Movie review thread...
-
@booboo I just finished listening to it.
Having watched the movie, it was painted slightly better, although none of the characters were really likeable, which ties in with the podcast.
What I didnt get from the Movie (or missed) was that the main couple, Dr. Friedrich Ritter and Dore Strauch (Law & Kirby) were having an affair in Germany, and when they decided to buggar off, for thier partners, to save face, they moved in together.
-
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
If anything if you look back on his entire catalogue and range of characters he's .. good for a meme or two...
Show us some proof!
-
@nostrildamus said in Movie review thread...:
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
If anything if you look back on his entire catalogue and range of characters he's .. good for a meme or two...
Show us some proof!
Google his filmography ( yes, my two favourite roles are probably the Tarantino ones especially the one that launched a million memes ) also brilliant in This Boys life, Gangs of New York, Shutter Island, Blood Diamond, Wolf of Wall Street......
He is a fucken good actor. One of the best in my opinion. He's done a fair few movies I'm not a fan of ( Whats Eating Gilbert Grape in particular was pretty shite ) but you can't ever fault his performances.
-
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
@nostrildamus said in Movie review thread...:
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
If anything if you look back on his entire catalogue and range of characters he's .. good for a meme or two...
Show us some proof!
Google his filmography ( yes, my two favourite roles are probably the Tarantino ones especially the one that launched a million memes ) also brilliant in This Boys life, Gangs of New York, Shutter Island, Blood Diamond, Wolf of Wall Street......
He is a fucken good actor. One of the best in my opinion. He's done a fair few movies I'm not a fan of ( Whats Eating Gilbert Grape in particular was pretty shite ) but you can't ever fault his performances.
Thank you for giving examples.
-
@nostrildamus said in Movie review thread...:
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
@nostrildamus said in Movie review thread...:
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
If anything if you look back on his entire catalogue and range of characters he's .. good for a meme or two...
Show us some proof!
Google his filmography ( yes, my two favourite roles are probably the Tarantino ones especially the one that launched a million memes ) also brilliant in This Boys life, Gangs of New York, Shutter Island, Blood Diamond, Wolf of Wall Street......
He is a fucken good actor. One of the best in my opinion. He's done a fair few movies I'm not a fan of ( Whats Eating Gilbert Grape in particular was pretty shite ) but you can't ever fault his performances.
Thank you for giving examples.
Always happy to help pal, you know that.
Ironically enough I took him more seriously after I saw him in Titanic in between looking at Kate Winslets boobs.
-
-
@canefan said in Movie review thread...:
He was very good in Catch me if you can as well
Haven't seen that in years......but concur from what I remember.
.....and even though he wasn't really too similar to the real Jordan Belfort he absolutely smashed that role out of the park. Such a huge performance ! Maybe his best ever ?
-
2002 Documentary, the Smashing Machine:
-
Not being a pedant, but the original was 1951's The Thing from Another World. It's a pretty good film in it's own right, but not a patch on Carpenter's 1982 masterpiece.
This, from the IMDB page, is pretty cool:
The skeleton crew at the South Pole Telescope station have a tradition every winter-over of watching this movie, and the other two adaptations on the very first night after the departure of the final plane of the season.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in Movie review thread...:
Not being a pedant, but the original was 1951's The Thing from Another World. It's a pretty good film in it's own right, but not a patch on Carpenter's 1982 masterpiece.
This, from the IMDB page, is pretty cool:
The skeleton crew at the South Pole Telescope station have a tradition every winter-over of watching this movie, and the other two adaptations on the very first night after the departure of the final plane of the season.
You are of course right.
I love this scene, no CGI and potentially fucken dangerous if something went wrong !
The whole room looked very flammable
-
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
The Thing 2011 and The Thing 1982.....( the prequel could have been slightly more original with its name, oh well )
Decided to watch these back to back. The original is rightfully a cult classic, an absolute masterpiece. The prequel is very good in its own right and no where near as rubbish as some claim.
2011 version. Virtually cut and paste in terms of storyline.
Better special effects obviously although maybe slightly over reliant on CGI. More obvious jump scares, more disgusting stuff ( the two guys merging together was beyond fucked up ) and the very hot Mary Elizabeth Winstead doing an amazing Ellen Riply impression.
The transition from one movie to another could not have been better done. Some nerds online point out that Lars ( guy in the chopper ) was a terrible shot but a) he had been awake for hours and was highly stressed and b) he might have hit the dog and not killed it, given it was a Thing but never mind. I also find it hard to believe the Americans would just take a dog in that a couple of Norwegians had tried to kill given there was clearly something wrong with it.....
onto the original.
Some slightly clunky looking effects but they just work. More memorable looking monsters and some fucked up deaths.
Kurt Russell and Keith David were cool as fuck, the rest of the characters on the whole were more quirky and memorable than in the prequel ( possibly cos they're actors I remember as a kid ? ) more of a sense of dread.......
The story is ultimately pretty B grade but I think the setting, paranoia etc make it oh so memorable.
Both of them have pretty open ended conclusions too, What were the ultimate fates of Kate, McCready and Childs ? ( I think the latter was human despite nerd theories claiming otherwise )
prequel - 3.5 creatures in ice out of 5 torching guys in a snowmobile
original - 4.5 games of computer chess out of 5 escaped Dogs who started the whole "thing"
Would absolutely love someone to make a third movie, although given the hit and miss nature of such ventures perhaps it’s a good "thing" it hasn't happened.
Fun fact about The Thing from 82
It was considered a box office bomb at the time, it was released in the same weekend as another sci fi ‘bomb’…. Blade RunnerJune 1982 was insane with its releases..
4th -
Star Trek II Wrath of Khan
Poltergeist11th -
E.T (went on to become the biggest box office hit of all time for a while)25th -
The Thing
Blade RunnerEasy to see why The Thing and Blade Runner never had a chance
-
@Virgil said in Movie review thread...:
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
The Thing 2011 and The Thing 1982.....( the prequel could have been slightly more original with its name, oh well )
Decided to watch these back to back. The original is rightfully a cult classic, an absolute masterpiece. The prequel is very good in its own right and no where near as rubbish as some claim.
2011 version. Virtually cut and paste in terms of storyline.
Better special effects obviously although maybe slightly over reliant on CGI. More obvious jump scares, more disgusting stuff ( the two guys merging together was beyond fucked up ) and the very hot Mary Elizabeth Winstead doing an amazing Ellen Riply impression.
The transition from one movie to another could not have been better done. Some nerds online point out that Lars ( guy in the chopper ) was a terrible shot but a) he had been awake for hours and was highly stressed and b) he might have hit the dog and not killed it, given it was a Thing but never mind. I also find it hard to believe the Americans would just take a dog in that a couple of Norwegians had tried to kill given there was clearly something wrong with it.....
onto the original.
Some slightly clunky looking effects but they just work. More memorable looking monsters and some fucked up deaths.
Kurt Russell and Keith David were cool as fuck, the rest of the characters on the whole were more quirky and memorable than in the prequel ( possibly cos they're actors I remember as a kid ? ) more of a sense of dread.......
The story is ultimately pretty B grade but I think the setting, paranoia etc make it oh so memorable.
Both of them have pretty open ended conclusions too, What were the ultimate fates of Kate, McCready and Childs ? ( I think the latter was human despite nerd theories claiming otherwise )
prequel - 3.5 creatures in ice out of 5 torching guys in a snowmobile
original - 4.5 games of computer chess out of 5 escaped Dogs who started the whole "thing"
Would absolutely love someone to make a third movie, although given the hit and miss nature of such ventures perhaps it’s a good "thing" it hasn't happened.
Fun fact about The Thing from 82
It was considered a box office bomb at the time, it was released in the same weekend as another sci fi ‘bomb’…. Blade RunnerJune 1982 was insane with its releases..
4th -
Star Trek II Wrath of Khan
Poltergeist11th -
E.T (went on to become the biggest box office hit of all time for a while)25th -
The Thing
Blade RunnerEasy to see why The Thing and Blade Runner never had a chance
Yeah the Thing was bleak, it was a movie about the middle of winter released in Summer and as you say it was competing against a movie where the Alien was loveable and cuddly. The Marketing team dropped the ball big time with that one.
It's good fun looking at the videos about who was infected and when. @Virgil do you think either of McReady or Childs was infected at the end ?
-
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
@Virgil said in Movie review thread...:
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
The Thing 2011 and The Thing 1982.....( the prequel could have been slightly more original with its name, oh well )
Decided to watch these back to back. The original is rightfully a cult classic, an absolute masterpiece. The prequel is very good in its own right and no where near as rubbish as some claim.
2011 version. Virtually cut and paste in terms of storyline.
Better special effects obviously although maybe slightly over reliant on CGI. More obvious jump scares, more disgusting stuff ( the two guys merging together was beyond fucked up ) and the very hot Mary Elizabeth Winstead doing an amazing Ellen Riply impression.
The transition from one movie to another could not have been better done. Some nerds online point out that Lars ( guy in the chopper ) was a terrible shot but a) he had been awake for hours and was highly stressed and b) he might have hit the dog and not killed it, given it was a Thing but never mind. I also find it hard to believe the Americans would just take a dog in that a couple of Norwegians had tried to kill given there was clearly something wrong with it.....
onto the original.
Some slightly clunky looking effects but they just work. More memorable looking monsters and some fucked up deaths.
Kurt Russell and Keith David were cool as fuck, the rest of the characters on the whole were more quirky and memorable than in the prequel ( possibly cos they're actors I remember as a kid ? ) more of a sense of dread.......
The story is ultimately pretty B grade but I think the setting, paranoia etc make it oh so memorable.
Both of them have pretty open ended conclusions too, What were the ultimate fates of Kate, McCready and Childs ? ( I think the latter was human despite nerd theories claiming otherwise )
prequel - 3.5 creatures in ice out of 5 torching guys in a snowmobile
original - 4.5 games of computer chess out of 5 escaped Dogs who started the whole "thing"
Would absolutely love someone to make a third movie, although given the hit and miss nature of such ventures perhaps it’s a good "thing" it hasn't happened.
Fun fact about The Thing from 82
It was considered a box office bomb at the time, it was released in the same weekend as another sci fi ‘bomb’…. Blade RunnerJune 1982 was insane with its releases..
4th -
Star Trek II Wrath of Khan
Poltergeist11th -
E.T (went on to become the biggest box office hit of all time for a while)25th -
The Thing
Blade RunnerEasy to see why The Thing and Blade Runner never had a chance
Yeah the Thing was bleak, it was a movie about the middle of winter released in Summer and as you say it was competing against a movie where the Alien was loveable and cuddly. The Marketing team dropped the ball big time with that one.
It's good fun looking at the videos about who was infected and when. @Virgil do you think either of McReady or Childs was infected at the end ?
I haven’t watched it in years I can’t remember my thoughts on the ending. Will have to check it out again
Funny enough I’ve never seen the remake.. -
@Virgil said in Movie review thread...:
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
@Virgil said in Movie review thread...:
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
The Thing 2011 and The Thing 1982.....( the prequel could have been slightly more original with its name, oh well )
Decided to watch these back to back. The original is rightfully a cult classic, an absolute masterpiece. The prequel is very good in its own right and no where near as rubbish as some claim.
2011 version. Virtually cut and paste in terms of storyline.
Better special effects obviously although maybe slightly over reliant on CGI. More obvious jump scares, more disgusting stuff ( the two guys merging together was beyond fucked up ) and the very hot Mary Elizabeth Winstead doing an amazing Ellen Riply impression.
The transition from one movie to another could not have been better done. Some nerds online point out that Lars ( guy in the chopper ) was a terrible shot but a) he had been awake for hours and was highly stressed and b) he might have hit the dog and not killed it, given it was a Thing but never mind. I also find it hard to believe the Americans would just take a dog in that a couple of Norwegians had tried to kill given there was clearly something wrong with it.....
onto the original.
Some slightly clunky looking effects but they just work. More memorable looking monsters and some fucked up deaths.
Kurt Russell and Keith David were cool as fuck, the rest of the characters on the whole were more quirky and memorable than in the prequel ( possibly cos they're actors I remember as a kid ? ) more of a sense of dread.......
The story is ultimately pretty B grade but I think the setting, paranoia etc make it oh so memorable.
Both of them have pretty open ended conclusions too, What were the ultimate fates of Kate, McCready and Childs ? ( I think the latter was human despite nerd theories claiming otherwise )
prequel - 3.5 creatures in ice out of 5 torching guys in a snowmobile
original - 4.5 games of computer chess out of 5 escaped Dogs who started the whole "thing"
Would absolutely love someone to make a third movie, although given the hit and miss nature of such ventures perhaps it’s a good "thing" it hasn't happened.
Fun fact about The Thing from 82
It was considered a box office bomb at the time, it was released in the same weekend as another sci fi ‘bomb’…. Blade RunnerJune 1982 was insane with its releases..
4th -
Star Trek II Wrath of Khan
Poltergeist11th -
E.T (went on to become the biggest box office hit of all time for a while)25th -
The Thing
Blade RunnerEasy to see why The Thing and Blade Runner never had a chance
Yeah the Thing was bleak, it was a movie about the middle of winter released in Summer and as you say it was competing against a movie where the Alien was loveable and cuddly. The Marketing team dropped the ball big time with that one.
It's good fun looking at the videos about who was infected and when. @Virgil do you think either of McReady or Childs was infected at the end ?
I haven’t watched it in years I can’t remember my thoughts on the ending. Will have to check it out again
Funny enough I’ve never seen the remake..Do so.
Not without it's flaws but a worthwhile watch even if it is kind of a remake.
The makers did their homework, in terms of continuity and fitting in with the original its pretty spot on. It fucks me off when shit like that isn't adhered to in other movies ( Why is the Space Jockey in Alien so much bigger than in Prometheus ?!?!?!? )
-
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
Space Jockey in Aliens
Could be a different species to the Engineers
Engineer | Xenopedia | Fandom
The Engineers, also known as Pilots[2] (after the individual discovered on LV-426), Space Jockeys,[3] Ossians[1] or Mala'kak,[4] were an ancient extraterrestrial species of unknown origin. They...
Eden (2024 film) - Wikipedia
The Smashing Machine: Mark Kerr (2002, John Hyams)
