England Vs All Blacks
-
@game_film said in England Vs All Blacks:
@Bovidae Leinster must be wishing they’d signed Proctor instead.
Why? He's hasn't been a star performer for the ABs this season and has less name brand recognition than Ioane.
-
The oddest feeling about seeing this team is that even when I'm not happy with a team I'm confident we're going to win. I looked at this, which isn't much different than a lot our teams this year (when I've been confident we're going to win) and I instantly thought we're gonna lose this one. Hopefully my pessimism is hugely misplaced.
Lee Germon Barrett is due a big game, hopefully this is it.
-
@Mauss Entirely on the money in my view, as well - though, I watch a lot less of non AB tests, so can't really speak authoritatively about that trend - but, from what I've seen the high ball creates chaos - and teams have got to work out how - on balance - to be beneficiaries rather than victims of the chaos.
I think the Boks have a headstart because they've probably got the strongest scrum in world rugby. It was disturbing to me to see how badly they took our scrum apart - I haven't seen anyone else manage that, but I was also surprised how well the Scots stood up last weekend.
But, back to the Boks - their scrum gives a significant advantage where any ball is knocked on. And I think it encourages their contesters to be more disruptive - as compared to our guys who still very much look like they're mainly trying to catch the ball - which looks cool when it comes off, but might be a lower percentage option. But, also I suspect we're more inclined than most to use the ball in hand in offensive areas - rather than box kick - and on defense we're often kicking for touch rather than to contest.
-
Another chance to be a broken record about out idiotic media
"The 25 year old's return sees Wallace Sititi demoted to the bench"
Sititi has NOT been demoted. Repeat, NOT demoted, he has been put on the bench because he is an absolute fucking weapon for us at the back end of the game. You know, the part of the game where matches are won and lost? If he had been DEMOTED as this absurd article suggests, we wouldn't be fucking trusting him with winning us the game at the end would we!!
Jesus H Christ when will these idiots learn that modern rugby is a 23 man game?!?
-
@No-Quarter said in England Vs All Blacks:
Another chance to be a broken record about out idiotic media
"The 25 year old's return sees Wallace Sititi demoted to the bench"
Sititi has NOT been demoted. Repeat, NOT demoted, he has been put on the bench because he is an absolute fucking weapon for us at the back end of the game. You know, the part of the game where matches are won and lost? If he had been DEMOTED as this absurd article suggests, we wouldn't be fucking trusting him with winning us the game at the end would we!!
Jesus H Christ when will these idiots learn that modern rugby is a 23 man game?!?
The week after a bench player got man of the match and essentially was the match winner.
-
@No-Quarter the media love a victim or scapegoat and using emotive language even if it is way off what is reality.
Given Sititi has been used in this role during the year, it shouldn’t be a surprise to see him again off the bench.
I guess if it goes pear shape with Parker this journo has already written his post game article….
-
@Nepia said in England Vs All Blacks:
The oddest feeling about seeing this team is that even when I'm not happy with a team I'm confident we're going to win. I looked at this, which isn't much different than a lot our teams this year (when I've been confident we're going to win) and I instantly thought we're gonna lose this one. Hopefully my pessimism is hugely misplaced.
England at Twickenham is rarely easy. I think this was always likely to be the trickiest assignment on this tour, given we played the Irish on neutral territory.
Looking at the injury ward: Clarke, (the forgotten) Narawa, JBarrett, Hotham, Tuipolotu, Vaa'i, Aumua and Lomax.
Most of these guys would have played a role in this game - plus a few others like Norris and 2TVs probably a bit less likely.
-
@No-Quarter said in England Vs All Blacks:
Another chance to be a broken record about out idiotic media
"The 25 year old's return sees Wallace Sititi demoted to the bench"
Sititi has NOT been demoted. Repeat, NOT demoted, he has been put on the bench because he is an absolute fucking weapon for us at the back end of the game. You know, the part of the game where matches are won and lost? If he had been DEMOTED as this absurd article suggests, we wouldn't be fucking trusting him with winning us the game at the end would we!!
Jesus H Christ when will these idiots learn that modern rugby is a 23 man game?!?
Yup, we’ve (Ferners) realised it, the smart teams have realised it and one of the trends of 2025 is that it is creeping into mainstream/casual fan rugby thinking. Looks like Stuff journalists are missing the trend!
FFS Borthwick is deliberately putting 4 of his better players on the bench for the last 20 mins. Players who are highly probable to be better than their starting equivalents. SAF has been playing around with the optimal bench composition for years – and they have the requisite squad buy-in to do it.
-
@MN5 said in England Vs All Blacks:
@Landers92 said in England Vs All Blacks:
@MN5 yes, still a pinch. Just passing on the reasoning.
Yeah but they have three guys who can cover 12 in Tupea, LF and Ardie. I'd prefer Ioane there to cover centre and wing with that added dynamism that ALB lacks.
Yeah for sure, I’m not defending it, just simply stating why he’s there. It makes me wonder if Big Jim was healthy, would he be on the bench in a situation like this.
-
@Landers92 said in England Vs All Blacks:
@MN5 said in England Vs All Blacks:
@Landers92 said in England Vs All Blacks:
@MN5 yes, still a pinch. Just passing on the reasoning.
Yeah but they have three guys who can cover 12 in Tupea, LF and Ardie. I'd prefer Ioane there to cover centre and wing with that added dynamism that ALB lacks.
Yeah for sure, I’m not defending it, just simply stating why he’s there. It makes me wonder if Big Jim was healthy, would he be on the bench in a situation like this.
No doubt about it with Jordie out.
@Chris-B if all fit I think what these coaches would go with
9- Cam
10- Beaudie
11- Clarke
12- Jordie
13- QT
14- Narawa
15- Jordan21- Hotham 22- LF 23- DMac
-
@pakman said in England Vs All Blacks:
@Bones said in England Vs All Blacks:
Probably the lightest front row in a decade, plus the openside will take a decade to get around the field.
Stevie B is saving the big boys for the Pom Squad.
Someone at Sky reads TSF...
-
@ACT-Crusader Pretty much spot on, I'd say!
-
Some interesting comments by McCaw. Like what he says about being ready to play and him not liking the concept of 'developing as an All Black'. Example: Holland ready to go. Parker developing.
-
@Bones said in England Vs All Blacks:
@brodean ok, but who's ready to go in our"problem" positions? How do you know until you try a player? If they don't perform from the get go, do they get dropped?
We would have cast aside quite a few players, even in McCaw's day.
Which are the problem positions?
-
@taniwharugby said in England Vs All Blacks:
@Bones that Nonu guy is a prime example of a player that took time to develop, he ended up a handy player.
To be fair, both him and Kaino were cast aside!