• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps vs Bangles

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
671 Posts 39 Posters 92.2k Views
Black Caps vs Bangles
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Unco on last edited by
    #278

    @Unco i saw that. it came across so smug as well, which was delicious

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #279

    Sounds like a decent breeze in Wellington, they've had to take some of the camera's down. Must be nearly impossible to bowl in - we'd be better off with no more play today and come back tomorrow to start again. My memories of bowling into a Southerly at Ian Galloway park are not overly favorable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gollumG Offline
    gollumG Offline
    gollum
    wrote on last edited by
    #280

    http://www.espncricinfo.com/india-v-england-2016-17/engine/match/1075473.html

    Opening for India A today - Sheldon Jackson

    That has to be the least Indian Indian ever to play. It makes Graham Labroy sound liuke Muttiahaiah Muralithian

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    replied to gollum on last edited by
    #281

    @gollum said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    http://www.espncricinfo.com/india-v-england-2016-17/engine/match/1075473.html

    Opening for India A today - Sheldon Jackson

    That has to be the least Indian Indian ever to play. It makes Graham Labroy sound liuke Muttiahaiah Muralithian

    That's Gra-ee-mee to you.

    (And Labrooy in actual fact ... 2 o's ... although we know you're surname-spelling-fluid ... 🙂 )

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #282

    Jesus @MN5 for cannon fodder they're doing alright.

    I know Wagner is our highest ranked test bowler, but has Macca been giving him lessons?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #283

    @mariner4life said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    Jesus @MN5 for cannon fodder they're doing alright.

    I know Wagner is our highest ranked test bowler, but has Macca been giving him lessons?

    Surprisingly so. Still waiting a good old fashioned collapse though.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #284

    @MN5 yea. you mean when we bat right?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #285

    @mariner4life said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @MN5 yea. you mean when we bat right?

    At home vs the Bangles? To paraphrase Moff Tarkin I think you overestimate their chances....

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #286

    @MN5 It's like you've never seen us play before

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #287

    What's wrong with these guys, why can't they get these Muppets out?

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #288

    @Gunner benign pitch, slow bowlers, no decent spinner. If it doesn't swing about, our attack becomes very pedestrian very quickly.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #289

    A lot of their batsmen have decent records.Their bowling attack is pretty weak though.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #290

    @hydro11 said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    A lot of their batsmen have decent records.Their bowling attack is pretty weak though.

    Yeah, they don't bat deep but they've got some handy players in their top 6 with good records. I'm not watching but the pitch appears pretty benign, similar to our test there vs Aus last year. Pretty disappointing as the Basin has historically served up some pretty quick pitches with a bit in it for the swing bowlers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #291

    wait on a sec, the two blokes currently carving us up have away averages of 38 and 34. If they were NZ players we would be questioning their place in the side, but here they are in a 185 unbeaten partnership scoring at basically 4 an over.

    Iqbal seems to be the only one who averages more than 40 away.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #292

    Two guys averaging 38 and 34.

    That would be like a McMillam/Oram partnership.

    Edit. Whoops missed the away clause. So guys better than these 2 then ......

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by No Quarter
    #293

    Gezz I don't think I even want to look at the NZ batsmen's away averages. Kane and maybe Rosco would be OK. Overall the Bangles have two blokes averaging 40 and one averaging 50. They're obviously not world beaters but they're not Zimbabwe like minnows either.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #294

    @mariner4life said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @Gunner benign pitch, slow bowlers, no decent spinner. If it doesn't swing about, our attack becomes very pedestrian very quickly.

    Hang on.

    Aren't you the guy who talked Santner up to ridiculous levels?

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by No Quarter
    #295

    Tamim Iqbal - 40 (= Latham)
    Imrul Kayes - 28 (= Guppy, early days for Raval)
    Mominul Haque - 51 (= Kane)
    Mahmudullah - 31 (< Rosco)
    Shakib Al Hasan - 39 (> Nicholls)
    Mushfiqur Rahim - 31 (> CDGH, though BJ has a better record)

    Batting wise they're pretty even with us. It's the bowling that separates the teams in tests. On a relatively benign pitch we aren't that superior despite what @MN5 will tell you.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #296

    @No-Quarter said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    Tamim Iqbal - 40 (= Latham)
    Imrul Kayes - 28 (= Guppy, early days for Raval)
    Mominul Haque - 51 (= Kane)
    Mahmudullah - 31 (< Rosco)
    Shakib Al Hasan - 39 (> Nicholls)
    Mushfiqur Rahim - 31 (> CDGH, though BJ has a better record)

    Batting wise they're pretty even with us. It's the bowling that separates the teams in tests. On a relatively benign pitch we aren't that superior despite what @MN5 will tell you.

    I've been 100% right so far. I see no difference this time round. The weather yesterday didn't help.

    #clutchingatstraws

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #297

    Don't get me wrong, this is bloody disappointing. I did expect to have them bowled out by now, but on a flat track they aren't completely useless in the tests. Don't have enough power hitters for the shorter forms though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Black Caps vs Bangles
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.