• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps vs Bangles

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
671 Posts 39 Posters 92.2k Views
Black Caps vs Bangles
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #483

    CDGs 6 fer on debut reminds me of Southees 77 not out. Ridiculously good efforts that neither will ever emulate again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #484

    Am I following the 2nd test on cricinfo or are they just replaying the 1st test again?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorPomM Offline
    MajorPomM Offline
    MajorPom
    wrote on last edited by
    #485

    Nup ... 3 quick wix.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #486

    Yup good to see the bowlers rewarded after bowling so well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #487

    Fuck me days. 5 hours between posts. Poor from everyone concerned. Internet outages, too busy or does no one care about this tour anymore?

    Good old Timmy getting a Michelle ( just his sixth ever which surprised me ), sounds like there was some poor fielding all round and driving back home I listened to talkback and a few SJWs are having a whinge about some short pitched stuff to tailenders.

    Fuck RIGHT off with that you fluffybunnies. That's cricket. In saying that the game is a bit unfair in that every now and again a terrible batsman ( usually number 11 ) HAS to bat where as a shit bowler never had to embarass himself.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #488

    I'll have a whinge about short pitch bowling to tail enders.

    Why did we waste so much time bowling bouncers at tail enders when we should have been bowling at the top of off? They're tail enders for a reason and with Boult and Southee both getting movement I think we'd have been batting for an hour today.

    KruseK MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #489

    @Cyclops Well, we smashed one of their fast bowlers in the elbow, so there's that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by MN5
    #490

    @Cyclops said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    I'll have a whinge about short pitch bowling to tail enders.

    Why did we waste so much time bowling bouncers at tail enders when we should have been bowling at the top of off? They're tail enders for a reason and with Boult and Southee both getting movement I think we'd have been batting for an hour today.

    To be fair a few folk were whinging about that on talkback too. KWs captaincy was under fire from these people all of whom were absolute cricketing experts with far more nous than the Black Caps captain. Personally I say rolling a reasonably good team for under 300 is a fine effort but what would I know?

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #491

    @MN5 wait, They're a reasonably good team now? Try to keep your narrative straight mate

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #492

    @mariner4life said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @MN5 wait, They're a reasonably good team now? Try to keep your narrative straight mate

    I never said they weren't.

    Aw, actually I did.

    Anyway, this test is in the bag no sweat

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #493

    Raval goes and Little Kane follows him two balls later.

    The bits I've watched of this test, it looks more demanding to be batting today compared with yesterday - if the Bangles were better fieldsmen we might be in deep schtumm by now - though our own fielding hasn't been up to much in this series - missing Guptill in that regard?

    Bowling - we need to get Bondy back as coach. The Bangles look to have faster and possibly more penetrative bowlers. The leg side strangle and having Wagner stick it up them seem to be two of our main ploys.

    Have to say in regard to the short pitched stuff that I've been surprised on occasions how much Wagner has been allowed to get away with in regard to short stuff - not necessarily in this test, which I've seen not much of. I don't mind a few bouncers but I've seen plenty of overs from him where I'd say he's bowled more than the allowable two in an over. The only NZ bowler I can recall bowling more would be Craig McMillan, for whom the bouncer seemed to be the stock ball.

    Will be an interesting test for our lower middle order if we lose another wicket in the near future. For me, the Nicholls/CdGH axis is the weakest part of our line-up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #494

    If the Bangles don't get a wicket soon this will get away from them.

    Taylor and Latham looking very comfortable.

    DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #495

    6000 test runs up for Taylor at a tick over 47.

    Fuck that's a good career son.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #496

    @Damo said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    If the Bangles don't get a wicket soon this will get away from them.

    Taylor and Latham looking very comfortable.

    I'm quite proud of my effort here.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    wrote on last edited by
    #497

    And Taylor now gone for 77..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    wrote on last edited by
    #498

    Santner is in at 6.. what is this..

    DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to mimic on last edited by
    #499

    @mimic Didn't bowl so has to do something I suppose.

    CDG must be on thin ice if he is below Santner in the order. May be behind Watling as well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    wrote on last edited by
    #500

    nicholls is struggling out there..

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to mimic on last edited by
    #501

    @mimic said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    nicholls is struggling out there..

    Business as usual unfortunately. He gets a charmed run. There's a #5 spot waiting for Guppy when he's fit again...

    DamoD DonsteppaD 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #502

    No tracking available is a bit amateurish, but looked out to me.

    At worst it would have been umpires call I reckon.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Black Caps vs Bangles
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.