Black Caps v India
-
If we had a fully fit unit (I mean, never gonna happen, but this is theoretical), I'd stick with my Anderson / Neesham 6/7 power hitting axis as suggested above, after Latham, Guppy, Kane, Rosco and Nicholls.
This leaves four spots for bowlers with Neesham / Anderson / Kane to share some overs. Boult is a given and I'd take a fully fit Milne over Ferguson in that express change bowler role. My other opening bowler would be Henry (record speaks for itself, he just needs games).
There is so much mixed opinion on playing two genuine spinners in England but I'd just play Sodhi as our attacking spinner.
So my 'ideal world' line-up would be Latham, Guptill, Kane, Rosco, Nicholls, Anderson, Neesham, Milne, Henry, Sodhi, Boult.
7 bowling options, batting to 7 followed by two bowlers who bat a bit (remember them both banging away against SL approx three years ago?)
Other squaddies would be Southee, Santner, Bracewell/de Grandhomme (I can't separate them!) and Seifert.
-
@Chris-B even little Kane...
debut test century in India?
But your point remains, our domestic scene ain't no finishing school
@Siam said in Black Caps v India:
@Chris-B even little Kane...
debut test century in India?
But your point remains, our domestic scene ain't no finishing school
And despite that great start - after 10 tests he had a sub-30 batting average.
-
If we had a fully fit unit (I mean, never gonna happen, but this is theoretical), I'd stick with my Anderson / Neesham 6/7 power hitting axis as suggested above, after Latham, Guppy, Kane, Rosco and Nicholls.
This leaves four spots for bowlers with Neesham / Anderson / Kane to share some overs. Boult is a given and I'd take a fully fit Milne over Ferguson in that express change bowler role. My other opening bowler would be Henry (record speaks for itself, he just needs games).
There is so much mixed opinion on playing two genuine spinners in England but I'd just play Sodhi as our attacking spinner.
So my 'ideal world' line-up would be Latham, Guptill, Kane, Rosco, Nicholls, Anderson, Neesham, Milne, Henry, Sodhi, Boult.
7 bowling options, batting to 7 followed by two bowlers who bat a bit (remember them both banging away against SL approx three years ago?)
Other squaddies would be Southee, Santner, Bracewell/de Grandhomme (I can't separate them!) and Seifert.
@shark I could live with your XI and XV and it won't be far away - though injuries will likely put paid to Anderson and Milne.
I'm not sold on Matt Henry, because he can't really bowl at the death, so I'd play Ferguson instead of him and have two fast options. Matt wouldn't make my XV is everyone was available.
I'd play Santner ahead of Ish, because Ish struggles to bowl six good balls in an over - plus Santner is a much better batsman.
I guess Seifert is as good as anyone as a back up keeper, but he's looked pretty ordinary with bat and gloves. Is that Craig Cachopa NZ eligible?
-
I'm fully on @shark 's bandwagon. Munro has to be gone.
Problem is, now the series pressure is off, I bet he carves as India have gone home (Kohli) and then it's T20
@Hooroo said in Black Caps v India:
I'm fully on @shark 's bandwagon. Munro has to be gone.
Problem is, now the series pressure is off, I bet he carves as India have gone home (Kohli) and then it's T20
I'm on that bandwagon too - but, it seems the selectors aren't.
Neesham and Todd Astle come into the squad - and Doug Bracewell and Ish Sodhi go home.
I suppose on the plus side, Munro hasn't been the worst so far in this series - that's Guptill (or de Grandhomme depending how you look at it). And Henry Nicholls needs a boot up the arse for having marginally worse stats than Munro, as well!
Best we can do with this squad is: Guptill, Latham, Kane, Rossco, Nicholls, Neesham, de Grandhomme, Santner, Boult - plus two of Southee/Ferguson/Astle/Henry depending on the pitch.
-
If we had a fully fit unit (I mean, never gonna happen, but this is theoretical), I'd stick with my Anderson / Neesham 6/7 power hitting axis as suggested above, after Latham, Guppy, Kane, Rosco and Nicholls.
This leaves four spots for bowlers with Neesham / Anderson / Kane to share some overs. Boult is a given and I'd take a fully fit Milne over Ferguson in that express change bowler role. My other opening bowler would be Henry (record speaks for itself, he just needs games).
There is so much mixed opinion on playing two genuine spinners in England but I'd just play Sodhi as our attacking spinner.
So my 'ideal world' line-up would be Latham, Guptill, Kane, Rosco, Nicholls, Anderson, Neesham, Milne, Henry, Sodhi, Boult.
7 bowling options, batting to 7 followed by two bowlers who bat a bit (remember them both banging away against SL approx three years ago?)
Other squaddies would be Southee, Santner, Bracewell/de Grandhomme (I can't separate them!) and Seifert.
@shark said in Black Caps v India:
If we had a fully fit unit (I mean, never gonna happen, but this is theoretical), I'd stick with my Anderson / Neesham 6/7 power hitting axis as suggested above, after Latham, Guppy, Kane, Rosco and Nicholls.
This leaves four spots for bowlers with Neesham / Anderson / Kane to share some overs. Boult is a given and I'd take a fully fit Milne over Ferguson in that express change bowler role. My other opening bowler would be Henry (record speaks for itself, he just needs games).
There is so much mixed opinion on playing two genuine spinners in England but I'd just play Sodhi as our attacking spinner.
So my 'ideal world' line-up would be Latham, Guptill, Kane, Rosco, Nicholls, Anderson, Neesham, Milne, Henry, Sodhi, Boult.
7 bowling options, batting to 7 followed by two bowlers who bat a bit (remember them both banging away against SL approx three years ago?)
Other squaddies would be Southee, Santner, Bracewell/de Grandhomme (I can't separate them!) and Seifert.
I love the look of that team except for maybe Santner in there which I agree is ironic considering some of my bagging of him.
Neesh/Anderson would be amazing if they both had blinders.
-
The only problem with Latham opening is he is our best player against spin, and has looked pretty comfortable against India in the middle overs despite not kicking on with his starts. If that is going to be a factor in England then it may be worth leaving him in the middle order.
Still, I think it's pretty clear (well it has been for ever really) that Munro is not much chop against a good quality bowling lineup. If we are serious about going all the way then he's not the answer, we at least need someone that can build an innings.
-
The only problem with Latham opening is he is our best player against spin, and has looked pretty comfortable against India in the middle overs despite not kicking on with his starts. If that is going to be a factor in England then it may be worth leaving him in the middle order.
Still, I think it's pretty clear (well it has been for ever really) that Munro is not much chop against a good quality bowling lineup. If we are serious about going all the way then he's not the answer, we at least need someone that can build an innings.
@No-Quarter said in Black Caps v India:
The only problem with Latham opening is he is our best player against spin, and has looked pretty comfortable against India in the middle overs despite not kicking on with his starts. If that is going to be a factor in England then it may be worth leaving him in the middle order.
That's a key point.
Also, it's a small sample, but he hasn't been a roaring success as a keeper opening the batting...
-
@Siam said in Black Caps v India:
@Chris-B even little Kane...
debut test century in India?
But your point remains, our domestic scene ain't no finishing school
And despite that great start - after 10 tests he had a sub-30 batting average.
-
I've bagged out the Indians in the past. Like, a lot. Their team was massively over-rated by their dominance at home, but then they sucked on the road.
Those days are well gone. That attack they have assembled is fucking classy. This summer, in Aus and in NZ, they have won games by regularly taking wickets throughout innings. They are able to build pressure with consistent plans; they have seamers with genuine pace; and of course the ubiquitous classy Indian spinners.
They are then backed up by a strong, if not dominant, batting lineup (led by a genuine star in Kohli) who are benefiting from the attack not putting them under too much pressure. Fuckers have learned to field as well.
It's been a nice little romp through Australasia for them this summer, and a great warm up for later in the year.
Watching yesterday it was amazing to watch two of our best ever batsmen get frustrated as the Indian's just gave them nothing.
Amazing to see an Indian team come here, take 3 times as many wickets as us, and then run down our meagre totals without anyone racking up a big score.
-
Re Henry, if his strength is taking the new ball and his second and third spells are suspect, then why not open the bowling with him and as long as he's going ok, give him a 6-7 over opening spell? Then as part of my side he may ot need to bowl the rest of his allocated overs given we'd have 7 options. Hell, you only need three frontliners to bowl their full complement and the other four share 20 overs!
-
I've bagged out the Indians in the past. Like, a lot. Their team was massively over-rated by their dominance at home, but then they sucked on the road.
Those days are well gone. That attack they have assembled is fucking classy. This summer, in Aus and in NZ, they have won games by regularly taking wickets throughout innings. They are able to build pressure with consistent plans; they have seamers with genuine pace; and of course the ubiquitous classy Indian spinners.
They are then backed up by a strong, if not dominant, batting lineup (led by a genuine star in Kohli) who are benefiting from the attack not putting them under too much pressure. Fuckers have learned to field as well.
It's been a nice little romp through Australasia for them this summer, and a great warm up for later in the year.
Watching yesterday it was amazing to watch two of our best ever batsmen get frustrated as the Indian's just gave them nothing.
Amazing to see an Indian team come here, take 3 times as many wickets as us, and then run down our meagre totals without anyone racking up a big score.
@mariner4life yep, and their "squad players " put out winning performances as well, no passengers at all in their squads.
Also they have 2 teenagers destined for greatness that haven't yet played a game.
For years everyone knew there were some undiscovered cricket freaks in Indian population and it was surmised that the caste system would render these people unable to get to the top.
I wonder if the IPL has contributed to illuminating this pool of talent.Like you said, get used to this dominance!
-
-
Talking of NZ cricketers getting beaten...did anyone watch the rugby v cricket T20 at Hagley oval? Rugby won easily (and took some great catches.)
Cricket team included Fleming, Astle, Mills, Harris, Marshall, Franklin, Liz Perry and others.
Rugby team included McCaw, Read, Dagg, J Barrett, B Barrett, B Mac (who was actually quite shit and dropped a sitter) Kendra Cocksedge and others.That group of guys, Hart, Wells etc did the commentary. Maybe they are better at other games, but they were not in the slightest bit funny. Or interesting. Sumo on the sidelines was good though.
-
Talking of NZ cricketers getting beaten...did anyone watch the rugby v cricket T20 at Hagley oval? Rugby won easily (and took some great catches.)
Cricket team included Fleming, Astle, Mills, Harris, Marshall, Franklin, Liz Perry and others.
Rugby team included McCaw, Read, Dagg, J Barrett, B Barrett, B Mac (who was actually quite shit and dropped a sitter) Kendra Cocksedge and others.That group of guys, Hart, Wells etc did the commentary. Maybe they are better at other games, but they were not in the slightest bit funny. Or interesting. Sumo on the sidelines was good though.
@Mokey said in Black Caps v India:
Talking of NZ cricketers getting beaten...did anyone watch the rugby v cricket T20 at Hagley oval? Rugby won easily (and took some great catches.)
Cricket team included Fleming, Astle, Mills, Harris, Marshall, Franklin, Liz Perry and others.
Rugby team included McCaw, Read, Dagg, J Barrett, B Barrett, B Mac (who was actually quite shit and dropped a sitter) Kendra Cocksedge and others.That group of guys, Hart, Wells etc did the commentary. Maybe they are better at other games, but they were not in the slightest bit funny. Or interesting. Sumo on the sidelines was good though.
Even Don Bradman got ducks sometimes....
-
I've bagged out the Indians in the past. Like, a lot. Their team was massively over-rated by their dominance at home, but then they sucked on the road.
Those days are well gone. That attack they have assembled is fucking classy. This summer, in Aus and in NZ, they have won games by regularly taking wickets throughout innings. They are able to build pressure with consistent plans; they have seamers with genuine pace; and of course the ubiquitous classy Indian spinners.
They are then backed up by a strong, if not dominant, batting lineup (led by a genuine star in Kohli) who are benefiting from the attack not putting them under too much pressure. Fuckers have learned to field as well.
It's been a nice little romp through Australasia for them this summer, and a great warm up for later in the year.
Watching yesterday it was amazing to watch two of our best ever batsmen get frustrated as the Indian's just gave them nothing.
Amazing to see an Indian team come here, take 3 times as many wickets as us, and then run down our meagre totals without anyone racking up a big score.
@mariner4life said in Black Caps v India:
I've bagged out the Indians in the past. Like, a lot. Their team was massively over-rated by their dominance at home, but then they sucked on the road.
Those days are well gone. That attack they have assembled is fucking classy. This summer, in Aus and in NZ, they have won games by regularly taking wickets throughout innings. They are able to build pressure with consistent plans; they have seamers with genuine pace; and of course the ubiquitous classy Indian spinners.
They are then backed up by a strong, if not dominant, batting lineup (led by a genuine star in Kohli) who are benefiting from the attack not putting them under too much pressure. Fuckers have learned to field as well.
It's been a nice little romp through Australasia for them this summer, and a great warm up for later in the year.
Watching yesterday it was amazing to watch two of our best ever batsmen get frustrated as the Indian's just gave them nothing.
Amazing to see an Indian team come here, take 3 times as many wickets as us, and then run down our meagre totals without anyone racking up a big score.
They've just beaten us in a home series in what is an absolute golden era for NZ cricket.
That smarts.
-
@Mokey said in Black Caps v India:
Talking of NZ cricketers getting beaten...did anyone watch the rugby v cricket T20 at Hagley oval? Rugby won easily (and took some great catches.)
Cricket team included Fleming, Astle, Mills, Harris, Marshall, Franklin, Liz Perry and others.
Rugby team included McCaw, Read, Dagg, J Barrett, B Barrett, B Mac (who was actually quite shit and dropped a sitter) Kendra Cocksedge and others.That group of guys, Hart, Wells etc did the commentary. Maybe they are better at other games, but they were not in the slightest bit funny. Or interesting. Sumo on the sidelines was good though.
Even Don Bradman got ducks sometimes....
@MN5 said in Black Caps v India:
@Mokey said in Black Caps v India:
Talking of NZ cricketers getting beaten...did anyone watch the rugby v cricket T20 at Hagley oval? Rugby won easily (and took some great catches.)
Cricket team included Fleming, Astle, Mills, Harris, Marshall, Franklin, Liz Perry and others.
Rugby team included McCaw, Read, Dagg, J Barrett, B Barrett, B Mac (who was actually quite shit and dropped a sitter) Kendra Cocksedge and others.That group of guys, Hart, Wells etc did the commentary. Maybe they are better at other games, but they were not in the slightest bit funny. Or interesting. Sumo on the sidelines was good though.
Even Don Bradman got ducks sometimes....
goddam it, as soon as i saw that i knew you would come steaming in to defend one of the least funny people in NZ. You are such a fanboy
-
@mariner4life said in Black Caps v India:
I've bagged out the Indians in the past. Like, a lot. Their team was massively over-rated by their dominance at home, but then they sucked on the road.
Those days are well gone. That attack they have assembled is fucking classy. This summer, in Aus and in NZ, they have won games by regularly taking wickets throughout innings. They are able to build pressure with consistent plans; they have seamers with genuine pace; and of course the ubiquitous classy Indian spinners.
They are then backed up by a strong, if not dominant, batting lineup (led by a genuine star in Kohli) who are benefiting from the attack not putting them under too much pressure. Fuckers have learned to field as well.
It's been a nice little romp through Australasia for them this summer, and a great warm up for later in the year.
Watching yesterday it was amazing to watch two of our best ever batsmen get frustrated as the Indian's just gave them nothing.
Amazing to see an Indian team come here, take 3 times as many wickets as us, and then run down our meagre totals without anyone racking up a big score.
They've just beaten us in a home series in what is an absolute golden era for NZ cricket.
That smarts.
@MN5 said in Black Caps v India:
@mariner4life said in Black Caps v India:
I've bagged out the Indians in the past. Like, a lot. Their team was massively over-rated by their dominance at home, but then they sucked on the road.
Those days are well gone. That attack they have assembled is fucking classy. This summer, in Aus and in NZ, they have won games by regularly taking wickets throughout innings. They are able to build pressure with consistent plans; they have seamers with genuine pace; and of course the ubiquitous classy Indian spinners.
They are then backed up by a strong, if not dominant, batting lineup (led by a genuine star in Kohli) who are benefiting from the attack not putting them under too much pressure. Fuckers have learned to field as well.
It's been a nice little romp through Australasia for them this summer, and a great warm up for later in the year.
Watching yesterday it was amazing to watch two of our best ever batsmen get frustrated as the Indian's just gave them nothing.
Amazing to see an Indian team come here, take 3 times as many wickets as us, and then run down our meagre totals without anyone racking up a big score.
They've just
beatenfucking smoked us in a home series in what is an absolute golden era for NZ cricket.That smarts.
Fixed
-
@MN5 said in Black Caps v India:
@Mokey said in Black Caps v India:
Talking of NZ cricketers getting beaten...did anyone watch the rugby v cricket T20 at Hagley oval? Rugby won easily (and took some great catches.)
Cricket team included Fleming, Astle, Mills, Harris, Marshall, Franklin, Liz Perry and others.
Rugby team included McCaw, Read, Dagg, J Barrett, B Barrett, B Mac (who was actually quite shit and dropped a sitter) Kendra Cocksedge and others.That group of guys, Hart, Wells etc did the commentary. Maybe they are better at other games, but they were not in the slightest bit funny. Or interesting. Sumo on the sidelines was good though.
Even Don Bradman got ducks sometimes....
goddam it, as soon as i saw that i knew you would come steaming in to defend one of the least funny people in NZ. You are such a fanboy
@mariner4life said in Black Caps v India:
@MN5 said in Black Caps v India:
@Mokey said in Black Caps v India:
Talking of NZ cricketers getting beaten...did anyone watch the rugby v cricket T20 at Hagley oval? Rugby won easily (and took some great catches.)
Cricket team included Fleming, Astle, Mills, Harris, Marshall, Franklin, Liz Perry and others.
Rugby team included McCaw, Read, Dagg, J Barrett, B Barrett, B Mac (who was actually quite shit and dropped a sitter) Kendra Cocksedge and others.That group of guys, Hart, Wells etc did the commentary. Maybe they are better at other games, but they were not in the slightest bit funny. Or interesting. Sumo on the sidelines was good though.
Even Don Bradman got ducks sometimes....
goddam it, as soon as i saw that i knew you would come steaming in to defend one of the least funny people in NZ. You are such a fanboy
I've learnt to ignore your opinions on many things. That is one of them.
