Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz
-
-
-
-
never understood why you would willingly choose a mystery weekend...have colleagues that won one, and they were asked of 2 places they didnt want to go and may have even been asked for a couple of preferred destinations as well.
-
Who pays that much without choosing where they are going? Sounds like they only really wanted to go somewhere special so why not make sure you do. Numpties.
AirNZ need to make sure they don't rip people off though. I would also think that is nowhere near value for money.
And Invers isn't that bad. Have an explore out to Riverton for a great feed of Blue cod. Or drive out to the Caitlins, or ......ummmm.... -
tbf the concept is OK but it really does need to make sure that the punters get good return on their spend.
I'm fairly certain that most punters think they might be being send to a destination that accommodates visitors well and has lots for them to choose from. Places like Napier, Rotorua, Bay of Islands, Nelson, Queenstown.
Not Hamilton, Invers, PN... -
-
@MN5 said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
Your heart just goes out to those people living under oppression. Don't read this if you get butthurt easily.
I side with her actually. It's lowest common denominator stuff when the average law abiding person has to change their behaviour due to a 'blanket rule' to curb bad behaviour from scrotes.
This was the key quote in that article.
"Green said the rule had to be applied across the board, in order for no one group to complain about discrimination."What weak bullshit. How about 'we decide whether our security is at risk from a hidden face'
-
@Crucial said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@MN5 said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
Your heart just goes out to those people living under oppression. Don't read this if you get butthurt easily.
I side with her actually. It's lowest common denominator stuff when the average law abiding person has to change their behaviour due to a 'blanket rule' to curb bad behaviour from scrotes.
This was the key quote in that article.
"Green said the rule had to be applied across the board, in order for no one group to complain about discrimination."What weak bullshit. How about 'we decide whether our security is at risk from a hidden face'
Shouldn't be wearing a hat inside in the first place. Hipster scum.
-
@Crucial said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@MN5 said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
Your heart just goes out to those people living under oppression. Don't read this if you get butthurt easily.
I side with her actually. It's lowest common denominator stuff when the average law abiding person has to change their behaviour due to a 'blanket rule' to curb bad behaviour from scrotes.
This was the key quote in that article.
"Green said the rule had to be applied across the board, in order for no one group to complain about discrimination."What weak bullshit. How about 'we decide whether our security is at risk from a hidden face'
It's Masterton. Everyone there is hat wearing trash.
-
@MN5 said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
Your heart just goes out to those people living under oppression. Don't read this if you get butthurt easily.
Rude bitch. No hats on inside. Simple etiquette. Only exception is a lady in a chuch. This was not a church.
-
@Crucial said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
@MN5 said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:
Your heart just goes out to those people living under oppression. Don't read this if you get butthurt easily.
I side with her actually. It's lowest common denominator stuff when the average law abiding person has to change their behaviour due to a 'blanket rule' to curb bad behaviour from scrotes.
This was the key quote in that article.
"Green said the rule had to be applied across the board, in order for no one group to complain about discrimination."What weak bullshit. How about 'we decide whether our security is at risk from a hidden face'
Crucial. I'm surprised you support discrimination...
-
Stuff
