• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

West Indies tour of NZ

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
964 Posts 44 Posters 5.2k Views
West Indies tour of NZ
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #69

    NZ needs to pick more T20 specialists rather than hope that the likes of Jamieson, Conway and Ravindra perform in a format less suited to their skills.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by Virgil
    #70

    Yup that’s why we aren’t competing as well as the other teams. The bulk of their selections are t20 specialists.
    We have a few good ones already but we need to identify more and give them a decent chance
    Given the workloads and often injury issues, it makes fuck all sense picking guys like Henry, jamieson etc in all 3 formats

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Virgil on last edited by MN5
    #71

    @Virgil said in West Indies tour of NZ:

    Yup that’s why we aren’t competing as well as the other teams. The bulk of their selections are t20 specialists.
    We have a few good ones already but we need to identify more and give them a decent chance
    Given the workloads and often injury issues l, makes fuck all sense picking guys like Henry, jamieson etc in all 3 formats

    Yep there is a lot resting on those two as guys who are massively important in the longest form of the game. I'd much rather the shits and giggles type bowlers make up the T20 squad.

    Maybe they feel Jamieson needs game time ? and that with his height and awkwardness he should be more economical ?

    Matt Henry is in the fortunate ( or unfortunate ) position of being bloody good at all three forms of the game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    wrote on last edited by
    #72

    Just watched the first over from Nelson and there is something not quite right seeing the Windies opening with a left arm off spinner.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by booboo
    #73

    114 for 3, 12.3 overs. Conway gone by direct hit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #74

    Bracewell has been an absolute passenger this series so far. He needs a big one.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #75

    19 off the 15th as Good Mitch belts a couple. 142 for 3

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #76

    @MN5 said in West Indies tour of NZ:

    Bracewell has been an absolute passenger this series so far. He needs a big one.

    Tough to go off a run out.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #77

    @booboo said in West Indies tour of NZ:

    @MN5 said in West Indies tour of NZ:

    Bracewell has been an absolute passenger this series so far. He needs a big one.

    Tough to go off a run out.

    Ah well, double figures is progress and he has a chance to have a bowl too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • 1kiwi1 Offline
    1kiwi1 Offline
    1kiwi
    wrote on last edited by 1kiwi
    #78

    Black Caps falling apart here after being on target for a decent total.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    replied to 1kiwi on last edited by
    #79

    @1kiwi said in West Indies tour of NZ:

    Black Caps falling apart here after being on target for a decent total.

    Getting worserer.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #80

    We'll be 20 behind where we should be

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #81

    @booboo said in West Indies tour of NZ:

    We'll be 20 behind where we should be

    Yep, a flurry of wickets.

    Windies bowling well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #82

    Lowest total ever batting first at this ground. Not a good sign. 177-9.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #83

    The moment I remembered this was on I started watching and the BCs lost 31-6. The good news is I have to go to the tip and to Bunnings so will miss watching the Windies bat.

    We got this.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #84

    Why is Jamieson there..

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #85

    WI 75 for 6.

    Need 103 off 60

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #86

    52 from 23 needed. 2 wickets in hand. We should nab this.

    As I type Jamieson serves a nice pie for Springer to hit for four.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #87

    @Virgil said in West Indies tour of NZ:

    Why is Jamieson there..

    To keep it close?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #88

    Neesh bowling. The Windies could get 30 this over if they back themselves

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

West Indies tour of NZ
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.