Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

The Ashes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
662 Posts 46 Posters 74.2k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #176

    The problem with enforcing the follow-on is if the other team bats well you find yourself batting last in the most difficult conditions, under all sorts of pressure. In this case it made sense given the new ball under lights, but I can see why teams are more reluctant nowadays given the way pitches can flatten out during the middle stages of a test.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • barbarianB Offline
      barbarianB Offline
      barbarian
      wrote on last edited by
      #177

      Hindsight is a marvellous thing. Smith would obviously regret not enforcing, like Root would regret not batting first.

      But that analysis is too simple. England bowled beautifully last night. Only a handful of loose deliveries in 27 overs. If they'd bowled like that on the first morning we'd have a very different game.

      Australia could have had England 4-50. Or they could be a bit ragged and let England get to 1-80. On a flattish pitch they set us 150, which we have to chase... under lights.

      Root's decision to bowl was negated by his own bowlers, much like Smith's decision to bat was negated by his fragile top order.

      First hour is critical. We get through with only 1-2 down then we can push the lead out to 300+, but there's a chance we're skittled quickly and then it's game on.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dKD Offline
        dKD Offline
        dK
        wrote on last edited by
        #178

        75-6, 290 run lead. Need minimum another 60-70 runs. Then bowl them out at dusk

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • RapidoR Offline
          RapidoR Offline
          Rapido
          wrote on last edited by
          #179

          KP is a terrible commentator.

          "Umpires are too scared to make a decision ..." wtf?

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • MN5M MN5

            @virgil said in The Ashes:

            Well Marsh has guaranteed himself another 3 years of selection with that 100

            @NTA thoughts on this?

            NTAN Offline
            NTAN Offline
            NTA
            wrote on last edited by
            #180

            @mn5 said in The Ashes:

            @virgil said in The Ashes:

            Well Marsh has guaranteed himself another 3 years of selection with that 100

            @NTA thoughts on this?

            alt text

            1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • NTAN Offline
              NTAN Offline
              NTA
              wrote on last edited by
              #181

              Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

              Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

              Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

              CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • NTAN NTA

                Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

                Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

                Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

                CatograndeC Offline
                CatograndeC Offline
                Catogrande
                wrote on last edited by
                #182

                @nta said in The Ashes:

                Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

                Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

                Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

                I'll go for option two please.

                boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • CatograndeC Catogrande

                  @nta said in The Ashes:

                  Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

                  Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

                  Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

                  I'll go for option two please.

                  boobooB Offline
                  boobooB Offline
                  booboo
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #183

                  @catogrande said in The Ashes:

                  @nta said in The Ashes:

                  Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

                  Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

                  Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

                  I'll go for option two please.

                  In the balance. I'm thinking 60-40 Aus wins. (Maybe 65-35).

                  Root still there after the evening session. That is yuuge.

                  Not to follow on is STIILL a shit decision. I have to disagree with you @Siam. Putting yourself at the mercy of Jimmy Anderson with a pink ball in the evening just opened the door. They may get away with it but I still don't see any logic.

                  V dogmeatD 2 Replies Last reply
                  1
                  • boobooB booboo

                    @catogrande said in The Ashes:

                    @nta said in The Ashes:

                    Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

                    Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

                    Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

                    I'll go for option two please.

                    In the balance. I'm thinking 60-40 Aus wins. (Maybe 65-35).

                    Root still there after the evening session. That is yuuge.

                    Not to follow on is STIILL a shit decision. I have to disagree with you @Siam. Putting yourself at the mercy of Jimmy Anderson with a pink ball in the evening just opened the door. They may get away with it but I still don't see any logic.

                    V Offline
                    V Offline
                    Virgil
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #184

                    @booboo said in The Ashes:

                    @catogrande said in The Ashes:

                    @nta said in The Ashes:

                    Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

                    Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

                    Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

                    I'll go for option two please.

                    In the balance. I'm thinking 60-40 Aus wins. (Maybe 65-35).

                    Root still there after the evening session. That is yuuge.

                    Not to follow on is STIILL a shit decision. I have to disagree with you @Siam. Putting yourself at the mercy of Jimmy Anderson with a pink ball in the evening just opened the door. They may get away with it but I still don't see any logic.

                    Just proves crybaby Smith isn’t as clever as he thinks he is.
                    Likely to get away with it but at the very least they have given guys like Anderson some confidence that they can knock over the Aussie batsmen

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • NTAN Offline
                      NTAN Offline
                      NTA
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #185

                      @virgil said in The Ashes:

                      Just proves crybaby Smith isn’t as clever as he thinks he is.

                      If he wins, he is.

                      England have shown a bit more spine, and discipline, with bat and ball in the last 48 hours. If we had enforced the follow on and bowled like this, we'd be 130-odd overs into it, with heightened risk of injury and fatigue to our bowling attack with half a series to play.

                      Whichever way this match ends up, it's still comforting to know you're a bitter little man when it comes to everything Australian. 🙂

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • KiwiPieK Offline
                        KiwiPieK Offline
                        KiwiPie
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #186

                        This match is superbly poised. Was gripping viewing last night. Root is so far ahead of the other English batsmen in technique and he needed a bit of luck. Really hard to predict how today will go - but Root has to bat through or at least bat long enough to get close so the tail can hit out. These chases tend to have a life of their own the closer they get - batsmen get more nervous and so do bowlers.

                        I'm thinking England will do it but Root edging his first ball today to the keeper may make me change my mind ...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • RapidoR Offline
                          RapidoR Offline
                          Rapido
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #187

                          Aussies in a cake walk. Only Root is any good. I reckon Aussies by 90ish.

                          RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • RapidoR Rapido

                            Aussies in a cake walk. Only Root is any good. I reckon Aussies by 90ish.

                            RapidoR Offline
                            RapidoR Offline
                            Rapido
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #188

                            @rapido said in The Ashes:

                            Aussies in a cake walk. Only Root is any good. I reckon Aussies by 90ish.

                            I watched most of the night session last night, was good cricket to watch, even with an old ball.

                            Love day/night tests and the uncertainty that is brought by the newness of the ball at the time the sun goes down.

                            I'd imagine, I'm not that old, it must be like the old days of uncovered pitches when sometimes teams would reverse batting orders while wicket was still sticky.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • boobooB booboo

                              @catogrande said in The Ashes:

                              @nta said in The Ashes:

                              Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

                              Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

                              Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

                              I'll go for option two please.

                              In the balance. I'm thinking 60-40 Aus wins. (Maybe 65-35).

                              Root still there after the evening session. That is yuuge.

                              Not to follow on is STIILL a shit decision. I have to disagree with you @Siam. Putting yourself at the mercy of Jimmy Anderson with a pink ball in the evening just opened the door. They may get away with it but I still don't see any logic.

                              dogmeatD Offline
                              dogmeatD Offline
                              dogmeat
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #189

                              @booboo said in The Ashes:

                              @catogrande said in The Ashes:

                              @nta said in The Ashes:

                              Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

                              Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

                              Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

                              I'll go for option two please.

                              In the balance. I'm thinking 60-40 Aus wins. (Maybe 65-35).

                              .

                              Sorry I would have Oz at 85% minimum. I'd be very happy to be proved wrong but Aussie need effectively 3 wickets because the rest will contribute about 30 runs.

                              boobooB KiwiPieK 2 Replies Last reply
                              1
                              • dogmeatD dogmeat

                                @booboo said in The Ashes:

                                @catogrande said in The Ashes:

                                @nta said in The Ashes:

                                Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

                                Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

                                Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

                                I'll go for option two please.

                                In the balance. I'm thinking 60-40 Aus wins. (Maybe 65-35).

                                .

                                Sorry I would have Oz at 85% minimum. I'd be very happy to be proved wrong but Aussie need effectively 3 wickets because the rest will contribute about 30 runs.

                                boobooB Offline
                                boobooB Offline
                                booboo
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #190

                                @dogmeat said in The Ashes:

                                @booboo said in The Ashes:

                                @catogrande said in The Ashes:

                                @nta said in The Ashes:

                                Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

                                Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

                                Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

                                I'll go for option two please.

                                In the balance. I'm thinking 60-40 Aus wins. (Maybe 65-35).

                                .

                                Sorry I would have Oz at 85% minimum. I'd be very happy to be proved wrong but Aussie need effectively 3 wickets because the rest will contribute about 30 runs.

                                May be a touch of wishful thinking but this c ould go either way.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • barbarianB Offline
                                  barbarianB Offline
                                  barbarian
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #191

                                  It's very evenly poised. I think the Poms have enough depth in Woakes, Ali, Bairstow and Overton to support Root. It's really a 50/50 and will come down to a couple of half-chances in the field IMO.

                                  From a series perspective, I'm kind of hoping the Poms get there. Just a little bit. It's been so long since we've had a genuinely live Ashes series coming into the 5th test, and you'd think if we win then it's highly unlikely England will fight back at the WACA.

                                  CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • MN5M Offline
                                    MN5M Offline
                                    MN5
                                    wrote on last edited by MN5
                                    #192

                                    It's all down to how good the root is. The quality of the root as it were.....

                                    Like so many other things in life.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • barbarianB barbarian

                                      It's very evenly poised. I think the Poms have enough depth in Woakes, Ali, Bairstow and Overton to support Root. It's really a 50/50 and will come down to a couple of half-chances in the field IMO.

                                      From a series perspective, I'm kind of hoping the Poms get there. Just a little bit. It's been so long since we've had a genuinely live Ashes series coming into the 5th test, and you'd think if we win then it's highly unlikely England will fight back at the WACA.

                                      CatograndeC Offline
                                      CatograndeC Offline
                                      Catogrande
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #193

                                      @barbarian said in The Ashes:

                                      It's very evenly poised. I think the Poms have enough depth in Woakes, Ali, Bairstow and Overton to support Root. It's really a 50/50 and will come down to a couple of half-chances in the field IMO.

                                      From a series perspective, I'm kind of hoping the Poms get there. Just a little bit. It's been so long since we've had a genuinely live Ashes series coming into the 5th test, and you'd think if we win then it's highly unlikely England will fight back at the WACA.

                                      Woakes in as nightwatchman and he can bat OK. After that there is both Ali and Bairstow that can change the course of a game, so on paper we're still in it. I don't see this though, I feel that if Root goes then the house of cards falls. I can't really say why I don't have any confidence but It just seems to me that our recent results have flattered us somewhat.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • Beige XIB Offline
                                        Beige XIB Offline
                                        Beige XI
                                        wrote on last edited by Beige XI
                                        #194

                                        I was talking to my brother today and we agreed that it's still an 80/20 chance for Australia to win. It looks like the bookmakers give England a marginally better chance than that but still have Aus warm favs. I hope England get up though - it would be nice to still be watching a live series over Christmas.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dogmeatD dogmeat

                                          @booboo said in The Ashes:

                                          @catogrande said in The Ashes:

                                          @nta said in The Ashes:

                                          Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

                                          Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

                                          Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

                                          I'll go for option two please.

                                          In the balance. I'm thinking 60-40 Aus wins. (Maybe 65-35).

                                          .

                                          Sorry I would have Oz at 85% minimum. I'd be very happy to be proved wrong but Aussie need effectively 3 wickets because the rest will contribute about 30 runs.

                                          KiwiPieK Offline
                                          KiwiPieK Offline
                                          KiwiPie
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #195

                                          @dogmeat said in The Ashes:

                                          @booboo said in The Ashes:

                                          @catogrande said in The Ashes:

                                          @nta said in The Ashes:

                                          Well this could get interesting. Starc is putting down a couple of crackers each over, and following it with shit.

                                          Lyon is all over left- and right-handers, but nothing is sticking.

                                          Poms could do this... or collapse in a screaming heap.

                                          I'll go for option two please.

                                          In the balance. I'm thinking 60-40 Aus wins. (Maybe 65-35).

                                          .

                                          Sorry I would have Oz at 85% minimum. I'd be very happy to be proved wrong but Aussie need effectively 3 wickets because the rest will contribute about 30 runs.

                                          They added around 90 from 7 down in the first innings - anything is possible when you have a target to aim at - and also it is entirely possible to focus so hard on the target that you play a dumb shot ....

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search