• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps vs Bangles

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
671 Posts 39 Posters 92.2k Views
Black Caps vs Bangles
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by Gunner
    #471

    CdG seems to be proving that his 6 for on debut was a fluke.

    Time for some spin to stem the bleeding me thinks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #472

    The Bangles looking good to post s competitive total here, do we still double their score at 30 overs?
    What's a good ODI score to post on this ground

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #473

    @Virgil with wickets in hand I think you double the score after 35 overs these days.

    Not looking forward to the batting powerplay!

    V 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #474

    I was just looking at CdG's record. It's obviously skewed by the 6-for, but, this innings aside, while he doesn't take wickets, he seems to be able to hold down an end, that's handy enough for the 4th seamer.

    What he needs to do is start scoring runs. There isn't a place in the side for am economical 4th seamer who isn't also averaging 35+ with the bat.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #475

    @Gunner said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @Virgil with wickets in hand I think you double the score after 35 overs these days.

    Not looking forward to the batting powerplay!

    They just need to keep wickets in hand so they can launch at the last 10 overs or so

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #476

    @mariner4life CdG went for three 4s in his first over and has leaked runs in his 6 overs to date.

    I did see he was listed to bat behind Santner too in the Sky team list.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #477

    @Bovidae yea, that's why i said "this innings aside". If he's going to leak runs, and not score, then he's useless.

    Cricinfo has him at 6.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    tubbyj
    wrote on last edited by
    #478

    Well that was shithouse. No one here really commenting on the poor captaining from Williamson. Couple of catches through vacant 3rd slip on the first morning. Choosing to bat on a wicket Craig Cumming said in his pitch report would play reasonably well.

    Jeet Raval better score some runs in this test after that slip catch fiasco off Shakib.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    tubbyj
    wrote on last edited by
    #479

    In saying that Bangladesh do deserve alot of praise for their batting first up in both test matches. Their batting lineup seems to be pretty strong with the younger players coming through looking especially good for their future prospects.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #480

    @mariner4life said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    Following on from the "best batsmen" bit below, did you see the India v England ODI last night? Run fest.

    India scored 381 on the back of a couple of old-timers. Good old Yuvraj Singh whacked 150 off 127, and reliable old MS Dhoni 134 off 122, a 256-run partnership off 229 balls. In replay England made it to 366, with Eion Morgan scoring a hundred.

    India were 25/3 as well. England may have thought the job was done with Kohli out early...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #481

    Cricinfo summary at lunch seems a little sympathetic to us, maybe they are bowling better than the text commentary shows.

    They are saying the deck is flat though, why are we bowling?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #482

    Habit - 22 tests in a row in NZ that the team winning the toss has bowled first. The results of those previous tests are equally split amongst wins, draws and losses.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #483

    CDGs 6 fer on debut reminds me of Southees 77 not out. Ridiculously good efforts that neither will ever emulate again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #484

    Am I following the 2nd test on cricinfo or are they just replaying the 1st test again?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorPomM Offline
    MajorPomM Offline
    MajorPom
    wrote on last edited by
    #485

    Nup ... 3 quick wix.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #486

    Yup good to see the bowlers rewarded after bowling so well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #487

    Fuck me days. 5 hours between posts. Poor from everyone concerned. Internet outages, too busy or does no one care about this tour anymore?

    Good old Timmy getting a Michelle ( just his sixth ever which surprised me ), sounds like there was some poor fielding all round and driving back home I listened to talkback and a few SJWs are having a whinge about some short pitched stuff to tailenders.

    Fuck RIGHT off with that you fluffybunnies. That's cricket. In saying that the game is a bit unfair in that every now and again a terrible batsman ( usually number 11 ) HAS to bat where as a shit bowler never had to embarass himself.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #488

    I'll have a whinge about short pitch bowling to tail enders.

    Why did we waste so much time bowling bouncers at tail enders when we should have been bowling at the top of off? They're tail enders for a reason and with Boult and Southee both getting movement I think we'd have been batting for an hour today.

    KruseK MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #489

    @Cyclops Well, we smashed one of their fast bowlers in the elbow, so there's that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by MN5
    #490

    @Cyclops said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    I'll have a whinge about short pitch bowling to tail enders.

    Why did we waste so much time bowling bouncers at tail enders when we should have been bowling at the top of off? They're tail enders for a reason and with Boult and Southee both getting movement I think we'd have been batting for an hour today.

    To be fair a few folk were whinging about that on talkback too. KWs captaincy was under fire from these people all of whom were absolute cricketing experts with far more nous than the Black Caps captain. Personally I say rolling a reasonably good team for under 300 is a fine effort but what would I know?

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Black Caps vs Bangles
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.