All Blacks v France III
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks v France III:
@Canes4life said in All Blacks v France III:
12 Tupaea 13. Proctor
Very untested combo. Dead Rubber. Will Robertson chance his arm?
Aren't they "tested" for the maori?
@Bones said in All Blacks v France III:
@Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks v France III:
@Canes4life said in All Blacks v France III:
12 Tupaea 13. Proctor
Very untested combo. Dead Rubber. Will Robertson chance his arm?
Aren't they "tested" for the maori?
Even more reason to chance ones arm at the next level up.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@voodoo said in All Blacks v France III:
@Nepia said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
Too many Chiefs
Too many Reece's.
Totally. Why Reece over Narawa? Surely not just “work rate”.
Razor said he wanted to give every one in the original squad a run.
Reece only had a rrrr….
Had his body actually progressed past halfway, or did he just nod?
@Bones said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@voodoo said in All Blacks v France III:
@Nepia said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
Too many Chiefs
Too many Reece's.
Totally. Why Reece over Narawa? Surely not just “work rate”.
Razor said he wanted to give every one in the original squad a run.
Reece only had a rrrr….
Had his body actually progressed past halfway, or did he just nod?
He lead with his head
-
I just hope our midfield actually does something, though if Tupaea and ALB rips the French to shreds it will probably rasie more questions than answers.
@Windows97 said in All Blacks v France III:
I just hope our midfield actually does something, though if Tupaea and ALB rips the French to shreds it will probably rasie more questions than answers.
But a nice problem to have considering the shit show the midfield has been for years.
-
Not a fan of any more rotation talk. Given the number of injuries, a lot of guys have got game time… and have generally done quite well. Funny how that works, isn’t it?
Just put the best team out there, whatever Surfboard Jesus thinks that is, and pretend it’s a RWC quarter final.
They can’t give the frogs a reason to not be anything but absolutely miserable on the flight home.
-
Not a fan of any more rotation talk. Given the number of injuries, a lot of guys have got game time… and have generally done quite well. Funny how that works, isn’t it?
Just put the best team out there, whatever Surfboard Jesus thinks that is, and pretend it’s a RWC quarter final.
They can’t give the frogs a reason to not be anything but absolutely miserable on the flight home.
@game_film said in All Blacks v France III:
They can’t give the frogs a reason to not be anything but absolutely miserable on the flight home.
especially after thier Juniors lost as well, and hopefully they were made to visit the site of the Rainbow Warrior last week....
-
@voodoo said in All Blacks v France III:
@Nepia said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
Too many Chiefs
Too many Reece's.
Totally. Why Reece over Narawa? Surely not just “work rate”.
Razor said he wanted to give every one in the original squad a run.
Reece only had a rrrr….
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@voodoo said in All Blacks v France III:
@Nepia said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
Too many Chiefs
Too many Reece's.
Totally. Why Reece over Narawa? Surely not just “work rate”.
Razor said he wanted to give every one in the original squad a run.
Reece only had a rrrr….
Reece already had a run for a few minutes. That's enough for me.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@voodoo said in All Blacks v France III:
@Nepia said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
Too many Chiefs
Too many Reece's.
Totally. Why Reece over Narawa? Surely not just “work rate”.
Razor said he wanted to give every one in the original squad a run.
Reece only had a rrrr….
Reece already had a run for a few minutes. That's enough for me.
@brodean said in All Blacks v France III:
Reece already had a run for a few minutes. That's enough for me.
How wrong you are. t wasn’t even a minute….
-
@brodean said in All Blacks v France III:
Reece already had a run for a few minutes. That's enough for me.
How wrong you are. t wasn’t even a minute….
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@brodean said in All Blacks v France III:
Reece already had a run for a few minutes. That's enough for me.
How wrong you are. t wasn’t even a minute….
I'm still OK with that. Not convinced players are fully recovered in that time frame either.
-
@Windows97 said in All Blacks v France III:
I just hope our midfield actually does something, though if Tupaea and ALB rips the French to shreds it will probably rasie more questions than answers.
The problem is I see it is the last time the French were down here, mentally they were already on the plane for the third test.
But Fabien Galthié has intimated that the third test will be their most experienced 23 on tour.
So if they kill it - typical French already packed their bags - and if they don't...
@antipodean said in All Blacks v France III:
@Windows97 said in All Blacks v France III:
I just hope our midfield actually does something, though if Tupaea and ALB rips the French to shreds it will probably rasie more questions than answers.
The problem is I see it is the last time the French were down here, mentally they were already on the plane for the third test.
But Fabien Galthié has intimated that the third test will be their most experienced 23 on tour.
So if they kill it - typical French already packed their bags - and if they don't...
Dammed if you do and dammed if you don't really, but if they do play well it should at least put some pressure on JB and Proctor to lift their game.
-
@brodean said in All Blacks v France III:
Reece already had a run for a few minutes. That's enough for me.
How wrong you are. t wasn’t even a minute….
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@brodean said in All Blacks v France III:
Reece already had a run for a few minutes. That's enough for me.
How wrong you are. t wasn’t even a minute….
Was this some sort of record for the shortest time on the field in a test match as a starting player?
-
"But Fabien Galthié has intimated that the third test will be their most experienced 23 on tour"
Should we trust the words of a man who wears Stingray arch-villain glasses? -
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@brodean said in All Blacks v France III:
Reece already had a run for a few minutes. That's enough for me.
How wrong you are. t wasn’t even a minute….
Was this some sort of record for the shortest time on the field in a test match as a starting player?
@Windows97 said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@brodean said in All Blacks v France III:
Reece already had a run for a few minutes. That's enough for me.
How wrong you are. t wasn’t even a minute….
Was this some sort of record for the shortest time on the field in a test match as a starting player?
It wasn’t a test match and not a HIA, but I recall a match where a player did a hamstring running in the kick off
-
@antipodean said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@brodean said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@sparky said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader Finau's been disappointing in the first two Tests. If they select him, he'll need a good game to be retained in the squad for the RC.
I thought the first test he wasn’t too bad. Came on and did a number of things that had a positive impact.
Last weekend wasn’t great. He just needs one of those tests where he knuckles down and makes his tackles, create havoc at the tackle by playing quick off set piece and then provides at least 5-7 runs.
Well he had to play lock. He was fine. He contributed well to the breakdown, lineout, scrum and was accurate.
Kirifi was more of worry. Came on and gave away 3 penalties and turned the ball over within 20 minutes.
It wasn’t the position that was the problem as the set piece wasn’t the issue. It was more about what he was and wasn’t doing around the park.
Possibly because he's busy trying to come to terms with being a blindside flanker at this level and then was shoved into playing another.
It's this level of midwittery that has me worried about the coaches.
I don’t see the problem. We had subbed off Patty and moved Vaa’i to lock. Nothing we haven’t seen before and nothing that previous coaches haven’t done.
The unfortunate thing was losing Vaa’i to the HIA a few minutes later. Vaa’i failed his HiA and we had to being CLW back on.
The question is, was Patty injured and that’s why he didn’t come back on. He is now under a cloud for test 3.
That’s just unfortunate luck really. From a set piece perspective we were okay with Finau covering for the loss of two locks.
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@antipodean said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@brodean said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@sparky said in All Blacks v France III:
@ACT-Crusader Finau's been disappointing in the first two Tests. If they select him, he'll need a good game to be retained in the squad for the RC.
I thought the first test he wasn’t too bad. Came on and did a number of things that had a positive impact.
Last weekend wasn’t great. He just needs one of those tests where he knuckles down and makes his tackles, create havoc at the tackle by playing quick off set piece and then provides at least 5-7 runs.
Well he had to play lock. He was fine. He contributed well to the breakdown, lineout, scrum and was accurate.
Kirifi was more of worry. Came on and gave away 3 penalties and turned the ball over within 20 minutes.
It wasn’t the position that was the problem as the set piece wasn’t the issue. It was more about what he was and wasn’t doing around the park.
Possibly because he's busy trying to come to terms with being a blindside flanker at this level and then was shoved into playing another.
It's this level of midwittery that has me worried about the coaches.
I don’t see the problem. We had subbed off Patty and moved Vaa’i to lock. Nothing we haven’t seen before and nothing that previous coaches haven’t done.
The unfortunate thing was losing Vaa’i to the HIA a few minutes later. Vaa’i failed his HiA and we had to being CLW back on.
The question is, was Patty injured and that’s why he didn’t come back on. He is now under a cloud for test 3.
That’s just unfortunate luck really. From a set piece perspective we were okay with Finau covering for the loss of two locks.
So he did a good job in the circumstances and hence the criticism would be misplaced, to put it mildly.
-
Question is, what will the make up be of the locks/loose forwards with Barrett, Tuipulotu and Vaa'i unavailable?
With Mcwhannel being around the squad I'd go.
- Norris
- Taukei'aho
- Lomax
- Holland
- Ah Kuoi
- Finau
- Savea
- Jacobson
\16. McAlister
17. De Groot
18. Tosi
19. McWhannel
20. Papali'iAh Kuoi is probably the same height and weight as Finau. I'd like to see a bit of extra height in the loose forwards so that means CLW and Kirifi can have a rest. After giving away 3 penalties in twenty minutes Kirifi should cool his heels anyway.
They might have Jacobson at 6 and Lio Willie at 8 with Finau on the bench covering lock but I think it's a mistake going into a test with a guy debuting and not a proper lock cover.
That kind of scenario reminds me of when we played Kaino at Soldier Field. Incidentally Finau did a better job covering lock last week than what Kaino did in Soldier Field though to be fair Ireland had that 2.1m lock Toner in that game.
Ryan and Robertson had that history of playing Grace and Gardiner at lock for the Crusaders and I'm not convinced playing loose forwards at lock is something that will translate at test level in the long run. They might have an idea in their head that Papali'i could cover lock if they don't want to bring in Mcwhannel.
-
@pakman said in All Blacks v France III:
When’s the team named?
Posted on social media around Thursday midday. Backline is posted above though
-
@pakman said in All Blacks v France III:
When’s the team named?
Posted on social media around Thursday midday. Backline is posted above though
@Landers92 said in All Blacks v France III:
@pakman said in All Blacks v France III:
When’s the team named?
Posted on social media around Thursday midday. Backline is posted above though
Accepted answer is "Thursday".
-
Question is, what will the make up be of the locks/loose forwards with Barrett, Tuipulotu and Vaa'i unavailable?
With Mcwhannel being around the squad I'd go.
- Norris
- Taukei'aho
- Lomax
- Holland
- Ah Kuoi
- Finau
- Savea
- Jacobson
\16. McAlister
17. De Groot
18. Tosi
19. McWhannel
20. Papali'iAh Kuoi is probably the same height and weight as Finau. I'd like to see a bit of extra height in the loose forwards so that means CLW and Kirifi can have a rest. After giving away 3 penalties in twenty minutes Kirifi should cool his heels anyway.
They might have Jacobson at 6 and Lio Willie at 8 with Finau on the bench covering lock but I think it's a mistake going into a test with a guy debuting and not a proper lock cover.
That kind of scenario reminds me of when we played Kaino at Soldier Field. Incidentally Finau did a better job covering lock last week than what Kaino did in Soldier Field though to be fair Ireland had that 2.1m lock Toner in that game.
Ryan and Robertson had that history of playing Grace and Gardiner at lock for the Crusaders and I'm not convinced playing loose forwards at lock is something that will translate at test level in the long run. They might have an idea in their head that Papali'i could cover lock if they don't want to bring in Mcwhannel.
@brodean said in All Blacks v France III:
Ryan and Robertson had that history of playing Grace and Gardiner at lock for the Crusaders and I'm not convinced playing loose forwards at lock is something that will translate at test level in the long run. They might have an idea in their head that Papali'i could cover lock if they don't want to bring in Mcwhannel.
If that was to be their coaching and selection genius then David Kirk should give Mark Robinson 24hours to hold them to account before sacking the lot of them.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks v France III:
@brodean said in All Blacks v France III:
Reece already had a run for a few minutes. That's enough for me.
How wrong you are. t wasn’t even a minute….
I'm still OK with that. Not convinced players are fully recovered in that time frame either.
@brodean interesting paper on ligament rupture after a concussion Effect of a concussion on anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in a general population
