away, we were all over them and looking like breaking loose, but didn't, then re went back to the kicking duel, which kept putting ourselves under pressure.

                  Kicking asid, BB went pretty well, so how do you get your hugely experienced 10 to kick less?

                  His passing was really pretty good, best we've seen from him this year, and he kicked his goals well. But fuck me, he kicks so much attacking ball away it does my head in. Each one of those should be treated as a turnover, because that's what they are - if someone knocked the ball on multiple times every game while hot on attack, they would be crucified.
                  I'm sure there'll be some game where it all comes off and we look amazing and put 50 on some team, but most of the time it means not converting opportunities or applying pressure. that's how you get France C staying close enough to potentially snatch victory - and there are several teams out there better than France C.

                  And he can't exit with distance. And missed touch from a penalty. And a defensive bomb. And we still don't chase and contest - TBH that's the bit that really confuses me - because if it's a plan, sack the chasers. if it's not a plan, sack the kicker.

                  It was noticeable that France had two or three effective chasers, whereas we often had no one getting near the ball.

                  What was most frustrating, was when we do have chasers, they seem coached to wait for the ball to either hit the turf or be caught by the opposition. Really substandard.

                  It was like watching the Warriors were everyone just stops. Where is Ben Smith when you need him.

                  nostrildamusN Offline
                  nostrildamusN Offline
                  nostrildamus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1096

                  @kev said in All Blacks v France I:

                  It was like watching the Warriors were everyone just stops. Where is Ben Smith when you need him.

                  Coaching the Highlanders?
                  https://thehighlanders.co.nz/our-teams/highlanders-super-rugby/ben-smith/?id=subscribeModal

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • Daffy JaffyD Offline
                    Daffy JaffyD Offline
                    Daffy Jaffy
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1097

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • canefanC canefan

                      @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @canefan when kicks were the right option, he kicked the wrong type or just a shit kick that hes been doing for some time now.

                      Add in poor chasing, extremely poor aerial skills, we should have put the kicks away in the 2nd half except on exits.

                      But agreed, he was good elsewhere, we created alot, put ourselves in position only to be undone by our very poor kicking game

                      What I can't work out is how much is BB at fault, and how much is Razor's team strategy

                      To me, BB plays basically the same under any coach.

                      So is he not receptive to being coached, or are all his coaches either too chicken shit to tell him to change, or they like the uncontrolled way he plays?

                      antipodeanA Offline
                      antipodeanA Offline
                      antipodean
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1098

                      @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @canefan when kicks were the right option, he kicked the wrong type or just a shit kick that hes been doing for some time now.

                      Add in poor chasing, extremely poor aerial skills, we should have put the kicks away in the 2nd half except on exits.

                      But agreed, he was good elsewhere, we created alot, put ourselves in position only to be undone by our very poor kicking game

                      What I can't work out is how much is BB at fault, and how much is Razor's team strategy

                      To me, BB plays basically the same under any coach.

                      So is he not receptive to being coached, or are all his coaches either too chicken shit to tell him to change, or they like the uncontrolled way he plays?

                      There's a fourth option: The coaches believe with the state of the game that an unpredictable (i.e. mixed) kicking game keeps the defence on the back foot. And this provides dividends.

                      canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • MN5M Online
                        MN5M Online
                        MN5
                        wrote on last edited by MN5
                        #1099

                        IMG_4626.jpeg

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        12
                        • ChrisC Chris

                          Finau for a big unit really added no impact in this game,He was passive in the tackle he got knocked back a few times.And went no where forward.
                          Even though Vai'i maybe found out as a bit slow at 6 in the harder games, he was 100% better than Finau.

                          mariner4lifeM Offline
                          mariner4lifeM Offline
                          mariner4life
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1100

                          @Chris said in All Blacks v France I:

                          Finau for a big unit really added no impact in this game,He was passive in the tackle he got knocked back a few times.And went no where forward.
                          Even though Vai'i maybe found out as a bit slow at 6 in the harder games, he was 100% better than Finau.

                          Hard disagree. He dropped an early one cold and I was ready to write him off.

                          But after that he ran fucking hard and made yards in tight. He has a future i think.

                          P ChrisC 2 Replies Last reply
                          7
                          • mariner4lifeM Offline
                            mariner4lifeM Offline
                            mariner4life
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1101

                            For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                            I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                            M J No QuarterN 3 Replies Last reply
                            2
                            • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                              @Chris said in All Blacks v France I:

                              Finau for a big unit really added no impact in this game,He was passive in the tackle he got knocked back a few times.And went no where forward.
                              Even though Vai'i maybe found out as a bit slow at 6 in the harder games, he was 100% better than Finau.

                              Hard disagree. He dropped an early one cold and I was ready to write him off.

                              But after that he ran fucking hard and made yards in tight. He has a future i think.

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              pakman
                              wrote on last edited by pakman
                              #1102

                              @mariner4life Spot on. AB ending 4/5/6 a leg up in dynamism from starters. Suggestion Scioter carrying an Achilles issue.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • antipodeanA antipodean

                                @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

                                @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v France I:

                                @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

                                @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

                                @canefan when kicks were the right option, he kicked the wrong type or just a shit kick that hes been doing for some time now.

                                Add in poor chasing, extremely poor aerial skills, we should have put the kicks away in the 2nd half except on exits.

                                But agreed, he was good elsewhere, we created alot, put ourselves in position only to be undone by our very poor kicking game

                                What I can't work out is how much is BB at fault, and how much is Razor's team strategy

                                To me, BB plays basically the same under any coach.

                                So is he not receptive to being coached, or are all his coaches either too chicken shit to tell him to change, or they like the uncontrolled way he plays?

                                There's a fourth option: The coaches believe with the state of the game that an unpredictable (i.e. mixed) kicking game keeps the defence on the back foot. And this provides dividends.

                                canefanC Offline
                                canefanC Offline
                                canefan
                                wrote on last edited by canefan
                                #1103

                                @antipodean said in All Blacks v France I:

                                @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

                                @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v France I:

                                @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

                                @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

                                @canefan when kicks were the right option, he kicked the wrong type or just a shit kick that hes been doing for some time now.

                                Add in poor chasing, extremely poor aerial skills, we should have put the kicks away in the 2nd half except on exits.

                                But agreed, he was good elsewhere, we created alot, put ourselves in position only to be undone by our very poor kicking game

                                What I can't work out is how much is BB at fault, and how much is Razor's team strategy

                                To me, BB plays basically the same under any coach.

                                So is he not receptive to being coached, or are all his coaches either too chicken shit to tell him to change, or they like the uncontrolled way he plays?

                                There's a fourth option: The coaches believe with the state of the game that an unpredictable (i.e. mixed) kicking game keeps the defence on the back foot. And this provides dividends.

                                Things that the coaches say about the way they want to play could suggest your assertion could be true

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • B brodean

                                  @Mauss

                                  Good post Mauss.

                                  He has the tools but I don't think its in his nature. It's difficult to teach an old dog new tricks and I feel that at 31 that's his instinct.

                                  The carry stats are wrong and where I think we struggled in the game. The highlighted should not be carrying that much considering their roles.

                                  Top Carries

                                  18 Ardie Savea
                                  17 Damian Mckenzie
                                  15 Will Jordan
                                  14 Beauden Barrett
                                  13 Fabian Holland

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  junior
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1104

                                  @brodean said in All Blacks v France I:

                                  @Mauss

                                  Good post Mauss.

                                  He has the tools but I don't think its in his nature. It's difficult to teach an old dog new tricks and I feel that at 31 that's his instinct.

                                  The carry stats are wrong and where I think we struggled in the game. The highlighted should not be carrying that much considering their roles.

                                  Top Carries

                                  18 Ardie Savea
                                  17 Damian Mckenzie
                                  15 Will Jordan
                                  14 Beauden Barrett
                                  13 Fabian Holland

                                  I am not going to check the stats to verify this, but it seemed to me that Kirifi’s first 4 involvements were all carries - why?

                                  Why is it that we constantly have our smallest forwards doing our carrying?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                    For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                                    I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mr Fish
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1105

                                    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

                                    For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                                    I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                                    What didn't you like about McKenzie in this match? Think his only mistake was the attempted grubber (which didn't go too badly in the end, but was still the wrong call).

                                    I think Barrett played well enough at 10 to justify him starting again in the second Test, but McKenzie has been the better performer in the black jersey for the past year, and the better performer in Super Rugby. Barrett was selected ahead of McKenzie for his more sensible decisions around kicking and I think it's pretty clear that he doesn't actually bring that skill to the arena.

                                    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
                                    6
                                    • M Mr Fish

                                      @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

                                      For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                                      I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                                      What didn't you like about McKenzie in this match? Think his only mistake was the attempted grubber (which didn't go too badly in the end, but was still the wrong call).

                                      I think Barrett played well enough at 10 to justify him starting again in the second Test, but McKenzie has been the better performer in the black jersey for the past year, and the better performer in Super Rugby. Barrett was selected ahead of McKenzie for his more sensible decisions around kicking and I think it's pretty clear that he doesn't actually bring that skill to the arena.

                                      voodooV Offline
                                      voodooV Offline
                                      voodoo
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1106

                                      @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v France I:

                                      @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

                                      For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                                      I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                                      What didn't you like about McKenzie in this match? Think his only mistake was the attempted grubber (which didn't go too badly in the end, but was still the wrong call).

                                      I think Barrett played well enough at 10 to justify him starting again in the second Test, but McKenzie has been the better performer in the black jersey for the past year, and the better performer in Super Rugby. Barrett was selected ahead of McKenzie for his more sensible decisions around kicking and I think it's pretty clear that he doesn't actually bring that skill to the arena.

                                      I think the intercept was the other one that was poor - but aside from that, I agree he was pretty good. Brave as hell, some lovely jinks in limited space

                                      I for one was secretly pleased to see Reece leaving the field and DMac coming on (though I never like to see a bloke hurt). Much better back 3 for mine.

                                      BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                                      6
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mr Fish
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1107

                                        Holland's received a lot of praise but I was a little bit underwhelmed.

                                        He didn't really put a foot wrong but he also didn't do anything to suggest he's a better option that Lord or Tuipulotu at this stage. I'm absolutely not saying he shouldn't be in there, I'm as keen to see him given a go as anyone else and I'd love for him to be the new Brodie Retallick, but I've not yet (yet is key, obviously) seen anything from Holland to suggest he's anything more than a safe pair of hands in the second row.

                                        Again, very happy to get him getting some minutes and would certainly keep giving him time in the saddle, but it's a bit unfair that we expect the loose forward to all be dynamic carriers of the ball or threats at the breakdown when the bar for Holland seems so low?

                                        BerniesCornerB F No QuarterN 3 Replies Last reply
                                        1
                                        • M Mr Fish

                                          Holland's received a lot of praise but I was a little bit underwhelmed.

                                          He didn't really put a foot wrong but he also didn't do anything to suggest he's a better option that Lord or Tuipulotu at this stage. I'm absolutely not saying he shouldn't be in there, I'm as keen to see him given a go as anyone else and I'd love for him to be the new Brodie Retallick, but I've not yet (yet is key, obviously) seen anything from Holland to suggest he's anything more than a safe pair of hands in the second row.

                                          Again, very happy to get him getting some minutes and would certainly keep giving him time in the saddle, but it's a bit unfair that we expect the loose forward to all be dynamic carriers of the ball or threats at the breakdown when the bar for Holland seems so low?

                                          BerniesCornerB Offline
                                          BerniesCornerB Offline
                                          BerniesCorner
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1108

                                          @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v France I:

                                          Holland's received a lot of praise but I was a little bit underwhelmed.

                                          He didn't really put a foot wrong but he also didn't do anything to suggest he's a better option that Lord or Tuipulotu at this stage. I'm absolutely not saying he shouldn't be in there, I'm as keen to see him given a go as anyone else and I'd love for him to be the new Brodie Retallick, but I've not yet (yet is key, obviously) seen anything from Holland to suggest he's anything more than a safe pair of hands in the second row.

                                          Again, very happy to get him getting some minutes and would certainly keep giving him time in the saddle, but it's a bit unfair that we expect the loose forward to all be dynamic carriers of the ball or threats at the breakdown when the bar for Holland seems so low?

                                          Topping the tackle charts with 17, topped the lineouts won with 7 and carried 13 times

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                                          11
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search