• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Boks vs Wallabies 2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
springboksaustralia
260 Posts 39 Posters 3.2k Views
Boks vs Wallabies 2
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #25

    @sparky said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    Hey Rassie, keep leaving out PSDT please.

    he's injured

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #26

    @No-Quarter said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    10 changes after a loss is crazy, yeah they have a lot of depth but it'll be interesting to see how cohesive they are. Aus will be fired up, 2/2 in SA would be incredible. Might actually get up for this one.

    Would be the first time since 1963 and to do it without someone of Catchpole's calibre would be immense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #27

    @voodoo said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    @sparky said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    Hey Rassie, keep leaving out PSDT please.

    he's injured

    They seem to have been pretty lucky with injuries to their top side to date, but now him and Kolisi? Jeez

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to barbarian on last edited by NTA
    #28

    @barbarian Anyway I already bought tickets for Wallabies v Pumas at the SFS next month, so blow that out your arse 😜

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to barbarian on last edited by canefan
    #29

    @barbarian said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    Christ sake Nick, is there genuinely a Wallaby game you haven't tipped the opposition by 50? Getting tiresome.

    We have as good a chance in this as any. We have belief, and the feeling we're playing with house money now.

    And I don't know how you can think the loss of Kolisi, Esterhuizen and the benching of Etzebeth is a good thing for the Boks. To me this is a lesser version of their side last week. Which doesn't mean they will lose, but the idea we will get flogged is mindlessly pessimistic.

    One man's overwhelming pessimism is another man's strong jinx game, or defensive mechanism. It's the hope that kills

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #30

    @canefan said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    One man's overwhelming pessimism is another man's strong jinx game, or defensive mechanism. It's the hope that kills

    I see what you (Canes supporter) did there...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #31

    @NTA said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    That Bok team might not be their best in terms of individuals. Or cohesion as a unit.

    However they're going back to the blueprint: kick the skin off it and pressure us up the right end of the park. They won't care if we actually take the high balls - as soon as a toe touches the ground they'll be looking to put in a massive shot and get us gunshy.

    There's nothing subtle about a 6-2 bench. The question is whether Schmidt responds in kind.

    Far better backline

    If the fatties can win good, clean, quick ball by taking it up the guts and tying in the Aussie loose forwards then that backline can do some damage

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #32

    @sparky said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    Hey Rassie, keep leaving out PSDT please.

    Failed HIA

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    via Reddit:
    Fun Fact: since 2019, there have been 8 matches between the 2 sides and both have won 4 each.

    2021

    πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 28 vs 26 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 30 vs 17 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦

    2022

    πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 25 vs 17 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 8 vs 24 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦

    2023

    πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ 43 vs 12 πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί

    2024

    πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 7 vs 33 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 12 vs 30 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦

    2025

    πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ 22 vs 38 πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί

    Total Score: πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 160 vs 212 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦

    Average Score: πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 20 vs 27 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    Love the presentation of that data

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to nzzp on last edited by pakman
    #35

    @nzzp said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    via Reddit:
    Fun Fact: since 2019, there have been 8 matches between the 2 sides and both have won 4 each.

    2021

    πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 28 vs 26 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 30 vs 17 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦

    2022

    πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 25 vs 17 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 8 vs 24 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦

    2023

    πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ 43 vs 12 πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί

    2024

    πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 7 vs 33 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 12 vs 30 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦

    2025

    πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ 22 vs 38 πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί

    Total Score: πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 160 vs 212 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦

    Average Score: πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί 20 vs 27 πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦

    So Dave Rennie was 3 from 4. Eddie dogshit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by booboo
    #36

    I'm picking an absolute kicking by SA this week.

    I have been wrong before though.

    Like just last week for example.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by stodders
    #37

    @MiketheSnow said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    @Dodge said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    I reckon Rassie will double down, they'll definitely try and correct the mistake of going too wide too early and will try and commit the aussies around the ruck but i reckon he's too stubborn to change their 'new total rugby' style

    This

    Doesn't need to change the 'new style', players just need to be patient and focused

    If they had done that last weekend it could have been close to 42-0 up and out of sight

    If SA improve their accuracy once they've created the space then look out Oz

    Doubling down on your "Boks should win easily in third gear" prediction from last week? πŸ˜‰

    Fact is, for all the squad depth SA have (and they do), you can only pick 23 players on the day and they still have to perform or they will get turned over. Even at home against an Oz team that was written off by nearly everyone in the Republic. Confidence is a difficult beast to control. AB teams from the past know this when they have played cannon fodder in the world cup pool games only to meet an opponent up for the fight in the knockout stages. You have to earn every win. There's no God given right.

    SA isn't as far ahead of the chasing pack (if at all) as some of their supporters believe, which is why the fall to Earth has been so profound this week. They still have a very good team and a great coach.

    They will be dangerous this week because they will be desperate to atone for the embarrassment of last week. Not because they lost to Oz (no embarrassment there), but because for the second half they barely looked like they could compete at home and almost looked lost. That will sting. The over-confidence will be gone.

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to stodders on last edited by
    #38

    @stodders said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    @MiketheSnow said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    @Dodge said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    I reckon Rassie will double down, they'll definitely try and correct the mistake of going too wide too early and will try and commit the aussies around the ruck but i reckon he's too stubborn to change their 'new total rugby' style

    This

    Doesn't need to change the 'new style', players just need to be patient and focused

    If they had done that last weekend it could have been close to 42-0 up and out of sight

    If SA improve their accuracy once they've created the space then look out Oz

    Doubling down on your "Boks should win easily in third gear" prediction from last week? πŸ˜‰

    Fact is, for all the squad depth SA have (and they do), you can only pick 23 players on the day and they still have to perform or they will get turned over. Even at home against an Oz team that was written off by nearly everyone in the Republic. Confidence is a difficult beast to control. AB teams from the past know this when they have played cannon fodder in the world cup pool games only to meet an opponent up for the fight in the knockout stages. You have to earn every win. There's no God given right.

    SA isn't as far ahead of the chasing pack (if at all) as some of their supporters believe, which is why the fall to Earth has been so profound this week. They still have a very good team and a great coach.

    They will be dangerous this week because they will be desperate to atone for the embarrassment of last week. Not because they lost to Oz (no embarrassment there), but because for the second half they barely looked like they could compete at home and almost looked lost. That will sting. The over-confidence will be gone.

    Yep

    That was a great comeback from Australia helped by some really ropey refereeing and dumb, dumb SA attack play

    This weekend if SA play smart rugby and execute the game plan they’ll win by a greater margin than OZ did last week

    boobooB barbarianB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    That is 2 great games by Australia in a row.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #40

    @nostrildamus said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    That is 2 great games by Australia in a row.

    Which is weird in itself

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Presume Joe will name team on Thursday?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #42

    Without PSDT, the SA pack will be a different beast, certainly not better.

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #43

    @MiketheSnow said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    really ropey refereeing

    Please explain?

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #44

    @cgrant said in Boks vs Wallabies 2:

    Without PSDT, the SA pack will be a different beast, certainly not better.

    Pack? Looked to me like he was playing on the left wing half that game! 😎

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Boks vs Wallabies 2
Rugby Matches
springboksaustralia
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.