• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Womens RWC 2025

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
839 Posts 39 Posters 2.9k Views
Womens RWC 2025
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote last edited by sparky
    #782

    Outstanding commitment for Canada. Hugely competitive and determined all over the park.

    The BFs had some good moments with the ball in hand, but their defence was too passive and porous.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kidcalder
    wrote last edited by
    #783

    Yeah the girls need a Nov tour.
    Playing Oz 3 times a year doesn't cut the mustard

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote last edited by
    #784

    I will celebrate like NZ won if Canada win the final, I'd even pay for a framed photo of the commentary team at the game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kidcalder
    wrote last edited by
    #785

    Now we get penalties to even it up

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Jailbreak7J Offline
    Jailbreak7J Offline
    Jailbreak7
    wrote last edited by
    #786

    Bunting hss got to go.
    I'm sorry but tbis result isnt acceptable.
    They had the wake up call last week and still didnt get it.
    Get gone Bunting

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote last edited by
    #787

    Where were these penalties against the Canadians earlier?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote last edited by
    #788

    All over.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kidcalder
    wrote last edited by
    #789

    Canada for the final ayeeee

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote last edited by
    #790

    I'm not going to lie. I don't give a shit what happens in the rest of the tournament now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote last edited by
    #791

    Watched bits of it , ref aside , Canada just seemed better drilled in the fundamentals,

    Our girls have lots of talent but just seem a bit reliant on the miracle plays that work well on the lower tier sides

    Maybe Canada did us a favour, I suspect England would get a bit uglier., strangling us out of the game even more so

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    wrote last edited by
    #792

    Pretty average, but at least they didn't give up like our men's team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    11
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    wrote last edited by
    #793

    Well played BFs. Refused to lie down.

    Didn’t think much could top the Boks in Wellington - unimaginative dolt.

    take a bow Kevin Rouet, Tessier, Symonds, De Groote and co. Magnificent, smart, creative, ruthless rugby. 90 minutes from glory.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    wrote last edited by
    #794

    Interesting that Canada have only one squad for 15s and 7s whereas NZ had to try to integrate their 7s stars into the 15s programme - Canada looked so well drilled. Canadian 9 bossed around the rucks and De Goede is freakishly talented for a lock. Black Ferns seemed to buy every dummy in the 1st half instead of just making the tackle.

    Olsen-Baker 34 carries apparently - good engine.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote last edited by
    #795

    Canada’s forward attack was pretty good and we didn’t have anyone that could create a turnover when required.

    The slow start hurt us.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Mattasaurus last edited by
    #796

    @Mattasaurus said in Womens RWC 2025:

    @Victor-Meldrew said in Womens RWC 2025:

    Has there ever been a big game when only one side has won penalties?

    1/4 final 2007 RWC comes to mind

    I haven't, read all of the thread but I figured someone would say this because it was exactly what I was thinking. The most one-sided display of refereeing I have seen since Barnes.

    With the laws of rugby as they are, I defy any official (with both eyes open) to watch 60 minutes of a match and not see an infringement. The last time I can recall seeing it was....2007.

    Given that we couldn't catch for the first 40, we would have had trouble anyway, but the whole dynamic of the contest changes when only one side is being watched. Rugby (RWC in particular) seems to be completely political. It's bloody sad, rugby used to be my passion.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote last edited by Bovidae
    #797

    Outmuscled and outplayed. Some terrible refereeing at times but the better team deservedly won. The BF game drivers failed to fire in the face of Canadian defensive pressure.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Bovidae last edited by
    #798

    @Bovidae said in Womens RWC 2025:

    Outmuscled and outplayed. Some terrible refereeing at times but the better team deservedly won. The BF game drivers failed to fire in the face of Canadian defensive pressure.

    When you're battling to get into the game and keep getting penalised for at times almost identical infringements the opposition are rewarded for, it really hurts you when you're already struggling for possession.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    wrote last edited by
    #799

    Woodman-wickliffe seemed very under utilized. Demant seemed to kick a lot. So seemingly the continuity game plan was hindered by absence of Miller. Really impressive by Canada though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RoninWCR Offline
    RoninWCR Offline
    RoninWC
    wrote last edited by
    #800

    Worst game from the Black Ferns for ages.
    Renee Holmes should never have been in the starting side. Sure she had a couple of decent games but that was against minows. Terrible defence as she has shown her entire career.
    We played much better when she went off and Sorensen-McGee moved into fullback.
    Bremner had a shocker, continued to get in between the backs and mess things up as she has done all tournament. Demant had one of her worst games ever, disappointing in her 50th.
    In another chat group, I suggested that Portia, who hasn't looked good all tournament, in fact, hasn't looked good since the record breaking game against the US, should not have started. Leti-I'iga should have started.
    Again, we looked a lot more dangerous in the back three once Holmes went off and I think we finished the game with a back three of Waka, Leti-I'iga and Sorensen-Mcgee with Brunt and Setefano in the centres but I stand to be corrected as by then I was seeing red at the absolutely shite referring that was on display.

    Best on park for the BF's:
    Stacey Waka - WotM

    and as someone said earlier in this thread, when Stacey retires, the AB's should bring her in as catching coach!

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kidcalder
    wrote last edited by
    #801

    Renee deserved her spot, but she didn't have a great game.. poor tackle attempt yes and kick out on full.
    A shite quick throw into her I think by BSM put her under pressure .
    Last few matches in NZ and at tournament she looked great kicking wise and running plays and try assists.
    Apart from Waaka the whole backline didn't fire

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Womens RWC 2025
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.