European Club Rugby
-
@MajorRage said in NH club rugby:
@Catogrande From that point of argument, your not wrong.
The sanction, for punching a bloke in the face off the ball, is the same for not jumping high enough to catch a ball.
Difference is you can get serious long term injury - especially to the neck, from being taken out in the air, not so much from a punch in the face.
All the law changes are aimed at stoping the really bad injuries - the tackle area will move down due to the increase in high front on tackles meaning head clashes keep happening, the neck roll thing came in to help rucks, the bomb issue to stop guys landing on their head from 5 feet up etc.
Its all about stopping someone eventually breaking his neck in a test. Or George North being a vegetable by 28. Go back to the 80's & early 90's guys got punched a LOT, and rucked shitless, but there were less injuries because most tackles were low, guys were smaller, jumping & catching was only done by Tim Horan, no one got lifted (and dropped) etc.
-
@mooshld said in NH club rugby:
Aki not declaring for Ireland reeks of a negotiation tactic. To squeeze the last few euros out of them that he can.
Nothing more he won't come back to NZ where he has no guarantee of anything and won't play for peanuts for Samoa.
Just his agent earning his paycheck if you ask me.
Not at all. He's signed a new contract - there isn't anything to squeeze. Player payments for test matches are fixed team amounts, there is no difference in these either. He could declare for Samoa and there would be nothing to stop him contractually.
-
@Wurzel said in NH club rugby:
If he declared for Samoa and played for them this June that may mess with the Irish Qualified Quota in the Connacht squad and see him asked to leave as Ruan Pienaar was at Ulster. So he could force the IRFU's hand to get himself removed from a team he no longer wants to play for.
And with a juicy Top 14 contract dangled in front of him then a couple of Tests for the Manu this year could be just the ticket out of Galway.
Connacht does not have quotas. The Player Succession Strategy applies to Leinster, Munster and Ulster only. The new policy is to find and develop Irish qualified players. All provincial coaches have now said this in media in the last couple of months.
What it might do is if he became a NIQ player then his contract could not be renewed in 2020 in line with current foreign player contract policy. If he doesn't want to play for Connacht any more, then he's got a problem on his hands but the IRFU couldn't afford to leave him sitting there or have a Goosen situation on their hands. They could just insist a Top14/English team to buy him out of his contract. -
The other obvious thing he will have to weigh up is how long he thinks an international career for Ireland would last. If he feels that he may be a stopgap player and would rather play for Manu Samoa and probably go to a RWC then he may take that route rather than become the guy that plays a couple of games and goes the rest of his career without international play.
You would think this scenario would have to be tied up with a good T14 contract though as playing for MS doesn't exactly pay the bills. -
@MajorRage said in NH club rugby:
The sanction, for punching a bloke in the face off the ball, is the same for not jumping high enough to catch a ball.
No it's not. Pisi got sanctioned for recklessly creating the scenario where the guy actually going for the ball ended up in a very dangerous position. It's got nothing at all to do with how high he jumped. That's like saying a guy getting a red for a shoulder charge got carded for attempting a tackle, it's not his fault the tacklee didn't make himself hit the guys arms first is it?
-
In other (unconfirmed) news: according to L'Equipe, Clermont considers signing Stephen Brett as injury replacement player for injured first-five Patricio Fernandez (out for 10 weeks), and possibly also to replace Camille Lopez if the latter is named in the French team for the 6 Nations. Brett now plays for Narbonne in the Pro D2 competition.
-
@Bones said in NH club rugby:
@MajorRage said in NH club rugby:
The sanction, for punching a bloke in the face off the ball, is the same for not jumping high enough to catch a ball.
No it's not. Pisi got sanctioned for recklessly creating the scenario where the guy actually going for the ball ended up in a very dangerous position. It's got nothing at all to do with how high he jumped. That's like saying a guy getting a red for a shoulder charge got carded for attempting a tackle, it's not his fault the tacklee didn't make himself hit the guys arms first is it?
Sorry Bones I think you have gone all Winger on us on this one. I get your pov but you seem fixated on dispelling any concept that, however poorly, Pisi was actually trying to catch the ball while totally ignoring that the 'victim' (under current ruling) is entitled to place himself in a position of high risk knowing that another player was likely to enter the same area.
-
@Crucial said in NH club rugby:
@Bones said in NH club rugby:
@MajorRage said in NH club rugby:
The sanction, for punching a bloke in the face off the ball, is the same for not jumping high enough to catch a ball.
No it's not. Pisi got sanctioned for recklessly creating the scenario where the guy actually going for the ball ended up in a very dangerous position. It's got nothing at all to do with how high he jumped. That's like saying a guy getting a red for a shoulder charge got carded for attempting a tackle, it's not his fault the tacklee didn't make himself hit the guys arms first is it?
Sorry Bones I think you have gone all Winger on us on this one. I get your pov but you seem fixated on dispelling any concept that, however poorly, Pisi was actually trying to catch the ball while totally ignoring that the 'victim' (under current ruling) is entitled to place himself in a position of high risk knowing that another player was likely to enter the same area.
Well no, the 'victim' was trying to collect the ball fair and square. Just like in the other scenario I posed where the'victim' was trying to run the ball. The guy doing the shoulder charge wasn't at fault right? How could he be, it's just the 'victim' didn't run into contact correctly.
-
Running the ball is a standard part of the game and the many risks are understood and mitigated (although the current mitigations on head contact are yet to be proved effective). Although the professional game has brought in bigger players and harder impacts you can train to take those impacts.
Jumping for the ball and placing your centre of gravity above everyone else is high risk. You may not be at fault for an accident or breaking any laws but you have made a decision to increase the risk of injury to yourself.
What WR have failed to do effectively is decide how to mitigate this high risk yet legal activity. The proof is in the number of players without intent falling foul of the law when they are simply playing the game.
If you want to believe that Pisi intentionally decided to risk breaking someones neck then I won't change your mind. I just don't think that is the case. -
@Crucial said in NH club rugby:
If you want to believe that Pisi intentionally decided to risk breaking someones neck then I won't change your mind. I just don't think that is the case.
I don't for a second think he intentionally tried to hurt him. I think he did know he had lost the jump & took the collision to stop the oppo player galloping off down field with the ball, rather than doing everything he could to avoid the collision.
Under the new laws the emphasis is on the "losing" player to do all he can not to be in Pisi's position. And I'd argue he could have done a LOT more, but it would have handed a huge advantage to the jumper. So he didn't.
It's the same way you will often see a high shot on a player going in in the corner. The tackler has 2 options, high shot or try, so he goes high shot & pleads "it slipped up". Under the new laws thats an instant binning (at best).
-
If you have to sprint to get to the contest zone then you aren't going to be able to effectively contest against an opponent who has has had time to slow down, and maximised their vertical jump.
Coaches are going to have to stress to their players that if they are in Pisi's position, then they need to be holding off for a split second, to tackle the jumper as they hit the deck. (Done correctly this is still a good turnover opportunity).
Spear tackles are red cards, and the consequences of these incidents really are at a similar level.
-
-
@Frye said in NH club rugby:
If you have to sprint to get to the contest zone then you aren't going to be able to effectively contest against an opponent who has has had time to slow down, and maximised their vertical jump.
Coaches are going to have to stress to their players that if they are in Pisi's position, then they need to be holding off for a split second, to tackle the jumper as they hit the deck. (Done correctly this is still a good turnover opportunity).
Spear tackles are red cards, and the consequences of these incidents really are at a similar level.
The 'victim' was sprinting to the contest zone and had to jump from some distance out to get above Pisi. It's not like he was under the ball and did a straight up vertical jump and Pisi came through and took him out.
As for this whole victim was trying to get the ball fair and square stuff, so too was Pisi, he just didn't jump high enough and at the last moment ducked his head from the impact.
@B
-
@Nepia said in NH club rugby:
@Frye said in NH club rugby:
If you have to sprint to get to the contest zone then you aren't going to be able to effectively contest against an opponent who has has had time to slow down, and maximised their vertical jump.
Coaches are going to have to stress to their players that if they are in Pisi's position, then they need to be holding off for a split second, to tackle the jumper as they hit the deck. (Done correctly this is still a good turnover opportunity).
Spear tackles are red cards, and the consequences of these incidents really are at a similar level.
The 'victim' was sprinting to the contest zone and had to jump from some distance out to get above Pisi. It's not like he was under the ball and did a straight up vertical jump and Pisi came through and took him out.
As for this whole victim was trying to get the ball fair and square stuff, so too was Pisi, he just didn't jump high enough and at the last moment ducked his head from the impact.
@B
@Nepia fuck off with this Pisi was trying too shit. Bollocks. He made the most pathetic jump which is merely just a show to try and pass off he's going for the ball. If Pisi can only jump 2 inches off the ground he's no right to be a professional rugby player.
I'd have to think you're new to rugby or retarded to be convinced you're not being obtuse or just whining for the sake of it. He was in no place to win that competition and it's rather obvious. He's not some awful breed of human who once he spots a rugby ball he can't move his eyes/head or use his peripheral vision to see anything other than a small oval in his vision. He even turns to brace for impact, which oddly some are citing as a reason he's not at fault.
If he arrives earlier and makes an actual attempt to compete, fairly, then fucken eh go for it. But that was awful. He was late, hardly even got off the ground if he even did and made no attempt to remove any danger apart from to himself.
-
@Bones I'm actually finding you to be obtuse here and am unsure how you've come to a conclusion Pisi wasn't actually going for the ball. It's seems like you've decided that only the guy who jumps the highest can be going for the ball which is just plain bollocks.
-
This is beyond a joke. The first YC is the one Charles tweeted about (my previous post)
-
@antipodean Incredible. The ref even said "This is not accidental". Then what is ever accidental?
-
Absurd that such a tackle is illegal. I think someone mentioned Keven Mealamu in another thread; the likes of Kev or a Hika Elliott will be unstoppable from 5 metres out if those type of try-saving tackles are no longer attempted for fear of yellow card and penalty try.
-
Haha rugby is dead. Roll on the AFL season
-
I would actually like someone from World Rugby to come out and tell us how that #8 is supposed to make rhat tackle on s player a foot shorter than him who is diving for the line, and stay within the laws
