Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Aaron Smith naughty boy?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
291 Posts 65 Posters 72.7k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #244

    luckily the anonymity of being a 'source' for jouranlists provides them some form of privacy, unlike walls and a locked door on a toilet.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • SmudgeS Offline
      SmudgeS Offline
      Smudge
      wrote on last edited by Smudge
      #245

      Anonymity is given away far too easily by journalists these days. I'm sick of reading stories where a subject only peripheral to the story is someone who ''did not want to be named'' but then casts all sorts of aspersions on the central character of the story.

      And I'm in the industry!

      MokeyM 1 Reply Last reply
      5
      • SmudgeS Smudge

        Anonymity is given away far too easily by journalists these days. I'm sick of reading stories where a subject only peripheral to the story is someone who ''did not want to be named'' but then casts all sorts of aspersions on the central character of the story.

        And I'm in the industry!

        MokeyM Offline
        MokeyM Offline
        Mokey
        wrote on last edited by
        #246

        @Smudge Yeah. Far too many publications get away with 'a source close to' or 'an insider' 'or a friend/relative who did not wish to be named' these days. Little in the way of fact checking from a neutral perspective. So much for the fourth estate.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • DuluthD Duluth

          The coward still won't identify himself

          Yet the media and him have added this to the story:

          they believed the woman involved was an flight attendant or airport employee
          

          Small airport, female employee, photo of her from behind.. All her friends and family will know exactly who it is. How is that fair?

          rotatedR Offline
          rotatedR Offline
          rotated
          wrote on last edited by rotated
          #247

          @Duluth said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:

          Small airport, female employee, photo of her from behind.. All her friends and family will know exactly who it is. How is that fair?

          That kind of comes with the territory when you do something like that in a public place with a high profile place, no?

          Sure you don't factor in the media shit storm, but you can't protest that your privacy is being invaded when you gave that up to kick this whole thing off. Could easily be sprung bad and face employment or police charges or be spotted by a family or friend and net the same result.

          She isn't a victim and doesn't deserve name suppression, at the same time outing who this lady is adds little value to the story and the media have been pretty responsible IMO of not making this lass a household name.

          Much like that couple in the office building window in Christchurch a few years back, when you take risks like that it isn't incumbent on the media to stop close friends and family from putting two and two together. It is awfully nice of them to not blast your name everywhere - if this had occurred in the UK she would be front page not Smith.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            manhat32
            wrote on last edited by
            #248

            This couple are first class cowards. The husband doesn't wear the pants in that relationship. His wife sounds like a complete cow. What did they think would happen by releasing it to the media seriously...ignorant. He's now gone on to say sorry and out the female as airline staff!! Shut up man you are making it worse!!! How incredibly stupid. If his wife is so righteous and moralistic she should have no problem revealing her identity...

            1 Reply Last reply
            6
            • MilkM Offline
              MilkM Offline
              Milk
              wrote on last edited by
              #249

              http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/85264885/aaron-smith-witnesss-full-apology

              "We have had a lot of (negative) attention this past week which is very, very scary...

              "You can probably guess how much of a safety threat now it would be if we were identified and this is probably the issue we did not consider at the time. We did not consider the public backlash against us....

              "Yes, I regret reporting it because it has had a much more serious outcome than expected.

              "[My wife] does not, as she thinks that he and the rugby union needed to be accountable.

              "She said we shouldn't have had to wait like peasants to use the baby's room so that an over-paid rugby player could entertain female company. She is still fuming.

              "So, in short, we as are couple are split on this question but what's done is done now."

              THE APOLOGY

              "I feel the need to apologise because I do not think Smith has deserved this much trouble. A slap on the hand was probably sufficient.

              "We were expecting, at most, a tiny side article that no one would hardly even see."

              MokeyM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • TeWaioT Offline
                TeWaioT Offline
                TeWaio
                wrote on last edited by TeWaio
                #250

                Given the thread I am clearly in the minority here, but I kind of agree with the wife.

                "She said we shouldn't have had to wait like peasants to use the baby's room so that an over-paid rugby player could entertain female company. She is still fuming."

                Fair enough too. What a ridiculous thing to do given his profile, while flying with the team, when he has a partner who is therefore in the public eye as well.

                Personally, I wouldn't go as far as recording it and giving it to the press if was there, but I don't think vilifying someone who does is reasonable either.

                MilkM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • TeWaioT TeWaio

                  Given the thread I am clearly in the minority here, but I kind of agree with the wife.

                  "She said we shouldn't have had to wait like peasants to use the baby's room so that an over-paid rugby player could entertain female company. She is still fuming."

                  Fair enough too. What a ridiculous thing to do given his profile, while flying with the team, when he has a partner who is therefore in the public eye as well.

                  Personally, I wouldn't go as far as recording it and giving it to the press if was there, but I don't think vilifying someone who does is reasonable either.

                  MilkM Offline
                  MilkM Offline
                  Milk
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #251

                  @TeWaio said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:

                  She said we shouldn't have had to wait like peasants to use the baby's room so that an over-paid rugby player could entertain female company. She is still fuming

                  I feel like that's the first time we've been told they were waiting to use the bathroom after him? I wasn't under the impression that this is what happened.

                  TeWaioT 1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • MilkM Milk

                    @TeWaio said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:

                    She said we shouldn't have had to wait like peasants to use the baby's room so that an over-paid rugby player could entertain female company. She is still fuming

                    I feel like that's the first time we've been told they were waiting to use the bathroom after him? I wasn't under the impression that this is what happened.

                    TeWaioT Offline
                    TeWaioT Offline
                    TeWaio
                    wrote on last edited by TeWaio
                    #252

                    @Milk Ah ok, to be fair I've mostly been relying on the thread to keep up with what's been happening. I guess disabled loos have baby changing facilities as well so it makes sense, and makes them come off a bit better than someone just randomly lurking outside a loo?

                    MilkM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • TeWaioT TeWaio

                      @Milk Ah ok, to be fair I've mostly been relying on the thread to keep up with what's been happening. I guess disabled loos have baby changing facilities as well so it makes sense, and makes them come off a bit better than someone just randomly lurking outside a loo?

                      MilkM Offline
                      MilkM Offline
                      Milk
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #253

                      @TeWaio

                      I'm not 100% sure, but I was just under the impression they watched them go in? Otherwise what made them get the camera out if they didn't know an All Black was in there.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • CatograndeC Offline
                        CatograndeC Offline
                        Catogrande
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #254

                        The so called apology and the rationale (wife's) smacks of attempted damage limitation to me.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • BonesB Offline
                          BonesB Offline
                          Bones
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #255

                          I can't for the life of me figure how they thought it would be nothing news....and to think that then decide to go straight to the media instead of to the NZRU who they supposedly think need to answer to this? Yeah, nah.

                          Waiting like peasants huh, methinks not quite. Dickheads.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • PaekakboyzP Offline
                            PaekakboyzP Offline
                            Paekakboyz
                            wrote on last edited by Paekakboyz
                            #256

                            Ha!! that is new information and different to their initial story, as was the concern about the woman being an airline/airport staff member.

                            Human brain is a weird and wonderful thing when you are trying to justify being a dick to yourself.... and the nation...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • CrucialC Offline
                              CrucialC Offline
                              Crucial
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #257

                              Colour me confused. First it was a disabled persons toilet and therefore a crime against wheelchair users but now it's a baby changing toilet?
                              So what happens if a disabled person needs to go to the toilet while a parent mucks around in there organising the five bags of baby kit they must carry at all times? Does that poor disabled person have to wait 'like a peasant'?

                              No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • MilkM Milk

                                http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/85264885/aaron-smith-witnesss-full-apology

                                "We have had a lot of (negative) attention this past week which is very, very scary...

                                "You can probably guess how much of a safety threat now it would be if we were identified and this is probably the issue we did not consider at the time. We did not consider the public backlash against us....

                                "Yes, I regret reporting it because it has had a much more serious outcome than expected.

                                "[My wife] does not, as she thinks that he and the rugby union needed to be accountable.

                                "She said we shouldn't have had to wait like peasants to use the baby's room so that an over-paid rugby player could entertain female company. She is still fuming.

                                "So, in short, we as are couple are split on this question but what's done is done now."

                                THE APOLOGY

                                "I feel the need to apologise because I do not think Smith has deserved this much trouble. A slap on the hand was probably sufficient.

                                "We were expecting, at most, a tiny side article that no one would hardly even see."

                                MokeyM Offline
                                MokeyM Offline
                                Mokey
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #258

                                @Milk said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:

                                http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/85264885/aaron-smith-witnesss-full-apology

                                "We have had a lot of (negative) attention this past week which is very, very scary...

                                "You can probably guess how much of a safety threat now it would be if we were identified and this is probably the issue we did not consider at the time. We did not consider the public backlash against us....

                                "Yes, I regret reporting it because it has had a much more serious outcome than expected.

                                "[My wife] does not, as she thinks that he and the rugby union needed to be accountable.

                                "She said we shouldn't have had to wait like peasants to use the baby's room so that an over-paid rugby player could entertain female company. She is still fuming.

                                I feel like this says more than anything else. And yes, couple, you are perverts. No one who records a pair of strangers having sex in a bathroom is doing it for reasons of outrage. As for trying to deflect onto the woman Smith was with by offering details, this just makes you suck even more as humans. Fuck you both. At any point here, you could have let this story die. BUT YOU KEEP MAKING MORE COMMENTS. I hope you are outed. You made your bed, now lie in it.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                11
                                • R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  reprobate
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #259

                                  this whole episode puts an entirely new meaning on the phrase 'selected for the WC'.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  7
                                  • CrucialC Crucial

                                    Colour me confused. First it was a disabled persons toilet and therefore a crime against wheelchair users but now it's a baby changing toilet?
                                    So what happens if a disabled person needs to go to the toilet while a parent mucks around in there organising the five bags of baby kit they must carry at all times? Does that poor disabled person have to wait 'like a peasant'?

                                    No QuarterN Offline
                                    No QuarterN Offline
                                    No Quarter
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #260

                                    @Crucial said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:

                                    Colour me confused. First it was a disabled persons toilet and therefore a crime against wheelchair users but now it's a baby changing toilet?
                                    So what happens if a disabled person needs to go to the toilet while a parent mucks around in there organising the five bags of baby kit they must carry at all times? Does that poor disabled person have to wait 'like a peasant'?

                                    Yeah that confused me too. I've never seen a parents room and disabled toilet merged into one so which one is it? Or is she making stuff up to try and get more sympathy? Surely it was a disabled toilet, I can't image Smith going "yeah let's rock into the fucking parents room with kids everywhere and knock one out...".

                                    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • No QuarterN No Quarter

                                      @Crucial said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:

                                      Colour me confused. First it was a disabled persons toilet and therefore a crime against wheelchair users but now it's a baby changing toilet?
                                      So what happens if a disabled person needs to go to the toilet while a parent mucks around in there organising the five bags of baby kit they must carry at all times? Does that poor disabled person have to wait 'like a peasant'?

                                      Yeah that confused me too. I've never seen a parents room and disabled toilet merged into one so which one is it? Or is she making stuff up to try and get more sympathy? Surely it was a disabled toilet, I can't image Smith going "yeah let's rock into the fucking parents room with kids everywhere and knock one out...".

                                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                      ACT Crusader
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #261

                                      @No-Quarter said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:

                                      @Crucial said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:

                                      Colour me confused. First it was a disabled persons toilet and therefore a crime against wheelchair users but now it's a baby changing toilet?
                                      So what happens if a disabled person needs to go to the toilet while a parent mucks around in there organising the five bags of baby kit they must carry at all times? Does that poor disabled person have to wait 'like a peasant'?

                                      Yeah that confused me too. I've never seen a parents room and disabled toilet merged into one so which one is it? Or is she making stuff up to try and get more sympathy? Surely it was a disabled toilet, I can't image Smith going "yeah let's rock into the fucking parents room with kids everywhere and knock one out...".

                                      In some disabled toilets they have a fold down baby changing table because there is usually more room in those facilities.

                                      I make no comment on what said baby changing table was used for whilst Mr Smith occupied it....

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        Tregaskis
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #262

                                        She is turning out to be a right shit, this woman. The husband sounds like he's throwing her under the bus. If their relationship encounters some temporary friction because of their actions, then that is probably deserved. Sure they are only the messenger, but their behaviour reeks.

                                        I also don't understand why she says Aaron Smith is overpaid. He is surely among the top 5 or 10 rugby players in the world. Anyone who is that good in a field which is highly competitive deserves to be handsomely rewarded.

                                        No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • T Tregaskis

                                          She is turning out to be a right shit, this woman. The husband sounds like he's throwing her under the bus. If their relationship encounters some temporary friction because of their actions, then that is probably deserved. Sure they are only the messenger, but their behaviour reeks.

                                          I also don't understand why she says Aaron Smith is overpaid. He is surely among the top 5 or 10 rugby players in the world. Anyone who is that good in a field which is highly competitive deserves to be handsomely rewarded.

                                          No QuarterN Offline
                                          No QuarterN Offline
                                          No Quarter
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #263

                                          @Tregaskis said in Aaron Smith naughty boy?:

                                          She is turning out to be a right shit, this woman. The husband sounds like he's throwing her under the bus. If their relationship encounters some temporary friction because of their actions, then that is probably deserved. Sure they are only the messenger, but their behaviour reeks.

                                          I also don't understand why she says Aaron Smith is overpaid. He is surely among the top 5 or 10 rugby players in the world. Anyone who is that good in a field which is highly competitive deserves to be handsomely rewarded.

                                          He's massively underpaid considering the offers he must be getting from up north. What a bitter woman lol.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search