• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Highlanders 2026

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
highlanders
631 Posts 53 Posters 15.5k Views
Highlanders 2026
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • GrooterG Offline
    GrooterG Offline
    Grooter
    wrote last edited by Grooter
    #600

    https://forum.silverfern.rugby/post/1045051 good that my source came in good many months later lol

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    wrote last edited by
    #601

    Quite the haul of Taranaki players forming down here.

    Now we just need to bring Pita Gus back to Dunedin.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Bovidae last edited by
    #602

    @Bovidae said in Highlanders 2026:

    @reprobate That's the problem. The Chiefs could have asked for player X from the Hurricanes or Crusaders to let Jacomb go. What would have NZR said to that?

    I'd be happy if they had asked for Godfrey to be moved on - is a 10/15 so would suit us well and would likely get more opportunities.

    As I've said before, we could have asked for Muliana (we should try to fucking sign him anyway) and a stop gap.

    Personally speaking, I think this is one area where our rugby is really unprofessional. With central contracting, the NZRU should get involved and help distribute the talent so that teams don't get caught out.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to reprobate last edited by
    #603

    @reprobate said in Highlanders 2026:

    Maybe they should loan him to the landers for 2026

    I like that idea, but is it a thing at Super level? I can't recall it happening before, but I could easily be wrong.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Crazy Horse last edited by
    #604

    @Crazy-Horse said in Highlanders 2026:

    @reprobate said in Highlanders 2026:

    Maybe they should loan him to the landers for 2026

    I like that idea, but is it a thing at Super level? I can't recall it happening before, but I could easily be wrong.

    assuming this would be with a recall if the chiefs had injuries?.....if not they might as well just release him

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Kiwiwomble last edited by
    #605

    @Kiwiwomble said in Highlanders 2026:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Highlanders 2026:

    @reprobate said in Highlanders 2026:

    Maybe they should loan him to the landers for 2026

    I like that idea, but is it a thing at Super level? I can't recall it happening before, but I could easily be wrong.

    assuming this would be with a recall if the chiefs had injuries?.....if not they might as well just release him

    If we were prepared to loan him, we’d let him go.

    If Dmac gets injured game 1, minute 1, Jacomb will start every game for us.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to gt12 last edited by
    #606

    @gt12 said in Highlanders 2026:

    Personally speaking, I think this is one area where our rugby is really unprofessional. With central contracting, the NZRU should get involved and help distribute the talent so that teams don't get caught out.

    Burnt by the Leon MacDonald to Chiefs debacle. Players also have to want to move. Maybe player exchanges will be the norm in the future.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to gt12 last edited by
    #607

    @gt12 said in Highlanders 2026:

    @Kiwiwomble said in Highlanders 2026:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Highlanders 2026:

    @reprobate said in Highlanders 2026:

    Maybe they should loan him to the landers for 2026

    I like that idea, but is it a thing at Super level? I can't recall it happening before, but I could easily be wrong.

    assuming this would be with a recall if the chiefs had injuries?.....if not they might as well just release him

    If we were prepared to loan him, we’d let him go.

    kind of what i was getting at

    i think in the days of protected players there were loans...but more recently i think ive only heard of it when the receiving team had had loads of injuries and theyve already raided the local talent

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to frugby last edited by
    #608

    @frugby said in Highlanders 2026:

    Quite the haul of Taranaki players forming down here.

    And BOP players. A lot from the 2021 Chiefs U20 squad, that won the tournament.

    Chiefs U20 photo.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    John
    wrote last edited by
    #609

    Anyone wanna buy highlanders rugby jersey fully signed by the team ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Nogusta last edited by
    #610

    @Nogusta said in Highlanders 2026:

    @frugby said in Highlanders 2026:

    @Landers92 said in Highlanders 2026:

    Spoken to a mate about this Jacomb news and he’s said it’s likely Reesjan Pasitoa has signed the dotted line also but won’t be announced just yet

    Having heard TUJ is going offshore, and Peni is off to MP, this would seem to line up.

    The only remaining question is the makeup of the loose forwards, and props.

    Think that is the backline all sorted.

    TUJ heading to Japan.
    Meihana Grindley heading to Dunedin. Dunno whether its a full or WTG.

    Seems the Clan is getting to be the to place for Naki players to go to, they are going to be my second super team I think!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to reprobate last edited by
    #611

    @reprobate said in Highlanders 2026:

    @Bovidae Look it's not simple, but it seems do-able doesn't it? At least 1, maybe 2 of those Canes sit in the stands - surely being McKenzie's backup and sitting on the bench is better for that player, and it's not a huge loss for the Canes?
    Is Simpson contracted at all?

    You’re right, Godfrey will be in stands. He’s done his ACL.

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SouthernMann
    wrote last edited by SouthernMann
    #612

    Fortunately we are now in a position similar to other NZ franchises where young guys can be eased in. There is not pressure to immediately perform.

    We are building depth. We can see what our team will be looking like in two or three years time as well. I look back to the 2022/23 sides and they looked a mess compared to what we will be running.

    If we hadn't landed Jacomb and Millar had another middling year. There would have been unnecessary pressure to put Mika Muliaina into the hot seat at 19. Which just wouldn't be fair. His signature should still be seen as a priority for the club's management. He should be the Landers U20s captain next year and will have a big involvement in the pre-season. He should not play Super next year though. He should take Robinson's full squad spot in 2027.

    With a bit of knowledge around organisational communications. There appears to be a bit of a motive around the messaging and timing of this announcement. It is not complementary of the Chiefs. Does not state Jacomb is committed to them. Does state he sees the Highlanders as his future. To me if reads as if it has been developed to ask questions about Jacomb's dedication to the Chiefs. On the face it is an unnecessary announcement. We are 16 months away from his first game for the team. This timing is about putting pressure on thr Chiefs over the next month prior to the 2026 squad announcements. This is about saying. Hey Chiefs. We have your guy. He wants to play for us, not you.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to Canes4life last edited by
    #613

    @Canes4life said in Highlanders 2026:

    @reprobate said in Highlanders 2026:

    @Bovidae Look it's not simple, but it seems do-able doesn't it? At least 1, maybe 2 of those Canes sit in the stands - surely being McKenzie's backup and sitting on the bench is better for that player, and it's not a huge loss for the Canes?
    Is Simpson contracted at all?

    You’re right, Godfrey will be in stands. He’s done his ACL.

    Pretty sure given the choice he'd take the Chiefs bench over that news mate, poor bugger.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    ploughboy
    replied to SouthernMann last edited by
    #614

    @SouthernMann said in Highlanders 2026:

    Fortunately we are now in a position similar to other NZ franchises where young guys can be eased in. There is not pressure to immediately perform.

    We are building depth. We can see what our team will be looking like in two or three years time as well. I look back to the 2022/23 sides and they looked a mess compared to what we will be running.

    If we hadn't landed Jacomb and Millar had another middling year. There would have been unnecessary pressure to put Mika Muliaina into the hot seat at 19. Which just wouldn't be fair. His signature should still be seen as a priority for the club's management. He should be the Landers U20s captain next year and will have a big involvement in the pre-season. He should not play Super next year though. He should take Robinson's full squad spot in 2027.

    With a bit of knowledge around organisational communications. There appears to be a bit of a motive around the messaging and timing of this announcement. It is not complementary of the Chiefs. Does not state Jacomb is committed to them. Does state he sees the Highlanders as his future. To me if reads as if it has been developed to ask questions about Jacomb's dedication to the Chiefs. On the face it is an unnecessary announcement. We are 16 months away from his first game for the team. This timing is about putting pressure on over the next month prior to the 2026 squad announcements. This is about saying. Hey Chiefs. We have your guy. He wants to play for us, not you.

    mate this is the professional not amateur and hopefully we are dealing with adults. the chiefs dont have to release him and if they dont he has to pull his knickers up and play to his best.If not he sits in the stands
    the chiefs want to put out the best team they can if that means he stays so be it. if they can contract a team they are happy with they can let him go.
    i get it highlanders need him but thats on them with there contracting system over last few years

    R S 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to ploughboy last edited by
    #615

    @ploughboy no they don't have to, but it's not an act of charity to invest your time in developing someone who is staying over someone who is leaving.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SouthernMann
    replied to ploughboy last edited by
    #616

    @ploughboy said in Highlanders 2026:

    @SouthernMann said in Highlanders 2026:

    Fortunately we are now in a position similar to other NZ franchises where young guys can be eased in. There is not pressure to immediately perform.

    We are building depth. We can see what our team will be looking like in two or three years time as well. I look back to the 2022/23 sides and they looked a mess compared to what we will be running.

    If we hadn't landed Jacomb and Millar had another middling year. There would have been unnecessary pressure to put Mika Muliaina into the hot seat at 19. Which just wouldn't be fair. His signature should still be seen as a priority for the club's management. He should be the Landers U20s captain next year and will have a big involvement in the pre-season. He should not play Super next year though. He should take Robinson's full squad spot in 2027.

    With a bit of knowledge around organisational communications. There appears to be a bit of a motive around the messaging and timing of this announcement. It is not complementary of the Chiefs. Does not state Jacomb is committed to them. Does state he sees the Highlanders as his future. To me if reads as if it has been developed to ask questions about Jacomb's dedication to the Chiefs. On the face it is an unnecessary announcement. We are 16 months away from his first game for the team. This timing is about putting pressure on over the next month prior to the 2026 squad announcements. This is about saying. Hey Chiefs. We have your guy. He wants to play for us, not you.

    mate this is the professional not amateur and hopefully we are dealing with adults. the chiefs dont have to release him and if they dont he has to pull his knickers up and play to his best.If not he sits in the stands
    the chiefs want to put out the best team they can if that means he stays so be it. if they can contract a team they are happy with they can let him go.
    i get it highlanders need him but thats on them with there contracting system over last few years

    I am perfectly aware we are talking about professional rugby, mate.

    This is pure game play from the Highlanders. As I said, absolutely no reason to announce an acquisition for 2027 when the player has a job with someone else for 2026.

    There are other guys they could have confirmed publicly. They chose the player who won't be suiting up for a long-long time. They chose to do this after failing behind closed doors to get the player released. The push to get him in 2026 is not over. The quotes attributed to Jacomb needed to be approved by him. They reflect his priority, publicly to be the Highlanders.

    As I've said before, in any employment situation you don't want someone working for you who wants to work for someone else.

    I agree. As a Chief he is responsible to play well for them. It is just this announcement is oddly timed and says everyone isn't playing nicely in the sandpit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote last edited by
    #617

    There’s been mixed results from NRL players when there has been an early departure announcement. Some have hit the wall, some have been sidelined despite being a clear starter, some have gone on to win premierships.

    Given how much movement there is these days, I don’t see it being an issue I don’t think it’s as black as white as not wanting to work somewhere because they have announced to go somewhere else. These players are on fixed term contracts and as such, it comes to an end and taking care of the future is not unusual.

    GrooterG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • GrooterG Offline
    GrooterG Offline
    Grooter
    replied to ACT Crusader last edited by
    #618

    @ACT-Crusader gotta hand it to your Crusaders in recent times Oli Jager & Brodie McAlister examples of players asking to be released having their wish grant 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    wrote last edited by
    #619

    This saga might just be getting started… has the potential to be the highest profile Super Rugby move in NZ history…

    Not sure I can remember anything like this before?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Highlanders 2026
Sports Talk
highlanders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.