• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NRL 2025

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
leaguewarriors
1.3k Posts 45 Posters 31.1k Views
NRL 2025
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote last edited by
    #1233

    the biggest implication could be at the Roosters. The names are some of the main ones

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote last edited by
    #1234

    actually the biggest story today is Xavier Savage has cracked his shoulder and is done for the year. Massive loss for the Raiders

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote last edited by Crazy Horse
    #1235

    The way my foggy night work brain understands it - In no reference whatsoever to the case against Cheese, (I have no knowledge of it other than what has been reported) in Queensland, if a telecommunication device is used to commit a crime the alleged offence is deemed to have occurred in either place - ie where the message was sent from or where the message was received. In most cases where it was received seems to be used more often.

    In regards to supplying a Dangerous Drug, merely giving your mate some weed is enough to be charged with Supplying. In theory, even passing the dutchie opens you up to a charge of supply (who hasn't done that?)

    mariner4lifeM NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to Crazy Horse last edited by
    #1236

    @Crazy-Horse said in NRL 2025:

    even passing the dutchie opens you up to a charge of supply (who hasn't done that?)

    only to the left

    (also that seems fucking stupid to me)

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote last edited by
    #1237

    but based on that i wonder what the defense they are so confident of is?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to mariner4life last edited by
    #1238

    @mariner4life said in NRL 2025:

    @Crazy-Horse said in NRL 2025:

    even passing the dutchie opens you up to a charge of supply (who hasn't done that?)

    only to the left

    (also that seems fucking stupid to me)

    Fucking stupid to me too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    wrote last edited by bayimports
    #1239

    Seems like a storm in a tea cup. I think I would be more concerned with outright tanking with Penrith set to name juniors in first grade, up to 16 changes potentially

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Crazy Horse last edited by
    #1240

    @Crazy-Horse said in NRL 2025:

    The way my foggy night work brain understands it - In no reference whatsoever to the case against Cheese, (I have no knowledge of it other than what has been reported) in Queensland, if a telecommunication device is used to commit a crime the alleged offence is deemed to have occurred in either place - ie where the message was sent from or where the message was received. In most cases where it was received seems to be used more often.

    In regards to supplying a Dangerous Drug, merely giving your mate some weed is enough to be charged with Supplying. In theory, even passing the dutchie opens you up to a charge of supply (who hasn't done that?)

    As a copper/ex copper do you think any non "celebrity" would be getting charged for this? If there were messages from me on that phone trying to hook my Brisbane based cousins up I highly doubt I'd be facing any charges.

    (For full disclosure I have no idea how to get coke in either Sydney or Brisbane/Coasts 🙂 ).

    Crazy HorseC M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to Nepia last edited by
    #1241

    @Nepia said in NRL 2025:

    @Crazy-Horse said in NRL 2025:

    The way my foggy night work brain understands it - In no reference whatsoever to the case against Cheese, (I have no knowledge of it other than what has been reported) in Queensland, if a telecommunication device is used to commit a crime the alleged offence is deemed to have occurred in either place - ie where the message was sent from or where the message was received. In most cases where it was received seems to be used more often.

    In regards to supplying a Dangerous Drug, merely giving your mate some weed is enough to be charged with Supplying. In theory, even passing the dutchie opens you up to a charge of supply (who hasn't done that?)

    As a copper/ex copper do you think any non "celebrity" would be getting charged for this? If there were messages from me on that phone trying to hook my Brisbane based cousins up I highly doubt I'd be facing any charges.

    (For full disclosure I have no idea how to get coke in either Sydney or Brisbane/Coasts 🙂 ).

    I think there is a good chance they would be getting charged, if not drug diverted ( depending on the offence). Cops tend to be more willing to take action with drug offences because the Drug Misuse Act provides police with protection from having costs awarded against them for failed prosecutions.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Crazy Horse last edited by
    #1242

    @Crazy-Horse said in NRL 2025:

    @Nepia said in NRL 2025:

    @Crazy-Horse said in NRL 2025:

    The way my foggy night work brain understands it - In no reference whatsoever to the case against Cheese, (I have no knowledge of it other than what has been reported) in Queensland, if a telecommunication device is used to commit a crime the alleged offence is deemed to have occurred in either place - ie where the message was sent from or where the message was received. In most cases where it was received seems to be used more often.

    In regards to supplying a Dangerous Drug, merely giving your mate some weed is enough to be charged with Supplying. In theory, even passing the dutchie opens you up to a charge of supply (who hasn't done that?)

    As a copper/ex copper do you think any non "celebrity" would be getting charged for this? If there were messages from me on that phone trying to hook my Brisbane based cousins up I highly doubt I'd be facing any charges.

    (For full disclosure I have no idea how to get coke in either Sydney or Brisbane/Coasts 🙂 ).

    I think there is a good chance they would be getting charged, if not drug diverted ( depending on the offence). Cops tend to be more willing to take action with drug offences because the Drug Misuse Act provides police with protection from having costs awarded against them for failed prosecutions.

    Really? I'd have thought that the dealer would be the guy they were going after and wouldn't bother with me sending a group text to hook my cousins up.

    Joh Biejke is gone but the police state still exists. 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mohikamo
    replied to Nepia last edited by
    #1243

    @Nepia

    The key thing here I think is whether the names of Smith's Sunshine Coast cousies are guna come out.
    Wonder what the attitude of the cops is to that.

    Friend of mine got busted when he was scoring for everyone for a weekend away.
    That made him a supplier. The cops love that they can leverage off that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    MacDazzler
    wrote last edited by
    #1244

    Knights coach O'Brien set to be sacked finally.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to MacDazzler last edited by
    #1245

    @MacDazzler said in NRL 2025:

    Knights coach O'Brien set to be sacked finally.

    interestingly he is going to "step down"

    (ie he's sacked but for less than the contracted pay out figure)

    If they immediately promote their attack coach which has the Knights with the least points scored in the comp then Newcastle fans might actually stop caring.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote last edited by
    #1246

    The Cowboys have missed the boat here, by hanging on to Toddy for the first 6 rounds of next year before they wake the fuck up and realise he can't get his teams to compete in the grind, they will have missed the boat with a decent replacement.

    A B 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • A Online
    A Online
    African Monkey
    replied to mariner4life last edited by
    #1247

    @mariner4life said in NRL 2025:

    The Cowboys have missed the boat here, by hanging on to Toddy for the first 6 rounds of next year before they wake the fuck up and realise he can't get his teams to compete in the grind, they will have missed the boat with a decent replacement.

    Sometimes you're just better off losing. These last couple of weeks could be saving Payten's job.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    MacDazzler
    replied to mariner4life last edited by
    #1248

    @mariner4life Both O'Brien and Green are managed by that fluffybunny Isaac Moses.

    Moses definitely prepared to destroy a another club.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    replied to mariner4life last edited by
    #1249

    @mariner4life said in NRL 2025:

    The Cowboys have missed the boat here, by hanging on to Toddy for the first 6 rounds of next year before they wake the fuck up and realize he can't get his teams to compete in the grind, they will have missed the boat with a decent replacement.

    Yeah agree with you, going to be a few new coaches next year and waiting six months isnt going to help if you have to go to the market again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote last edited by canefan
    #1250

    Fuuuuucccckkkkk. Who the hell missed that tackle in the in goal?

    U 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    UpTheHarbs
    replied to canefan last edited by
    #1251

    @canefan That run from Addo-Carr though

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to UpTheHarbs last edited by
    #1252

    @UpTheHarbs said in NRL 2025:

    @canefan That run from Addo-Carr though

    The ABs need that kind of gas 🥹

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

NRL 2025
Sports Talk
leaguewarriors
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.