West Indies tour of NZ
-
@bayimports said in West Indies tour of NZ:
@MN5 said in West Indies tour of NZ:
double hundy for Conway. Super stuff.
May as well have a crack at a triple, he has time.
You don't get many opportunities in cricket and time is on his side..long way off though still,
surely cant happen
We only plan to bat once now. So might as well fill his boots
-
@canefan said in West Indies tour of NZ:
@bayimports said in West Indies tour of NZ:
@MN5 said in West Indies tour of NZ:
double hundy for Conway. Super stuff.
May as well have a crack at a triple, he has time.
You don't get many opportunities in cricket and time is on his side..long way off though still,
surely cant happen
We only plan to bat once now. So might as well fill his boots
oh i agree, i am trying to keep the cricket superstition gods in check
-
Shows how shit the bowling was yesterday, great bowling today not only restricted run rate, but now Kane gooonnnneee
-
Conway finally goes for 227, fantastic knock. There is quite a bit in this pitch I reckon, WI will struggle against our seamers.
-
NZ will want to bowl for about an hour tonight so that the bowlers can really steam in without wasting much energy, but also retaining some shine on the ball tomorrow.
You also don't want to bat on and on to only bat once - because you want to have the option to bat a couple of sessions later - just to give your bowlers a bit of time to recharge between innings.
5.5 sessions is pretty much ideal in my view - with the option to bat two more later in the game = 7.5 sessions and that's half the time in the game.
-
Well done NZ, great first innings, well set up and continued by Rachin and a nice run a ball cameo by Ajaz
-
@Donsteppa said in West Indies tour of NZ:
Buffet bowling so far.
yep, we feasted and learnt nothing from that first day
-
is it the absolute road that the box score suggests?
2 days, 8 wickets, and almost 700 runs
-
Coney and Smith have both been scathing of the NZ bowling on the radio. I've been listening rather than watching the Windies innings.
Looked like there was something there for the Windies bowlers today, so I thought those who thought our bowlers might knock them over cheaply could be right.
To be fair, we're missing about half a dozen of our best bowlers, so we might be expecting a bit much.
Henry, Jamieson, O'Rourke, Satnav, Sears, Tickner - I think all would make this team - probably Fisher, as well.
-
@mariner4life said in West Indies tour of NZ:
is it the absolute road that the box score suggests?
2 days, 8 wickets, and almost 700 runs
If you bowl in the right areas you can get results, in fact Windies bowled quite well today, but soo much average bowling deservedly getting walloped
-
Watching at the ground, I presumed they were bowling to a plan for these 2 batsmen but it seemed to involve pitching it up and they were all being dealt to. I wondered if they think King has a weakness falling over and being LBW .... if that wasn't the case then it was just bad bowling
-
@mariner4life said in West Indies tour of NZ:
is it the absolute road that the box score suggests?
2 days, 8 wickets, and almost 700 runs
It actually isn't, there has been swing and seam and plenty going past the edge. Just poor bowling from both sides, not consistent enough.
-
The decision to re select Blundell over Hay as I have said before is a poor one.
Compare the reckless shot Blundell played in his score of 4 to the 61 Hay scored when NZ was in trouble in the previous tests, shows who will contribute more.
Blundell dropped a catchable one down the leg side, and anyone who says it was hard sure, but if you get a decent glove on it you should catch it at test level, he just moved too late at 35 that is going to happen.
Hay is the best WK in NZ as he anticipates very well and gets in to catching positions very easily compared to other keepers, and stays down longer which gets him in to good positions to take the ball and keeps his head and eyes more in line with the ball.
It is always easier to catch a ball staying low and coming up than coming up too soon and having to re adjust.
