Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Exodus 2018

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.0k Posts 74 Posters 127.7k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Derm McCrum

    @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

    @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

    @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

    @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

    @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

    @pot-hale something would have to forthcoming from the host unions, as i doubt we can afford to send 70-odd players north for a month. (wouldn't that constitute about 40% of our fully-pro player base?).

    Agreed. But the NZ Maori have travelled previously so it’s possible. Hell, NZ could select players based in Europe if they wanted.

    That is the exact opposite of our policy.

    And? Your policy relates to the senior team, not the junior team. If you want to capture more young Kiwi players and mix them with a couple of old heads, what’s the problem?

    because our official line is "leave, and you are dead to us"

    and I'm happy with that

    Hmmm. I hear what you’re saying but something needs to change.

    NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #308

    @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

    @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

    @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

    @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

    @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

    @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

    @pot-hale something would have to forthcoming from the host unions, as i doubt we can afford to send 70-odd players north for a month. (wouldn't that constitute about 40% of our fully-pro player base?).

    Agreed. But the NZ Maori have travelled previously so it’s possible. Hell, NZ could select players based in Europe if they wanted.

    That is the exact opposite of our policy.

    And? Your policy relates to the senior team, not the junior team. If you want to capture more young Kiwi players and mix them with a couple of old heads, what’s the problem?

    because our official line is "leave, and you are dead to us"

    and I'm happy with that

    Hmmm. I hear what you’re saying but something needs to change.

    No it doesn't. We lose players overseas all the time. There is only so many high paying spots in NZ.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • taniwharugbyT Offline
      taniwharugbyT Offline
      taniwharugby
      wrote on last edited by
      #309

      I think the day NZ changes it's stance on selecting players form overseas is the beginning of the end of INternational rugby, for NZ at least

      1 Reply Last reply
      6
      • D Derm McCrum

        @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

        @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

        @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

        @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

        @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

        @pot-hale something would have to forthcoming from the host unions, as i doubt we can afford to send 70-odd players north for a month. (wouldn't that constitute about 40% of our fully-pro player base?).

        Agreed. But the NZ Maori have travelled previously so it’s possible. Hell, NZ could select players based in Europe if they wanted.

        That is the exact opposite of our policy.

        And? Your policy relates to the senior team, not the junior team. If you want to capture more young Kiwi players and mix them with a couple of old heads, what’s the problem?

        because our official line is "leave, and you are dead to us"

        and I'm happy with that

        Hmmm. I hear what you’re saying but something needs to change.

        mariner4lifeM Online
        mariner4lifeM Online
        mariner4life
        wrote on last edited by
        #310

        @pot-hale indeed it does. Mainly up North with your ridiculous structure and inability to produce your own talent.

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • NepiaN Nepia

          @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

          @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

          @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

          @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

          @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

          @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

          @pot-hale something would have to forthcoming from the host unions, as i doubt we can afford to send 70-odd players north for a month. (wouldn't that constitute about 40% of our fully-pro player base?).

          Agreed. But the NZ Maori have travelled previously so it’s possible. Hell, NZ could select players based in Europe if they wanted.

          That is the exact opposite of our policy.

          And? Your policy relates to the senior team, not the junior team. If you want to capture more young Kiwi players and mix them with a couple of old heads, what’s the problem?

          because our official line is "leave, and you are dead to us"

          and I'm happy with that

          Hmmm. I hear what you’re saying but something needs to change.

          No it doesn't. We lose players overseas all the time. There is only so many high paying spots in NZ.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Derm McCrum
          wrote on last edited by Derm McCrum
          #311

          @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

          @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

          @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

          @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

          @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

          @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

          @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

          @pot-hale something would have to forthcoming from the host unions, as i doubt we can afford to send 70-odd players north for a month. (wouldn't that constitute about 40% of our fully-pro player base?).

          Agreed. But the NZ Maori have travelled previously so it’s possible. Hell, NZ could select players based in Europe if they wanted.

          That is the exact opposite of our policy.

          And? Your policy relates to the senior team, not the junior team. If you want to capture more young Kiwi players and mix them with a couple of old heads, what’s the problem?

          because our official line is "leave, and you are dead to us"

          and I'm happy with that

          Hmmm. I hear what you’re saying but something needs to change.

          No it doesn't. We lose players overseas all the time. There is only so many high paying spots in NZ.

          Yeah but lose how many and how often? There’s 18 Kiwi-born players in Ireland currently - about 6-7 with parents/GP. 36 SH players.
          98 SH born in total across the Irish, Welsh, Scottish and Italian teams out of 671 players.

          NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

            @pot-hale indeed it does. Mainly up North with your ridiculous structure and inability to produce your own talent.

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Derm McCrum
            wrote on last edited by
            #312

            @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

            @pot-hale indeed it does. Mainly up North with your ridiculous structure and inability to produce your own talent.

            Your = the whole of the Northern Hemisphere?

            mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Derm McCrum

              @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

              @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

              @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

              @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

              @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

              @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

              @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

              @pot-hale something would have to forthcoming from the host unions, as i doubt we can afford to send 70-odd players north for a month. (wouldn't that constitute about 40% of our fully-pro player base?).

              Agreed. But the NZ Maori have travelled previously so it’s possible. Hell, NZ could select players based in Europe if they wanted.

              That is the exact opposite of our policy.

              And? Your policy relates to the senior team, not the junior team. If you want to capture more young Kiwi players and mix them with a couple of old heads, what’s the problem?

              because our official line is "leave, and you are dead to us"

              and I'm happy with that

              Hmmm. I hear what you’re saying but something needs to change.

              No it doesn't. We lose players overseas all the time. There is only so many high paying spots in NZ.

              Yeah but lose how many and how often? There’s 18 Kiwi-born players in Ireland currently - about 6-7 with parents/GP. 36 SH players.
              98 SH born in total across the Irish, Welsh, Scottish and Italian teams out of 671 players.

              NepiaN Offline
              NepiaN Offline
              Nepia
              wrote on last edited by
              #313

              @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

              @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

              @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

              @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

              @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

              @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

              @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

              @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

              @pot-hale something would have to forthcoming from the host unions, as i doubt we can afford to send 70-odd players north for a month. (wouldn't that constitute about 40% of our fully-pro player base?).

              Agreed. But the NZ Maori have travelled previously so it’s possible. Hell, NZ could select players based in Europe if they wanted.

              That is the exact opposite of our policy.

              And? Your policy relates to the senior team, not the junior team. If you want to capture more young Kiwi players and mix them with a couple of old heads, what’s the problem?

              because our official line is "leave, and you are dead to us"

              and I'm happy with that

              Hmmm. I hear what you’re saying but something needs to change.

              No it doesn't. We lose players overseas all the time. There is only so many high paying spots in NZ.

              Yeah but lose how many and how often? There’s 18 Kiwi-born players in Ireland currently - about 6-7 with parents/GP. 36 SH players.
              98 SH born in total across the Irish, Welsh, Scottish and Italian teams out of 671 players.

              We've lost the most numbers of players in the last 10 years, we've also been the best team in the world for those 10 years. We're not really losing the top echelon of players. Our depth is being eroded, and of course that's a concern, but the JAB aren't going to solve that.

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Derm McCrum

                @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

                @pot-hale indeed it does. Mainly up North with your ridiculous structure and inability to produce your own talent.

                Your = the whole of the Northern Hemisphere?

                mariner4lifeM Online
                mariner4lifeM Online
                mariner4life
                wrote on last edited by
                #314

                @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

                @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

                @pot-hale indeed it does. Mainly up North with your ridiculous structure and inability to produce your own talent.

                Your = the whole of the Northern Hemisphere?

                blanket your

                also a few 😀 😀 😀

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • NepiaN Nepia

                  @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

                  @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

                  @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

                  @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

                  @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

                  @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

                  @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

                  @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

                  @pot-hale something would have to forthcoming from the host unions, as i doubt we can afford to send 70-odd players north for a month. (wouldn't that constitute about 40% of our fully-pro player base?).

                  Agreed. But the NZ Maori have travelled previously so it’s possible. Hell, NZ could select players based in Europe if they wanted.

                  That is the exact opposite of our policy.

                  And? Your policy relates to the senior team, not the junior team. If you want to capture more young Kiwi players and mix them with a couple of old heads, what’s the problem?

                  because our official line is "leave, and you are dead to us"

                  and I'm happy with that

                  Hmmm. I hear what you’re saying but something needs to change.

                  No it doesn't. We lose players overseas all the time. There is only so many high paying spots in NZ.

                  Yeah but lose how many and how often? There’s 18 Kiwi-born players in Ireland currently - about 6-7 with parents/GP. 36 SH players.
                  98 SH born in total across the Irish, Welsh, Scottish and Italian teams out of 671 players.

                  We've lost the most numbers of players in the last 10 years, we've also been the best team in the world for those 10 years. We're not really losing the top echelon of players. Our depth is being eroded, and of course that's a concern, but the JAB aren't going to solve that.

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Derm McCrum
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #315

                  @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

                  @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

                  @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

                  @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

                  @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

                  @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

                  @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

                  @pot-hale said in Exodus 2018:

                  @mariner4life said in Exodus 2018:

                  @pot-hale something would have to forthcoming from the host unions, as i doubt we can afford to send 70-odd players north for a month. (wouldn't that constitute about 40% of our fully-pro player base?).

                  Agreed. But the NZ Maori have travelled previously so it’s possible. Hell, NZ could select players based in Europe if they wanted.

                  That is the exact opposite of our policy.

                  And? Your policy relates to the senior team, not the junior team. If you want to capture more young Kiwi players and mix them with a couple of old heads, what’s the problem?

                  because our official line is "leave, and you are dead to us"

                  and I'm happy with that

                  Hmmm. I hear what you’re saying but something needs to change.

                  No it doesn't. We lose players overseas all the time. There is only so many high paying spots in NZ.

                  Yeah but lose how many and how often? There’s 18 Kiwi-born players in Ireland currently - about 6-7 with parents/GP. 36 SH players.
                  98 SH born in total across the Irish, Welsh, Scottish and Italian teams out of 671 players.

                  We've lost the most numbers of players in the last 10 years, we've also been the best team in the world for those 10 years. We're not really losing the top echelon of players. Our depth is being eroded, and of course that's a concern, but the JAB aren't going to solve that.

                  Ok

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • TimT Away
                    TimT Away
                    Tim
                    wrote on last edited by Tim
                    #316

                    So who are the good (head) coaches active in NZ at the moment?

                    The list is pretty thin - Robertson and Plumtree.

                    Umaga, Mauger, and Cooper are all rather mediocre.

                    How the hell did Mauger get a Super Rugby appointment?

                    Leon MacDonald doesn't seem interested in higher ambitions, but Tom Coventry looks like a good option.

                    Cooper is decidedly uninspiring. The Maori were awful under him.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Billy TellB Offline
                      Billy TellB Offline
                      Billy Tell
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #317

                      My understanding: players who also qualified for the Islands were reluctant to play for the JABs, in case a solitary cap ruled them out of all future international rugby.

                      Junior is a stupid name for the B side anyways.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • J Offline
                        J Offline
                        jauzy019
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #318

                        http://www.ubbrugby.com/ubb/actualite/6436-le-all-black-tamanivalu-s-engage-a-l-ubb.html

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F family man

                          @stargazer there is no junior all blacks though which makes the 7’s as the other team

                          boobooB Online
                          boobooB Online
                          booboo
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #319

                          @family-man said in Exodus 2018:

                          @stargazer there is no junior all blacks though which makes the 7’s as the other team

                          No

                          F 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • boobooB booboo

                            @family-man said in Exodus 2018:

                            @stargazer there is no junior all blacks though which makes the 7’s as the other team

                            No

                            F Offline
                            F Offline
                            family man
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #320

                            @booboo yes

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F family man

                              @stargazer the Nz 7’s are the 2nd team now that can mean players can’t play for another country except that loophole for 7’s during Olympics

                              CrucialC Offline
                              CrucialC Offline
                              Crucial
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #321

                              @family-man said in Exodus 2018:

                              @stargazer the Nz 7’s are the 2nd team now that can mean players can’t play for another country except that loophole for 7’s during Olympics

                              No. The JABs are still the official 2nd team listed with World Rugby. The 7s have always been a team considered under WR eligibility rules.

                              It is a deliberate loophole use by some countries that they name a
                              Team they never select for the reasons stated by others.
                              Playing for a DevXV is attractive to players as it doesn’t lock them in and attractive to selectors as they get to see how well players do before making decisions

                              F 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • CrucialC Crucial

                                @family-man said in Exodus 2018:

                                @stargazer the Nz 7’s are the 2nd team now that can mean players can’t play for another country except that loophole for 7’s during Olympics

                                No. The JABs are still the official 2nd team listed with World Rugby. The 7s have always been a team considered under WR eligibility rules.

                                It is a deliberate loophole use by some countries that they name a
                                Team they never select for the reasons stated by others.
                                Playing for a DevXV is attractive to players as it doesn’t lock them in and attractive to selectors as they get to see how well players do before making decisions

                                F Offline
                                F Offline
                                family man
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #322

                                @crucial I understand the point you make but as there is no junior all blacks team and has not been for a few years now(in that respect) the Nz 7’s are in Nz terms the 2nd team until therjunior all blacks start up again

                                CrucialC boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • F family man

                                  @crucial I understand the point you make but as there is no junior all blacks team and has not been for a few years now(in that respect) the Nz 7’s are in Nz terms the 2nd team until therjunior all blacks start up again

                                  CrucialC Offline
                                  CrucialC Offline
                                  Crucial
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #323

                                  @family-man said in Exodus 2018:

                                  @crucial I understand the point you make but as there is no junior all blacks team and has not been for a few years now(in that respect) the Nz 7’s are in Nz terms the 2nd team until therjunior all blacks start up again

                                  You are talking about 2 entirely different things though.

                                  We have never used the 7s to lock in players for XVs but players do know that under WR rules they are committed once they play (Olympic thing aside)

                                  I get what you are saying as well but the 7s are not (and never have been) our 2nd team. They are a different method of eligibility setting.

                                  We simply do not play a '2nd team' (except when selecting the first team against a minnow nation)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • F family man

                                    @crucial I understand the point you make but as there is no junior all blacks team and has not been for a few years now(in that respect) the Nz 7’s are in Nz terms the 2nd team until therjunior all blacks start up again

                                    boobooB Online
                                    boobooB Online
                                    booboo
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #324

                                    @family-man said in Exodus 2018:

                                    @crucial I understand the point you make but as there is no junior all blacks team and has not been for a few years now(in that respect) the Nz 7’s are in Nz terms the 2nd team until therjunior all blacks start up again

                                    Ok. I get your point. You're right in the first part of this statement but wrong in semantics. 7s are not the 2nd team by definition but they are because there NZR don't run an A team. They are not the Second Team, they are the second team.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      jauzy019
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #325

                                      Hello guys, i'm looking for a good NZ scrumhalf who isn't part of a Super Rugby squad. Can you help me please ?

                                      K 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • BonesB Offline
                                        BonesB Offline
                                        Bones
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #326

                                        @taniwharugby

                                        taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • J jauzy019

                                          Hello guys, i'm looking for a good NZ scrumhalf who isn't part of a Super Rugby squad. Can you help me please ?

                                          K Offline
                                          K Offline
                                          Kiwidom
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #327

                                          @jauzy019 There isn't too many good halfbacks without a super contract at present. Am thinking of Billy Guyton, kylem O'Donnell, Té Aihe Toma, jono hickey and Chris smiley (whose getting on a bit in age now). O'Donnell looked pretty good at times for taranaki last season though

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search