• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v Springboks I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.5k Posts 109 Posters 9.8k Views
All Blacks v Springboks I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    wrote last edited by
    #599

    To be fair to the Boks, this fiddling at the back of the ruck shite is just nonsense.

    If Finlay is touching the ball with his hands he should be fair game.

    canefanC KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to bayimports last edited by
    #600

    @bayimports said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    @canefan said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    @JayCee said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    That kick sealed Beauden's selection for the rest of the year

    Clearly he can do it. It's our shit tactics that were holding us back. JB and WJ have both kicked long so far

    BB is just as inconsistent unfortunately however at least that was from his premier hit list

    When the play broke down vs Argentina, BB thru a hospital pass. The long kick is far better

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    wrote last edited by
    #601

    Loving the balance of the loosies for once

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Jet last edited by
    #602

    @Jet said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    To be fair to the Boks, this fiddling at the back of the ruck shite is just nonsense.

    If Finlay is touching the ball with his hands he should be fair game.

    Not according to the current rules. All 9s do it

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Jet last edited by
    #603

    @Jet said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    To be fair to the Boks, this fiddling at the back of the ruck shite is just nonsense.

    If Finlay is touching the ball with his hands he should be fair game.

    You can hate the laws but no excuse for not playing to them

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    replied to canefan last edited by
    #604

    @canefan said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    @Jet said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    To be fair to the Boks, this fiddling at the back of the ruck shite is just nonsense.

    If Finlay is touching the ball with his hands he should be fair game.

    Not according to the current rules. All 9s do it

    I know. It’s a crap rule.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote last edited by
    #605

    Huge tackle by Parker

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    wrote last edited by
    #606

    That's a harsh penalty at the scrum as both packs slipped.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote last edited by
    #607

    Williams is very quick.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    wrote last edited by
    #608

    The Boks loosehead went straight to ground on that scrum.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jimmyb
    wrote last edited by
    #609

    Funny how playing two locks and an actually six at six creates a better balance.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Nepia last edited by
    #610

    @Nepia said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    That's a harsh penalty at the scrum as both packs slipped.

    Not even a reset first?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote last edited by
    #611

    The whole family lacks brain cells

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote last edited by
    #612

    Did he just call obstruction on the guy that caught the ball?

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote last edited by
    #613

    Bad miss

    Should have gone to the line

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote last edited by
    #614

    That was a BS penalty everyone was going for the ball.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote last edited by
    #615

    Sounds like Dickeon is half apologising over the ref mic

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to mariner4life last edited by
    #616

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    The whole family lacks brain cells

    Yep, skills by the bucket load, but brain cells variable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Bones last edited by
    #617

    @Bones said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    Did he just call obstruction on the guy that caught the ball?

    Two players going for the ball is not allowed anymore….

    canefanC BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to KiwiMurph last edited by
    #618

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks v Springboks I:

    Sounds like Dickeon is half apologising over the ref mic

    Could have cost us 3. Fucker

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

All Blacks v Springboks I
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.