Movie review thread...
-
-
@antipodean cheers, i was looking at watching this tonight but my mate told me it bombed.
-
@raznomore said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@antipodean cheers, i was looking at watching this tonight but my mate told me it bombed.
I was a few panheads in after eye surgery, but I'm a fan of Soviet crime genre.
-
@raznomore Except it's not DC so it wont be pants.
-
@nepia said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@raznomore Except it's not DC so it wont be pants.
Apart from Wonder Woman have they made anything decent since the Christian Bale Batman films?
-
@canefan said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@nepia said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@raznomore Except it's not DC so it wont be pants.
Apart from Wonder Woman have they made anything decent since the Christian Bale Batman films?
I find some of them watchable (but I'm not a Bale Batman uber fan - even though I'm a big fan of Nolan's non Batman films) but they just don't make them at the same level as Marvel. Hopefully Aquaman follows on from Wonder Woman and is decent.
-
@canefan said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@nepia said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@raznomore Except it's not DC so it wont be pants.
Apart from Wonder Woman have they made anything decent since the Christian Bale Batman films?
Nope.
-
-
Venom - 3 parasites out of 5 plots to destroy the world
Decent enough without really doing a great deal or trying too hard.
-
Zero Dark Thirty is just so fucking good. It might be one of my favourite movies now
-
@mariner4life said in Re: Movie review thread...:
Zero Dark Thirty is just so fucking good. It might be one of my favourite movies now
I think it is so much better than the Hurt Locker which won the Oscar.
Mortal Engines, average as fuck with uncharismatic actors (aside from Hugo Weaving) and lots of CGI (which is ok) and one character just disappears from the movie.
@bovidae said in Re: Movie review thread...:
I liked Suicide Squad, but I'm in the minority.
I liked it better than any of the Superman movies.
-
if there were odds on Mortal Engines being a failure I would have put the house and my dog on it.
Jackson was clever with Meet the Feebles.
Talented and witty with Braindead.
Someone doing a lot with not much on The Frighteners.
A genius with LOTR.
Ambitious, too reliant on CGI and not totally in touch with the audience on King Kong.
The Lovely Bones was where shit started to really go wrong. Too soppy too muddled too much reliance on unnecessary CGI. Again totally getting the audience wrong.
I know he's a producer now but you know he's micro managing the shit out of this latest effort.
-
@raznomore said in Re: Movie review thread...:
if there were odds on Mortal Engines being a failure I would have put the house and my dog on it.
Jackson was clever with Meet the Feebles.
Talented and witty with Braindead.
Someone doing a lot with not much on The Frighteners.
A genius with LOTR.
Ambitious, too reliant on CGI and not totally in touch with the audience on King Kong.
The Lovely Bones was where shit started to really go wrong. Too soppy too muddled too much reliance on unnecessary CGI. Again totally getting the audience wrong.
I know he's a producer now but you know he's micro managing the shit out of this latest effort.
Didn’t he also sack Ryan Gosling for Mark Wahlberg for Lovely Bones? Not great decision making there either
-
@kirwan said in Re: Movie review thread...:
Didn’t he also sack Ryan Gosling for Mark Wahlberg for Lovely Bones? Not great decision making there either
From IMDb:
The main reason Ryan Gosling quit his role as Jack before filming started, was that during read-through sessions with Peter Jackson and the rest of the cast, he felt that, at 26, he was too young for the role. Jack was supposed to be in his late 30s. Despite repeated assurances from Jackson that he could portray Jack with proper make-up, Gosling insisted that, as a method actor, he would not be able to portray the character well enough, and was finally let go. Mark Wahlberg was brought in only one day before shooting started.
-
@raznomore said in Re: Movie review thread...:
if there were odds on Mortal Engines being a failure I would have put the house and my dog on it.
Jackson was clever with Meet the Feebles.
Talented and witty with Braindead.
Someone doing a lot with not much on The Frighteners.
A genius with LOTR.
Ambitious, too reliant on CGI and not totally in touch with the audience on King Kong.
The Lovely Bones was where shit started to really go wrong. Too soppy too muddled too much reliance on unnecessary CGI. Again totally getting the audience wrong.
I know he's a producer now but you know he's micro managing the shit out of this latest effort.
The Peter Jackson-y type stuff (the world building and CGI) was actually the best part of the movie IMHO. The script (by Boyens, Walsh and Jackson) and cast selection were the biggest issues. A decent edit might have helped too.
-
@bovidae said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@kirwan said in Re: Movie review thread...:
Didn’t he also sack Ryan Gosling for Mark Wahlberg for Lovely Bones? Not great decision making there either
From IMDb:
The main reason Ryan Gosling quit his role as Jack before filming started, was that during read-through sessions with Peter Jackson and the rest of the cast, he felt that, at 26, he was too young for the role. Jack was supposed to be in his late 30s. Despite repeated assurances from Jackson that he could portray Jack with proper make-up, Gosling insisted that, as a method actor, he would not be able to portray the character well enough, and was finally let go. Mark Wahlberg was brought in only one day before shooting started.
Also he turned up fat .
Ryan Gosling: Why Peter Jackson Fired Me From ‘Lovely Bones’
In The Hollywood Reporter's annual actors roundtable discussion, the "Blue Valentine" star says Jackson disapproved of the 60 pounds he'd put on from "melting Haagen Dazs and drinking it."
-
@jegga said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@bovidae said in Re: Movie review thread...:
@kirwan said in Re: Movie review thread...:
Didn’t he also sack Ryan Gosling for Mark Wahlberg for Lovely Bones? Not great decision making there either
From IMDb:
The main reason Ryan Gosling quit his role as Jack before filming started, was that during read-through sessions with Peter Jackson and the rest of the cast, he felt that, at 26, he was too young for the role. Jack was supposed to be in his late 30s. Despite repeated assurances from Jackson that he could portray Jack with proper make-up, Gosling insisted that, as a method actor, he would not be able to portray the character well enough, and was finally let go. Mark Wahlberg was brought in only one day before shooting started.
Also he turned up fat .
Ryan Gosling: Why Peter Jackson Fired Me From ‘Lovely Bones’
In The Hollywood Reporter's annual actors roundtable discussion, the "Blue Valentine" star says Jackson disapproved of the 60 pounds he'd put on from "melting Haagen Dazs and drinking it."
This. He tried to make himself look more like he thought the character should look like, and got fired.
That’s on them not Gosling.
-
How I feel Jackson makes his movies is full of unrealistic sentiment and old fashioned nods to the audience. There's not edge to anything. The ideal audience for a Jackson movie is 70yo+ nana.
Man I wish Del Toro had stayed with the Hobbit production.
