Super Rugby News
-
@Kiap yes but those shitholes have good rugby teams
Outside of Auckland of course
@mariner4life Even the Aucks have a passable team ;–)
But that's not the criterion, is it?
If you purely chopped the weakest rugby teams, the Sunwolves, Kings, Rebels, et al., would all be out before the Ponies - not that the Brumbies are actually going.
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Super Rugby News:
But that doesn't take away that Canberra is a miniscule market with pretty zero scope for growth.
Oh yeah, Canberra is also a stupid, pointless, freezing, soulless arsehole of a town. In my humble opinion of course
Sounds like most of NZ, to be fair. Outside of Auckland, of course.
A transplanted Canberra-Queanbeyan would be the biggest city in NZ.
Outside of Auckland, of course.
@Kiap said in Super Rugby News:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Super Rugby News:
But that doesn't take away that Canberra is a miniscule market with pretty zero scope for growth.
Oh yeah, Canberra is also a stupid, pointless, freezing, soulless arsehole of a town. In my humble opinion of course
Sounds like most of NZ, to be fair. Outside of Auckland, of course.
A transplanted Canberra-Queanbeyan would be the biggest city in NZ.
Outside of Auckland, of course.
That's not the issue. The issue is that an Aus team has to be cut and a decision has to be made about which one should get the arse. NZ has nothing to do with it.
-
@Kiap said in Super Rugby News:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Super Rugby News:
But that doesn't take away that Canberra is a miniscule market with pretty zero scope for growth.
Oh yeah, Canberra is also a stupid, pointless, freezing, soulless arsehole of a town. In my humble opinion of course
Sounds like most of NZ, to be fair. Outside of Auckland, of course.
A transplanted Canberra-Queanbeyan would be the biggest city in NZ.
Outside of Auckland, of course.
That's not the issue. The issue is that an Aus team has to be cut and a decision has to be made about which one should get the arse. NZ has nothing to do with it.
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Super Rugby News:
That's not the issue. The issue is that an Aus team has to be cut and a decision has to be made about which one should get the arse. NZ has nothing to do with it.
I'm just rebuffung your humble opinions.
But, yes, it's an ARU issue even though they are trying to "hide behind SANZAAR" at the moment. It might all end up being too hard for the ARU, though.
Super Rugby as we know it is dead anyway. All that's happening now are attempts to salvage something ... anything ... get to the end of the present broadcast deal.
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Super Rugby News:
That's not the issue. The issue is that an Aus team has to be cut and a decision has to be made about which one should get the arse. NZ has nothing to do with it.
I'm just rebuffung your humble opinions.
But, yes, it's an ARU issue even though they are trying to "hide behind SANZAAR" at the moment. It might all end up being too hard for the ARU, though.
Super Rugby as we know it is dead anyway. All that's happening now are attempts to salvage something ... anything ... get to the end of the present broadcast deal.
@Kiap said in Super Rugby News:
Super Rugby as we know it is dead anyway.
I'm starting to think they should go back to the future and implement a Champions Cup style arrangement from the best of the NPC/ Currie Cup/ NRC.
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Super Rugby News:
That's not the issue. The issue is that an Aus team has to be cut and a decision has to be made about which one should get the arse. NZ has nothing to do with it.
I'm just rebuffung your humble opinions.
But, yes, it's an ARU issue even though they are trying to "hide behind SANZAAR" at the moment. It might all end up being too hard for the ARU, though.
Super Rugby as we know it is dead anyway. All that's happening now are attempts to salvage something ... anything ... get to the end of the present broadcast deal.
@Kiap said in Super Rugby News:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in Super Rugby News:
That's not the issue. The issue is that an Aus team has to be cut and a decision has to be made about which one should get the arse. NZ has nothing to do with it.
I'm just rebuffung your humble opinions.
But, yes, it's an ARU issue even though they are trying to "hide behind SANZAAR" at the moment. It might all end up being too hard for the ARU, though.
Super Rugby as we know it is dead anyway. All that's happening now are attempts to salvage something ... anything ... get to the end of the present broadcast deal.
Fair enough. Did I mention I'm not a fan of the place.
I don't know what's going to happen. What do South Africans honestly think of the whole thing?
-
-
Jonathan Faauli (Chiefs) has been cited for an alleged dangerous tackle.
-
Similar in height of tackle but it wasn't late, and it was on a player who handled the ball. Luatua just smoked TNW with a high shot off the ball.
-
@Stargazer Luatua level, so should be more than 4 weeks suspension.
@Tim said in Super Rugby News:
@Stargazer Luatua level, so should be more than 4 weeks suspension.
I haven't seen the official text of the citing, so not sure about what the entry-level will be. If it's Luatua level offending - as you say - then it will be a mid-entry point of 6 weeks. If he shows early remorse, combined with his clean record (the same reasons used for deducting two weeks in Luatua's case), then it would be 4 weeks. Just like Luatua. There may, however, in Faauli's case be different/more reasons for deduction (like his relative inexperience - 4 SR caps). We'll know tomorrow.
-
Sonny Bill Williams return from injury on the horizon
Sonny Bill Williams is set to return to Super Rugby in the coming weeks as he nears a full recovery from the achilles injury he suffered at the Olympics in August last year.
Speaking to Veitchy on Sport, Blues coach Tana Umaga suggested the 33-test All Black could take to the field as early as this weekend, when the Blues face off against the Highlanders at Forsyth Barr Stadium in Dunedin.
Sam Cane and Nepo Laulala left the field with concussion in the Chiefs 28-12 win over the Bulls in Hamilton.
Both players are in doubt to travel to South Africa with their teammates after they both failed concussion tests last night, with Laulala not returning to the field after halftime, while Cane lasted just three minutes before being replaced.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby/news/article.cfm?c_id=80&objectid=11830360
-
Chiefs Super Rugby centre Jonathan Fa'auli has been slapped with a 4 week suspension for a dangerous tackle in his team’s victory over the Bulls.
http://www.superxv.com/chiefs-centre-faauli-suspended-4-weeks/
-
Robertson was optimistic about an ankle injury to centre Ryan Crotty, with the All Blacks centre expected to only miss two or three weeks.I wonder whether that includes the bye week or not.
http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2017/04/03/01/52/waratahs-crusaders-scott-robertson-reaction
-
