All Blacks v France Test #2
-
Ruined test but that's the laws and ref had no choice. But for me this is the French, they need to deal with it and not capitulate. Last year vs Lions ABs lost SBW and led for most of game. All about mentality as was shown last week.
-
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
-
@tordah said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Does a HIA fail automatically mean he's concussed?
Yes. He has to pass one this week, before he can play again.
-
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
@baron-silas-greenback said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
Do you think he meant to tip him on his head?
-
DMac at five-eighth, so technically it's still an even game.
@antipodean said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
DMac at five-eighth, so technically it's still an even game.
And it will be claimed by media that he is capable of playing 10 for the ABs because they’ve had a comfortable win.
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
Do you think he meant to tip him on his head?
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@baron-silas-greenback said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
Do you think he meant to tip him on his head?
No idea. That's the point.
-
@tordah said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Does a HIA fail automatically mean he's concussed?
Yes. He has to pass one this week, before he can play again.
@baron-silas-greenback I think there are tests tomorrow and again on Monday and Tuesday whether he passes tomorrow's or not
-
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
@baron-silas-greenback said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
In basketball we call it tunnelling. It is a cardinal sin to attack the guy when he is jumping in the air
-
they tried the same move as in the WC final 2011 but O Franks is just a terrible ball runner
@tordah said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
they tried the same move as in the WC final 2011 but O Franks is just a terrible ball runner
Also the front pod didn't take out the french defenders like in that final. Close the gap!!
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
Do you think he meant to tip him on his head?
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@baron-silas-greenback said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
Do you think he meant to tip him on his head?
Irrelevant. Ben Smith pulled out of a contest last weekend because he did what Fall should have done. Checked his path while looking to contest the ball. Had he done it for a split second, he could have checked his run and smashed Beaudy when he landed.
-
@antipodean said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
DMac at five-eighth, so technically it's still an even game.
And it will be claimed by media that he is capable of playing 10 for the ABs because they’ve had a comfortable win.
-
@gunner DMAC has chosen to run lines for himself the first two touches, rather than distribute.
@kev said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@gunner DMAC has chosen to run lines for himself the first two touches, rather than distribute.
He's not a five-eighth's arse.
-
Why call him Jordan Barrett Mr Marshall, or if we are using birth names, Justina
-
Haha go quick tap, pass to the slow whitelock, barrett falls over, turnover.
Both teams know this game is a foregone conclusion
