• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v Springboks I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.5k Posts 109 Posters 9.8k Views
All Blacks v Springboks I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote last edited by akan004
    #241

    Not having Clarke is a big risk as he looked pretty sharp yesterday. With rain forecasted there's going to be plenty of contestable kicking from Williams and Pollard, and the game will be a little bit slower which would have suited Clarke after a long layoff.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kidcalder
    wrote last edited by
    #242

    Yip why not play Clarke? Giving him another chance to pick up an injury at NPC....

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    replied to pakman last edited by
    #243

    @pakman said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/360807594/timoci-tavatavanawai-ruled-out-rugby-championship-cam-roigard-miss-another-month

    Could have done with seeing Tavatavanawai start in one of the 5 games we played already this year.

    For god sake.

    Released to NPC to get injured.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Jet last edited by
    #244

    @Jet said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    Released to NPC to get injured.

    Aren't we all complaining players should all be playing NPC not put in cotton wool?

    1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote last edited by
    #245

    Lomax hasn't played at all but he gets selected, while Clarke at least had a game and looked fairly decent yet he's been left out. It doesn't add up. Wouldn't bet against an unchanged backline again. Looks like there will be a party at Tony Brown's place this Saturday.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote last edited by Chris
    #246

    It all points to the only changes for Saturday will be Lomax back in the 23 and a change at HB if Ratima is ruled out.

    Edit
    and if that is the case and the ABs lose massive meltdown all over the place.

    gt12G KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Chris last edited by
    #247

    @Chris said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    It all points to the only changes for Saturday will be Lomax back in the 23 and a change at HB if Ratima is ruled out.

    Edit
    and if that is the case and the ABs lose massive meltdown all over the place.

    Pretty deservedly so if they roll out the same team and get humped at Eden Park. TBH, there should be have big conversations about the whole coaching team in that case.

    However, if they roll out (roughly) the same team and the team beats the Boks, it should take a lot of pressure off the coaching team.

    Ballsy.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Chris last edited by
    #248

    @Chris I would think Narawa at least would come into reckoning at wing

    ChrisC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ShaquilleOatmealS Offline
    ShaquilleOatmealS Offline
    ShaquilleOatmeal
    wrote last edited by ShaquilleOatmeal
    #249

    The recent All Blacks social media injury update post states Clarke is only available for the second South Africa test. Does that guarantee Ioane on the left wing and Proctor at centre this week?

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to KiwiMurph last edited by
    #250
    This post is deleted!
    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Chris last edited by
    #251
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to KiwiMurph last edited by
    #252

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    @Chris I would think Narawa at least would come into reckoning at wing

    I can’t see them doing that either.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to gt12 last edited by Chris
    #253

    @gt12 said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    @Chris said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    It all points to the only changes for Saturday will be Lomax back in the 23 and a change at HB if Ratima is ruled out.

    Edit
    and if that is the case and the ABs lose massive meltdown all over the place.

    Pretty deservedly so if they roll out the same team and get humped at Eden Park. TBH, there should be have big conversations about the whole coaching team in that case.

    However, if they roll out (roughly) the same team and the team beats the Boks, it should take a lot of pressure off the coaching team.

    Ballsy.

    If that happens then any flak will be well deserved.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to ShaquilleOatmeal last edited by
    #254

    @ShaquilleOatmeal said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    The recent All Blacks social media injury update post states Clarke is only available for the second South Africa test. Does that guarantee Ioane on the left wing and Proctor at centre this week?

    That gets my goat that injury update - a guy is only available to play in 2 weeks time when he's already back playing? If he's not right, he shouldn't be playing. If he is right, he's available.

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SBW1
    wrote last edited by
    #255

    LF coming into the squad as injury cover.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to reprobate last edited by Canes4life
    #256

    @reprobate said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    @ShaquilleOatmeal said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    The recent All Blacks social media injury update post states Clarke is only available for the second South Africa test. Does that guarantee Ioane on the left wing and Proctor at centre this week?

    That gets my goat that injury update - a guy is only available to play in 2 weeks time when he's already back playing? If he's not right, he shouldn't be playing. If he is right, he's available.

    He looked in pretty good nick yesterday, get him out there ffs. This is not a stab at Clarke because if he had the choice, I'm sure he would jump at the chance to play on Saturday, but how soft have the All Blacks become?

    Razor's response to last week's loss against the Argies summed up the limp nature of this side atm. Instead of getting all available players on the park in the latest round of the NPC, he felt they needed a week off, time with their families to reset etc etc... fuck that. Most of the players just had a month off prior to the RC, unless injured, all players should have been on the paddock playing for their provinces. Clearly some players are short of gallop and would benefit with more time on the field. Some of these ABs have had far too much time not playing rugby lately.

    ShaquilleOatmealS 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ShaquilleOatmealS Offline
    ShaquilleOatmealS Offline
    ShaquilleOatmeal
    replied to Canes4life last edited by
    #257

    @Canes4life said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    @reprobate said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    @ShaquilleOatmeal said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    The recent All Blacks social media injury update post states Clarke is only available for the second South Africa test. Does that guarantee Ioane on the left wing and Proctor at centre this week?

    That gets my goat that injury update - a guy is only available to play in 2 weeks time when he's already back playing? If he's not right, he shouldn't be playing. If he is right, he's available.

    He looked in pretty good nick yesterday, get him out there ffs. This is not a stab at Clarke because if he had the choice, I'm sure he would jump at the chance to play on Saturday, but how soft have the All Blacks become?

    Razor's response to last week's loss against the Argies summed up the limp nature of this side atm. Instead of getting all available players on the park in the latest round of the NPC, he felt they needed a week off, time with their families to reset etc etc... fuck that. Most of the players just had a month off prior to the RC, unless injured, all players should have been on the paddock playing for their provinces. Clearly some players are short of gallop and would benefit with more time on the field. Some of these ABs have had far too much time not playing rugby lately.

    Preston was lined up to play and was pulled because they expect he'll be needed this week. When was the last time he saw any significant game time?

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to ShaquilleOatmeal last edited by
    #258

    @ShaquilleOatmeal said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    @Canes4life said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    @reprobate said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    @ShaquilleOatmeal said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    The recent All Blacks social media injury update post states Clarke is only available for the second South Africa test. Does that guarantee Ioane on the left wing and Proctor at centre this week?

    That gets my goat that injury update - a guy is only available to play in 2 weeks time when he's already back playing? If he's not right, he shouldn't be playing. If he is right, he's available.

    He looked in pretty good nick yesterday, get him out there ffs. This is not a stab at Clarke because if he had the choice, I'm sure he would jump at the chance to play on Saturday, but how soft have the All Blacks become?

    Razor's response to last week's loss against the Argies summed up the limp nature of this side atm. Instead of getting all available players on the park in the latest round of the NPC, he felt they needed a week off, time with their families to reset etc etc... fuck that. Most of the players just had a month off prior to the RC, unless injured, all players should have been on the paddock playing for their provinces. Clearly some players are short of gallop and would benefit with more time on the field. Some of these ABs have had far too much time not playing rugby lately.

    Preston was lined up to play and was pulled because they expect he'll be needed this week. When was the last time he saw any significant game time?

    100%, there’s always a risk that a player gets injured, that’s just the nature of the game. The downside of them not playing is they’ll be undercooked if called upon. Case in point with Preston. Let’s hope Clarke gets another game for Auckland this week, better to have him getting minutes under his belt than just sitting on the sideline scratching his nuts.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote last edited by sparky
    #259

    The side I'd pick is

    1. De Groot
    2. Taylor
    3. Newell
    4. S. Barrett
    5. Holland
    6. Vaii
    7. A. Savea
    8. Sititi
    9. K. Preston
    10. DMac
    11. C.Clarke
    12. J. Barrett
    13. R. Ioane
    14. W. Jordan
    15. R. Love

    1. Taukei'aho
    2. T. Williams
    3. Lomax
    4. S. Darry
    5. S. Parker
    6. Lakai
    7. Christie
    8. Tupaea
    GrooterG ChrisC 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • GrooterG Offline
    GrooterG Offline
    Grooter
    replied to sparky last edited by
    #260

    @sparky I actually do think Beauden still has top value as a bench player, saved our bacon last year at Eden Park against England. Not overly excited when he is named to start tho

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

All Blacks v Springboks I
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.