• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps vs Bangles

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
671 Posts 39 Posters 92.2k Views
Black Caps vs Bangles
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #505

    Not convinced by Raval. Going no better than Guppy and gets a few lives on top of that. Needs to start delivering.

    BJ in before CDG. CDG not a good enough bowler to be batting 8.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #506

    @Donsteppa said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @mimic said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    nicholls is struggling out there..

    Business as usual unfortunately. He gets a charmed run. There's a #5 spot waiting for Guppy when he's fit again...

    That said, at 54 off 82 he does have a chance of kicking on for a first test ton.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #507

    So de Grandhomme's 6-for on debut has indeed bought him a season in the side regardless of however shithouse he is. Can Neesham/Anderson last a full test match again yet?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #508

    Oh dear.

    I didn't see this coming. Time for Southee to bat responsibly? Or should he just have a lash like usual.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #509

    @booboo said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    BJ in before CDG. CDG not a good enough bowler to be batting 8.

    Not a lot to suggest he's a good enough batsman to be batting at six, so I'm not completely surprised to see this this shift.

    He's been done like a dinner here by Shakib - you've got to think that a recall for Jimmy Neesham is on the cards. Seems like a much better bet as a test batsman than CdGH - maybe not quite as good as a bowler - certainly doesn't have a bag to match that one Colin got against Pakistan.

    CyclopsC boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #510

    @Chris-B.
    I don't see anything from de Grandhomme's bowling that makes me think he's up to test standard. I'm almost tempted to say we should bring in the next best batsman and manage with 4 bowlers.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #511

    @Cyclops said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @Chris-B.
    I don't see anything from de Grandhomme's bowling that makes me think he's up to test standard.

    Nor me, really - except that he got 6/41 against Pakistan. I'm inclined to think it was a fluke, but it's a bit hard to drop him three tests later - especially when he's garnered a few useful runs as well.

    He seemed an odd pick to me, when they picked him for tests in the first place.

    Meanwhile - the squad for the return Chappell-Hadlee has been named.

    I'd be inclined to start with:

    Guppy, Latham (wktkpr), Williamson, Taylor, Broom, Neesham, de Grandhomme, Santner, Southee, Ferguson, Boult.

    With Henry, Munro and Blundell on the sideline.

    Plenty of batting and bowling options in that - as well as some firepower in each - even if not particularly reliable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #512

    @Chris-B. said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @booboo said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    BJ in before CDG. CDG not a good enough bowler to be batting 8.

    Not a lot to suggest he's a good enough batsman to be batting at six...

    Essentially my point. Don't get what he brings to the team.

    A slow medium trundler who bats at 8.

    Neesh or Herb he is not.

    I'd prefer a genuine one or t'other rather than a neither.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #513

    It's absolutely bucketing down here in Christchurch, so unlikely to be much play today.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #514

    A few trolls on FB suggesting Rossco only gets runs against 'minnows'. There's five nation's above us in test cricket rankings and I definitely recall hundreds against most of them ( yet to get one vs S.A. I think )

    Not only that his 290 away against Australia was 'ages ago'....right.

    Inflated modern averages aside he's still two runs clear of Martin Crowe, he really has had a terrific career, how he wasn't an unanimous selection in an all time NZ test XI by Stuff 'experts' ( one picked Nathan Astle ) is completely beyond me.

    V H 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    wrote on last edited by
    #515

    I think I saw a stat that Luteru hasn't scored a ton against the bangas as well..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #516

    @booboo said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @Chris-B. said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @booboo said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    BJ in before CDG. CDG not a good enough bowler to be batting 8.

    Not a lot to suggest he's a good enough batsman to be batting at six...

    Essentially my point. Don't get what he brings to the team.

    A slow medium trundler who bats at 8.

    Neesh or Herb he is not.

    I'd prefer a genuine one or t'other rather than a neither.

    West Indies had one of them as captain until recently!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #517

    @MN5 said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    A few trolls on FB suggesting Rossco only gets runs against 'minnows'. There's five nation's above us in test cricket rankings and I definitely recall hundreds against most of them ( yet to get one vs S.A. I think )

    Not only that his 290 away against Australia was 'ages ago'....right.

    Inflated modern averages aside he's still two runs clear of Martin Crowe, he really has had a terrific career, how he wasn't an unanimous selection in an all time NZ test XI by Stuff 'experts' ( one picked Nathan Astle ) is completely beyond me.

    Yup saw that troll, what a fuckwit

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #518

    @Virgil said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @MN5 said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    A few trolls on FB suggesting Rossco only gets runs against 'minnows'. There's five nation's above us in test cricket rankings and I definitely recall hundreds against most of them ( yet to get one vs S.A. I think )

    Not only that his 290 away against Australia was 'ages ago'....right.

    Inflated modern averages aside he's still two runs clear of Martin Crowe, he really has had a terrific career, how he wasn't an unanimous selection in an all time NZ test XI by Stuff 'experts' ( one picked Nathan Astle ) is completely beyond me.

    Yup saw that troll, what a fuckwit

    He may as well try and convince AB fans that Richie McCaw wasn't that good. What a moron.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #519

    @MN5 said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    A few trolls on FB suggesting Rossco only gets runs against 'minnows'. There's five nation's above us in test cricket rankings and I definitely recall hundreds against most of them ( yet to get one vs S.A. I think )

    Not only that his 290 away against Australia was 'ages ago'....right.

    Inflated modern averages aside he's still two runs clear of Martin Crowe, he really has had a terrific career, how he wasn't an unanimous selection in an all time NZ test XI by Stuff 'experts' ( one picked Nathan Astle ) is completely beyond me.

    http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/38699.html?class=1;template=results;type=batting

    His record holds up okay when you break it down. Only criticism I would make is that he doesn't score a lot of runs away. His away stats get a big boost by big runs in Zimbabwe. His record against South Africa is poor but he does well enough against everyone else. I think Ross Taylor would basically play for every international team in the world.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by MN5
    #520

    @hydro11 said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @MN5 said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    A few trolls on FB suggesting Rossco only gets runs against 'minnows'. There's five nation's above us in test cricket rankings and I definitely recall hundreds against most of them ( yet to get one vs S.A. I think )

    Not only that his 290 away against Australia was 'ages ago'....right.

    Inflated modern averages aside he's still two runs clear of Martin Crowe, he really has had a terrific career, how he wasn't an unanimous selection in an all time NZ test XI by Stuff 'experts' ( one picked Nathan Astle ) is completely beyond me.

    http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/38699.html?class=1;template=results;type=batting

    His record holds up okay when you break it down. Only criticism I would make is that he doesn't score a lot of runs away. His away stats get a big boost by big runs in Zimbabwe. His record against South Africa is poor but he does well enough against everyone else. I think Ross Taylor would basically play for every international team in the world.

    Well you can use selective stats to back up any argument if you delve enough into them and even the very best fall short against certain opposition here and there.

    As you say I can't think of a side playing that wouldn't pick him at 4 or 5 in a lineup. That's not to say he'd make a 'World XI' ( Warner, Amla, Cook, Root, KW, Smith, Kohli, ABDV would all get in ahead of him ) but I think he'd slot into any team going around today. High praise indeed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #521

    How's the weather today? Pissing down in the nation's capital so hoping for better news from there.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    wrote on last edited by JK
    #522

    On track to start 1030am today
    edit - they just updated saying fine but groundstaff got some work to do so 11am

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #523

    Would be great if Nicholls could go on to score a ton, however watching the highlights didn't fill me with confidence that he has ironed out his technical deficiencies. He still regularly pushes at balls outside off with hard hands, getting edges to and through the slip cordon. A better team would have him out already I'd say. Not sold that he is our long term answer at 5. Have to say I'm very surprised Guppy wasn't given the number 5 slot after Raval was called up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    wrote on last edited by
    #524

    And we have the lead..
    A Nicholls ton will buy him another season in the black caps..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Black Caps vs Bangles
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.