Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Springboks v Italy II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
springboksitaly
91 Posts 25 Posters 1.7k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB booboo

    BTW have no issue with the "lineout" move. Just seems a little unnecessary to me.

    BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    @booboo said in Springboks v Italy II:

    BTW have no issue with the "lineout" move. Just seems a little unnecessary to me.

    Yeah I was just talking shit on that one, no issue, bloody good for a laugh though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • FrankF Offline
      FrankF Offline
      Frank
      wrote on last edited by
      #67

      Rassie just showing the world how "innovative" he is. A GENIUS I am told.

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • sparkyS Offline
        sparkyS Offline
        sparky
        wrote on last edited by
        #68

        I am not sure why the All Blacks are bothering planning to pick a team for the games against the Springboks in September. Rassie is such a bold and innovative GENIUS that he is certain to win.

        What a very clever Rassie that Rassie man is!

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • boobooB booboo

          BTW have no issue with the "lineout" move. Just seems a little unnecessary to me.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          DaGrubster
          wrote on last edited by
          #69

          @booboo said in Springboks v Italy II:

          BTW have no issue with the "lineout" move. Just seems a little unnecessary to me.

          I think the element of surprise was the biggest facror here. Plus it adds to the legend of Rassie the innovator even though it sounds like it was done by a school team

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • boobooB booboo

            @OomPB said in Springboks v Italy II:

            Rassie coaching staff include an international ref. Paul Roos u19B coach surely would ticked all the boxes before trying it.

            I know the South African translation of the WR Law consists solely and entirely of "Whatever Rassie says". But if you can find the clause in the law book that nullifies Law 9 FOUL PLAY, UNFAIR PLAY 7. A player must not a. Intentionally infringe any law of the game I'd be appreciative.

            OomPBO Offline
            OomPBO Offline
            OomPB
            wrote on last edited by OomPB
            #70

            @booboo You cant blame us. We suffered for a very long time under coaches. The fact that Rassie and his coaches are prepared to scan u19C schools games for new ideas are remarkable. Luckily in South Africa all our main schools sport are covered by Super Schools, from u14A-u19H teams.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Mr FishM Offline
              Mr FishM Offline
              Mr Fish
              wrote on last edited by Mr Fish
              #71

              Imagine the collective meltdown amongst New Zealanders if Rassie decided to take a B-side over during the Rugby Championship. Ultimate fuckery, striking while the iron is hot.

              ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • Mr FishM Mr Fish

                Imagine the collective meltdown amongst New Zealanders if Rassie decided to take a B-side over during the Rugby Championship. Ultimate fuckery, striking while the iron is hot.

                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                ACT Crusader
                wrote on last edited by
                #72

                @Mr-Fish said in Springboks v Italy II:

                Imagine the collective meltdown amongst New Zealanders if Rassie decided to take a B-side over during the Rugby Championship. Ultimate fuckery, striking while the iron is hot.

                It’s only New Zealand….

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • PNP Offline
                  PNP Offline
                  PN
                  wrote on last edited by PN
                  #73

                  Looks like both moves are soon to be outlawed after discussion with URC head of referees:

                  Canes4lifeC boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • PNP PN

                    Looks like both moves are soon to be outlawed after discussion with URC head of referees:

                    Canes4lifeC Offline
                    Canes4lifeC Offline
                    Canes4life
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #74

                    @PN said in Springboks v Italy II:

                    Looks like both moves are soon to be outlawed after discussion with URC head of referees:

                    The stupid thing was, the South African player was well off side when they kicked-off and forced a scrum. It should have been a penalty on halfway for Italy.

                    PNP 1 Reply Last reply
                    4
                    • Canes4lifeC Canes4life

                      @PN said in Springboks v Italy II:

                      Looks like both moves are soon to be outlawed after discussion with URC head of referees:

                      The stupid thing was, the South African player was well off side when they kicked-off and forced a scrum. It should have been a penalty on halfway for Italy.

                      PNP Offline
                      PNP Offline
                      PN
                      wrote on last edited by PN
                      #75

                      @Canes4life said in Springboks v Italy II:

                      @PN said in Springboks v Italy II:

                      Looks like both moves are soon to be outlawed after discussion with URC head of referees:

                      The stupid thing was, the South African player was well off side when they kicked-off and forced a scrum. It should have been a penalty on halfway for Italy.

                      Yeah that's pretty much what all the referees have said on review. The thing is though, the kicker will just kick the ball out on the full to get the same result, and that will be much harder to police whether intentional or not. Even then, with a perceived scrum advantage, is it that big of a deal? Just give the team the option of starting the game with an opponent scrum feed on the 50, or standard kickoff. (Variation in our game is good, I reckon)

                      The lifting pod in general play had more of a chance of becoming mainstream if untouched with how effective it is.

                      Will be interesting if we see either move again before the wording is amended.

                      ToddyT boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
                      1
                      • PNP PN

                        @Canes4life said in Springboks v Italy II:

                        @PN said in Springboks v Italy II:

                        Looks like both moves are soon to be outlawed after discussion with URC head of referees:

                        The stupid thing was, the South African player was well off side when they kicked-off and forced a scrum. It should have been a penalty on halfway for Italy.

                        Yeah that's pretty much what all the referees have said on review. The thing is though, the kicker will just kick the ball out on the full to get the same result, and that will be much harder to police whether intentional or not. Even then, with a perceived scrum advantage, is it that big of a deal? Just give the team the option of starting the game with an opponent scrum feed on the 50, or standard kickoff. (Variation in our game is good, I reckon)

                        The lifting pod in general play had more of a chance of becoming mainstream if untouched with how effective it is.

                        Will be interesting if we see either move again before the wording is amended.

                        ToddyT Online
                        ToddyT Online
                        Toddy
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #76
                        This post is deleted!
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • canefanC Offline
                          canefanC Offline
                          canefan
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #77

                          It was pretty arrogant to make it so obvious. As you say they could have just kicked it out on the full

                          ToddyT PNP 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • canefanC canefan

                            It was pretty arrogant to make it so obvious. As you say they could have just kicked it out on the full

                            ToddyT Online
                            ToddyT Online
                            Toddy
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #78

                            @canefan said in Springboks v Italy II:

                            It was pretty arrogant to make it so obvious. As you say they could have just kicked it out on the full

                            What's the law if it goes out on the full?

                            canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • canefanC canefan

                              It was pretty arrogant to make it so obvious. As you say they could have just kicked it out on the full

                              PNP Offline
                              PNP Offline
                              PN
                              wrote on last edited by PN
                              #79

                              @canefan said in Springboks v Italy II:

                              It was pretty arrogant to make it so obvious. As you say they could have just kicked it out on the full

                              I guess they didn't want it to be perceived as an error as I'm not sure anyone would have known it was intentional otherwise. Wouldn't be surprised if they do just that this weekend to prove a point.

                              Rassie may just be using this as a platform for calling out intentional skew scrumfeeds as being on par with 'against the spirit of the game' (which is why the fk -> pk) for undermining the contest at scrumtime.

                              boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ToddyT Toddy

                                @canefan said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                It was pretty arrogant to make it so obvious. As you say they could have just kicked it out on the full

                                What's the law if it goes out on the full?

                                canefanC Offline
                                canefanC Offline
                                canefan
                                wrote on last edited by canefan
                                #80

                                @Toddy said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                @canefan said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                It was pretty arrogant to make it so obvious. As you say they could have just kicked it out on the full

                                What's the law if it goes out on the full?

                                Free kick or scrum? Did the Italians have the FK option to them in this instance?

                                boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • PNP PN

                                  Looks like both moves are soon to be outlawed after discussion with URC head of referees:

                                  boobooB Do not disturb
                                  boobooB Do not disturb
                                  booboo
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #81

                                  @PN said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                  Looks like both moves are soon to be outlawed after discussion with URC head of referees:

                                  What a load of absolute fucking garbage.

                                  The kick off shit is not "about to be outlawed": it already was.

                                  Fucking typical play acting South Africans playing with language to feel "victimised".

                                  They cheated (and knew it, but got away with it because the ref fucked up because is scared of the "innovation") and they're being call out on it.

                                  Reminds me of some other headlines I see about sport recently where definitions are redefined to suit the narrative.

                                  Fuck all the way off.

                                  antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • PNP PN

                                    @Canes4life said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                    @PN said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                    Looks like both moves are soon to be outlawed after discussion with URC head of referees:

                                    The stupid thing was, the South African player was well off side when they kicked-off and forced a scrum. It should have been a penalty on halfway for Italy.

                                    Yeah that's pretty much what all the referees have said on review. The thing is though, the kicker will just kick the ball out on the full to get the same result, and that will be much harder to police whether intentional or not. Even then, with a perceived scrum advantage, is it that big of a deal? Just give the team the option of starting the game with an opponent scrum feed on the 50, or standard kickoff. (Variation in our game is good, I reckon)

                                    The lifting pod in general play had more of a chance of becoming mainstream if untouched with how effective it is.

                                    Will be interesting if we see either move again before the wording is amended.

                                    boobooB Do not disturb
                                    boobooB Do not disturb
                                    booboo
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #82

                                    @PN said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                    @Canes4life said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                    @PN said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                    Looks like both moves are soon to be outlawed after discussion with URC head of referees:

                                    The stupid thing was, the South African player was well off side when they kicked-off and forced a scrum. It should have been a penalty on halfway for Italy.

                                    Yeah that's pretty much what all the referees have said on review. The thing is though, the kicker will just kick the ball out on the full to get the same result, and that will be much harder to police whether intentional or not. Even then, with a perceived scrum advantage, is it that big of a deal? Just give the team the option of starting the game with an opponent scrum feed on the 50, or standard kickoff. (Variation in our game is good, I reckon)

                                    The lifting pod in general play had more of a chance of becoming mainstream if untouched with how effective it is.

                                    Will be interesting if we see either move again before the wording is amended.

                                    Harder to execute so it looks "accidental".

                                    Wording is not required to be amended. Deliberate offending is already covered.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • canefanC canefan

                                      @Toddy said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                      @canefan said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                      It was pretty arrogant to make it so obvious. As you say they could have just kicked it out on the full

                                      What's the law if it goes out on the full?

                                      Free kick or scrum? Did the Italians have the FK option to them in this instance?

                                      boobooB Do not disturb
                                      boobooB Do not disturb
                                      booboo
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #83

                                      @canefan said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                      @Toddy said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                      @canefan said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                      It was pretty arrogant to make it so obvious. As you say they could have just kicked it out on the full

                                      What's the law if it goes out on the full?

                                      Free kick or scrum? Did the Italians have the FK option to them in this instance?

                                      https://passport.world.rugby/laws-of-the-game/

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • PNP PN

                                        @canefan said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                        It was pretty arrogant to make it so obvious. As you say they could have just kicked it out on the full

                                        I guess they didn't want it to be perceived as an error as I'm not sure anyone would have known it was intentional otherwise. Wouldn't be surprised if they do just that this weekend to prove a point.

                                        Rassie may just be using this as a platform for calling out intentional skew scrumfeeds as being on par with 'against the spirit of the game' (which is why the fk -> pk) for undermining the contest at scrumtime.

                                        boobooB Do not disturb
                                        boobooB Do not disturb
                                        booboo
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #84

                                        @PN said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                        @canefan said in Springboks v Italy II:

                                        It was pretty arrogant to make it so obvious. As you say they could have just kicked it out on the full

                                        I guess they didn't want it to be perceived as an error as I'm not sure anyone would have known it was intentional otherwise. Wouldn't be surprised if they do just that this weekend to prove a point.

                                        Rassie may just be using this as a platform for calling out intentional skew scrumfeeds as being on par with 'against the spirit of the game' (which is why the fk -> pk) for undermining the contest at scrumtime.

                                        Yeah. OK. Yay Rassie. Hero of our time.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • Billy WebbB Offline
                                          Billy WebbB Offline
                                          Billy Webb
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #85

                                          I am deliberately going to ignore debating the legality or "spirit" of each of the 2 new tricks the Boks put on show in this game.

                                          What I am pleased about, is that a team that was derided for playing boring, structured (read: kick, chase, defend) rugby in 2019 has now reached a point where they try out all sorts of (granted sometimes a bit daft) stuff.
                                          Fun to watch, but yes, not the be-all and end-all of what will win test matches.

                                          PNP nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search