Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

The Ashes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
662 Posts 46 Posters 74.3k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #254

    When i heard that this story came from the sun i didn't even bother with the mental ramifications of how this spotfixing in a test match could ever possibly work.

    Fake news ruleth the world

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • JKJ Offline
      JKJ Offline
      JK
      wrote on last edited by JK
      #255

      The Sun are indeed one of the worst!

      Wasnt there a similar bit of news that broke before another game recently? The timing is amazing

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • JKJ Offline
        JKJ Offline
        JK
        wrote on last edited by
        #256

        England won the toss and having a bat too btw

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

          @mn5 can't read either?

          Dunno, looks a bunch of rubbish about a network of players around the world fixing spot-betting situations. It's not so much match results, as fall of wicket/number of runs, that kind of rubbish.

          Apparently, The Sun has done an investigation, and handed over their info to "cricket chiefs".

          The article is very short on detail, but very big on boastful Indians.

          NTAN Offline
          NTAN Offline
          NTA
          wrote on last edited by
          #257

          @mariner4life said in The Ashes:

          but very big on boastful Indians.

          Are you sure its about cricket? :thinking:

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • MN5M Offline
            MN5M Offline
            MN5
            wrote on last edited by
            #258

            http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/21745779/inside-remaking-mitchell-marsh

            @NTA @mariner4life something to read on the shitter later this avo

            SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • MN5M MN5

              http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/21745779/inside-remaking-mitchell-marsh

              @NTA @mariner4life something to read on the shitter later this avo

              SnowyS Offline
              SnowyS Offline
              Snowy
              wrote on last edited by
              #259

              @mn5 said in The Ashes:

              http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/21745779/inside-remaking-mitchell-marsh

              @NTA @mariner4life something to read on the shitter later this avo

              Something to put in the shitter.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • DonsteppaD Offline
                DonsteppaD Offline
                Donsteppa
                wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
                #260

                Cook and Root once again doing a poor job of the Senior Player in an Ashes Test role...

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • NTAN Offline
                  NTAN Offline
                  NTA
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #261

                  Fuck Mitch Marsh for dropping that easy catch

                  Fuck Cameron Bancroft for dropping another fairly simple catch

                  Fuck Shaun Marsh because... Well because he's there. Fuck him.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  8
                  • NTAN Offline
                    NTAN Offline
                    NTA
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #262

                    But good ton from Malan. Best Saffer wearing three lions since Skunkboi

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • NTAN Offline
                      NTAN Offline
                      NTA
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #263

                      Great fight by Stoneman, Malan and Bairstow today really setting England up for a draw at worst. Weather for days 4 and 5 is reportedly dodgy so they may miss a classic victory here.

                      Fuck Marsh(es).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • dogmeatD Offline
                        dogmeatD Offline
                        dogmeat
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #264

                        What surprised me was how short Oz bowled when the common wisdom is pitch it up.

                        Total wasted effort. I only saw the last session but I don't think I saw one they dug in cause any trouble for the batsman - and as for the review - fucking muppets

                        Mind you apart from the first over with the second new ball Malan and Bairstow looked totally untroubled.

                        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dogmeatD dogmeat

                          What surprised me was how short Oz bowled when the common wisdom is pitch it up.

                          Total wasted effort. I only saw the last session but I don't think I saw one they dug in cause any trouble for the batsman - and as for the review - fucking muppets

                          Mind you apart from the first over with the second new ball Malan and Bairstow looked totally untroubled.

                          NTAN Offline
                          NTAN Offline
                          NTA
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #265

                          @dogmeat the short stuff worked Stoneman over nicely, and then Mitchell "Fucking" Marsh dropped him. Malan was taking it on and not always executing cleanly. It wasn't a bad tactic considering a lot of the full stuff was disappearing to the fence.

                          Keeping it full on that pitch, with a wearing ball, was a recipe for getting driven repeatedly. With the new ball we had another chance put down, then a bunch of streaky edges through slip. None of the LBWs were sticking because of height.

                          That review was, again, fucking stupid.

                          The execution could have been better, but there was a lot to like about the short ball work in the middle of the day.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • NTAN Offline
                            NTAN Offline
                            NTA
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #266

                            Another stupid review. NEVER believe the bowler

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mariner4lifeM Online
                              mariner4lifeM Online
                              mariner4life
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #267

                              That review this morning was disgraceful, and just reeked of desperation. Not sure you can blame Starc, he didn't look overly convinced. Someone must have been, despite an awful lot of stumps showing. Very poor cricket.

                              NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mariner4lifeM Online
                                mariner4lifeM Online
                                mariner4life
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #268

                                Handscomb does more as sub fielder than Mitch Marsh will this entire game.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • NTAN Offline
                                  NTAN Offline
                                  NTA
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #269

                                  Might get away with under 420 if we can keep up some pressure on the tail

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mariner4lifeM Online
                                    mariner4lifeM Online
                                    mariner4life
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #270

                                    solid collapse, 420 would be overs from here

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • RapidoR Offline
                                      RapidoR Offline
                                      Rapido
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #271

                                      This England team have such a weak lower order.

                                      And a weak top order.

                                      Thus will probably be their highest score of the series.

                                      Bowling round the wicket from ball one at number 11's body is not on though IMO, no matter how much bad blood there is between Anderson and the Aussies.

                                      VirgilV 1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • RapidoR Rapido

                                        This England team have such a weak lower order.

                                        And a weak top order.

                                        Thus will probably be their highest score of the series.

                                        Bowling round the wicket from ball one at number 11's body is not on though IMO, no matter how much bad blood there is between Anderson and the Aussies.

                                        VirgilV Do not disturb
                                        VirgilV Do not disturb
                                        Virgil
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #272

                                        @rapido said in The Ashes:

                                        This England team have such a weak lower order.

                                        And a weak top order.

                                        Thus will probably be their highest score of the series.

                                        Bowling round the wicket from ball one at number 11's body is not on though IMO, no matter how much bad blood there is between Anderson and the Aussies.

                                        Winning at all costs is the straya way

                                        SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dogmeatD Offline
                                          dogmeatD Offline
                                          dogmeat
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #273

                                          Crying crocodile tears over Phil Hughes death, pledging behaviour had to change and then quickly reverting to type is also the Australian way it seems.

                                          I don't really have an issue with the behaviour at all but every so often I sniff a whiff of hypocrisy from all involved

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          6
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search