Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Other Cricket

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
2.0k Posts 82 Posters 128.5k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

    I am probably going to feel stupid, but how/why is Audi a nickname for Waugh?

    MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @Crazy-Horse said in Other Cricket:

    I am probably going to feel stupid, but how/why is Audi a nickname for Waugh?

    He got four ducks in a row vs Sri Lanka.

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • MN5M MN5

      @Crazy-Horse said in Other Cricket:

      I am probably going to feel stupid, but how/why is Audi a nickname for Waugh?

      He got four ducks in a row vs Sri Lanka.

      Crazy HorseC Offline
      Crazy HorseC Offline
      Crazy Horse
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      @MN5 said in Other Cricket:

      @Crazy-Horse said in Other Cricket:

      I am probably going to feel stupid, but how/why is Audi a nickname for Waugh?

      He got four ducks in a row vs Sri Lanka.

      Thanks. Between you and me, saying it's because he got four ducks didn't help me one bit. I couldn't work out what ducks had to do with Audi! Then google came to the rescue.

      I am from Christchurch.

      GodderG 1 Reply Last reply
      4
      • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

        @MN5 said in Other Cricket:

        @Crazy-Horse said in Other Cricket:

        I am probably going to feel stupid, but how/why is Audi a nickname for Waugh?

        He got four ducks in a row vs Sri Lanka.

        Thanks. Between you and me, saying it's because he got four ducks didn't help me one bit. I couldn't work out what ducks had to do with Audi! Then google came to the rescue.

        I am from Christchurch.

        GodderG Offline
        GodderG Offline
        Godder
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        @Crazy-Horse said in Other Cricket:

        @MN5 said in Other Cricket:

        @Crazy-Horse said in Other Cricket:

        I am probably going to feel stupid, but how/why is Audi a nickname for Waugh?

        He got four ducks in a row vs Sri Lanka.

        Thanks. Between you and me, saying it's because he got four ducks didn't help me one bit. I couldn't work out what ducks had to do with Audi! Then google came to the rescue.

        I am from Christchurch.

        So am I, but even I managed to work that one out... (unlike the above golden duck mistake - will just have to settle with sharing a duck in the last innings).

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mariner4lifeM Offline
          mariner4lifeM Offline
          mariner4life
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          England rolled by the Windies again on a pretty green deck.

          The ball that got Root was a beauty, as was the team catch in the slips.

          CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

            England rolled by the Windies again on a pretty green deck.

            The ball that got Root was a beauty, as was the team catch in the slips.

            CyclopsC Offline
            CyclopsC Offline
            Cyclops
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            @mariner4life said in Other Cricket:

            England rolled by the Windies again on a pretty green deck.

            The ball that got Root was a beauty, as was the team catch in the slips.

            Windies at 30 without loss at stumps. Looks a tough pitch to bat on so England aren't out of it.

            I've been enjoying this series, nice see West Indian quicks with their tails up. England played 3 wicket keepers and just as well because one has already been injured.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • KiwiPieK Offline
              KiwiPieK Offline
              KiwiPie
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              Looks like all test top orders are struggling to make runs these days. To my old fart eyes, the batting techniques are hopeless, the feet go nowhere and most batsmen can't play the moving ball.

              mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

                Looks like all test top orders are struggling to make runs these days. To my old fart eyes, the batting techniques are hopeless, the feet go nowhere and most batsmen can't play the moving ball.

                mariner4lifeM Offline
                mariner4lifeM Offline
                mariner4life
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                Looks like all test top orders are struggling to make runs these days. To my old fart eyes, the batting techniques are hopeless, the feet go nowhere and most batsmen can't play the moving ball.

                They've got more shots, but less "technique" if that makes any sense. The scourge of T20 cricket?

                It makes Kohli and Williamson stand out even more (Steve Smith is the outlier there)

                KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                  @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                  Looks like all test top orders are struggling to make runs these days. To my old fart eyes, the batting techniques are hopeless, the feet go nowhere and most batsmen can't play the moving ball.

                  They've got more shots, but less "technique" if that makes any sense. The scourge of T20 cricket?

                  It makes Kohli and Williamson stand out even more (Steve Smith is the outlier there)

                  KiwiPieK Offline
                  KiwiPieK Offline
                  KiwiPie
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  @mariner4life said in Other Cricket:

                  @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                  Looks like all test top orders are struggling to make runs these days. To my old fart eyes, the batting techniques are hopeless, the feet go nowhere and most batsmen can't play the moving ball.

                  They've got more shots, but less "technique" if that makes any sense. The scourge of T20 cricket?

                  It makes Kohli and Williamson stand out even more (Steve Smith is the outlier there)

                  Smith's technique is odd but he matches KW in that he plays the ball late - too many Guptills out there, plant the feet and swing the bat at the line of the ball (before it moves off the seam or swings late).

                  But someone like Moeen Ali ends up as a test batsmen (was batting at 3 until recently) who basically plants his feet and hits through the line. He made 50 today but that's purely due to luck - he gives the bowling side so many chances that he is never in or out of form - it just comes down to chance. He has a great eye, and can score fast .. Bairstow and Buttler are similar in that English side.

                  SiamS CyclopsC 2 Replies Last reply
                  4
                  • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

                    @mariner4life said in Other Cricket:

                    @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                    Looks like all test top orders are struggling to make runs these days. To my old fart eyes, the batting techniques are hopeless, the feet go nowhere and most batsmen can't play the moving ball.

                    They've got more shots, but less "technique" if that makes any sense. The scourge of T20 cricket?

                    It makes Kohli and Williamson stand out even more (Steve Smith is the outlier there)

                    Smith's technique is odd but he matches KW in that he plays the ball late - too many Guptills out there, plant the feet and swing the bat at the line of the ball (before it moves off the seam or swings late).

                    But someone like Moeen Ali ends up as a test batsmen (was batting at 3 until recently) who basically plants his feet and hits through the line. He made 50 today but that's purely due to luck - he gives the bowling side so many chances that he is never in or out of form - it just comes down to chance. He has a great eye, and can score fast .. Bairstow and Buttler are similar in that English side.

                    SiamS Offline
                    SiamS Offline
                    Siam
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    @KiwiPie Trescothick defied all technical logic for a fine record too

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

                      @mariner4life said in Other Cricket:

                      @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                      Looks like all test top orders are struggling to make runs these days. To my old fart eyes, the batting techniques are hopeless, the feet go nowhere and most batsmen can't play the moving ball.

                      They've got more shots, but less "technique" if that makes any sense. The scourge of T20 cricket?

                      It makes Kohli and Williamson stand out even more (Steve Smith is the outlier there)

                      Smith's technique is odd but he matches KW in that he plays the ball late - too many Guptills out there, plant the feet and swing the bat at the line of the ball (before it moves off the seam or swings late).

                      But someone like Moeen Ali ends up as a test batsmen (was batting at 3 until recently) who basically plants his feet and hits through the line. He made 50 today but that's purely due to luck - he gives the bowling side so many chances that he is never in or out of form - it just comes down to chance. He has a great eye, and can score fast .. Bairstow and Buttler are similar in that English side.

                      CyclopsC Offline
                      CyclopsC Offline
                      Cyclops
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                      @mariner4life said in Other Cricket:

                      @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                      Looks like all test top orders are struggling to make runs these days. To my old fart eyes, the batting techniques are hopeless, the feet go nowhere and most batsmen can't play the moving ball.

                      They've got more shots, but less "technique" if that makes any sense. The scourge of T20 cricket?

                      It makes Kohli and Williamson stand out even more (Steve Smith is the outlier there)

                      Smith's technique is odd but he matches KW in that he plays the ball late - too many Guptills out there, plant the feet and swing the bat at the line of the ball (before it moves off the seam or swings late).

                      But someone like Moeen Ali ends up as a test batsmen (was batting at 3 until recently) who basically plants his feet and hits through the line. He made 50 today but that's purely due to luck - he gives the bowling side so many chances that he is never in or out of form - it just comes down to chance. He has a great eye, and can score fast .. Bairstow and Buttler are similar in that English side.

                      I'm not sure what you're including in these day but a decade ago or maybe more we had journalists breathlessly exhorting the declining importance of footwork as Sehwag plundered triple and double tons with a stand and deliver approach. The second coming of Matthew Hayden was similar.

                      I feel like there was a period from the late nineties until recently where pitches got better for batting, there weren't many elite swing bowlers (as everyone chased express pace bowlers and mystery spinners) and batting averages crept up while technique declined. Perhaps that's what is causing the decline in averages now as some elite bowlers have popped up and there's a reaction to flat decks.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • MN5M Online
                        MN5M Online
                        MN5
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        Windies wrap up the Poms....

                        Whisper it quietly but they might be on the way back.

                        Also Jason Holder is now test crickets number one all rounder. First time someone from the Windies has been there since Gary Sobers in 1974 which surprised me a bit. I guess all their legends are generally very much batsmen or bowlers. Not both.

                        Good on him though, he's come a long way since Adam Voges padded his average to ridiculous levels against a terrible WI team.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • DonsteppaD Offline
                          DonsteppaD Offline
                          Donsteppa
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25

                          Would love to see (and be slightly scared by πŸ™‚ ) the West Indies rising again. After growing up on the 86/87 version an onwards, watching their decline was disappointing.

                          canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • DonsteppaD Donsteppa

                            Would love to see (and be slightly scared by πŸ™‚ ) the West Indies rising again. After growing up on the 86/87 version an onwards, watching their decline was disappointing.

                            canefanC Offline
                            canefanC Offline
                            canefan
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #26

                            @Donsteppa said in Other Cricket:

                            Would love to see (and be slightly scared by πŸ™‚ ) the West Indies rising again. After growing up on the 86/87 version an onwards, watching their decline was disappointing.

                            The Holding-Ambrose-Richards WI were fearsome and the most exciting cricket team on the planet. They seemed to have a conveyor belt of quicks back then

                            MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • canefanC canefan

                              @Donsteppa said in Other Cricket:

                              Would love to see (and be slightly scared by πŸ™‚ ) the West Indies rising again. After growing up on the 86/87 version an onwards, watching their decline was disappointing.

                              The Holding-Ambrose-Richards WI were fearsome and the most exciting cricket team on the planet. They seemed to have a conveyor belt of quicks back then

                              MN5M Online
                              MN5M Online
                              MN5
                              wrote on last edited by MN5
                              #27

                              @canefan said in Other Cricket:

                              @Donsteppa said in Other Cricket:

                              Would love to see (and be slightly scared by πŸ™‚ ) the West Indies rising again. After growing up on the 86/87 version an onwards, watching their decline was disappointing.

                              The Holding-Ambrose-Richards WI were fearsome and the most exciting cricket team on the planet. They seemed to have a conveyor belt of quicks back then

                              Pedantic alert.

                              Did Ambrose and Richards/Holding play together at all ? Don't think so....

                              Yes trying to pick their four best ever quicks would be hard work.

                              I'd maybe go Marshall, Ambrose, Holding, Garner.....

                              Loads of fucken good others miss out.

                              SynicBastS 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • MN5M MN5

                                @canefan said in Other Cricket:

                                @Donsteppa said in Other Cricket:

                                Would love to see (and be slightly scared by πŸ™‚ ) the West Indies rising again. After growing up on the 86/87 version an onwards, watching their decline was disappointing.

                                The Holding-Ambrose-Richards WI were fearsome and the most exciting cricket team on the planet. They seemed to have a conveyor belt of quicks back then

                                Pedantic alert.

                                Did Ambrose and Richards/Holding play together at all ? Don't think so....

                                Yes trying to pick their four best ever quicks would be hard work.

                                I'd maybe go Marshall, Ambrose, Holding, Garner.....

                                Loads of fucken good others miss out.

                                SynicBastS Offline
                                SynicBastS Offline
                                SynicBast
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                @MN5 said in Other Cricket:

                                @canefan said in Other Cricket:

                                @Donsteppa said in Other Cricket:

                                Would love to see (and be slightly scared by πŸ™‚ ) the West Indies rising again. After growing up on the 86/87 version an onwards, watching their decline was disappointing.

                                The Holding-Ambrose-Richards WI were fearsome and the most exciting cricket team on the planet. They seemed to have a conveyor belt of quicks back then

                                Pedantic alert.

                                Did Ambrose and Richards/Holding play together at all ? Don't think so....

                                Yes trying to pick their four best ever quicks would be hard work.

                                I'd maybe go Marshall, Ambrose, Holding, Garner.....

                                Loads of fucken good others miss out.

                                Holdng played form 1975 - 1987
                                Ambrose from 1988-2000
                                Garner from 1977-1987
                                Marshall 1978-1991

                                for me the windies from 1975 - 1983 were lethal:

                                Andy Roberts, Michael Holding, Joel Garner and Malcolm Marshall plus the real nasties like Croft, Clarke, Patterson and the rest of the conveyor belt
                                Then the batting - Greenidge, Haynes, Kallicharan, Richards, Lloyd - 3 of those 5 could tear the game away from you on their own.

                                The second phase of WI team is awesome yet not as explosive in batting or bowling

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                4
                                • H Offline
                                  H Offline
                                  hydro11
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #29

                                  English batting looks incredibly weak. If Root isn't scoring runs, who can they rely on. Ashes will be interesting.

                                  KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • H hydro11

                                    English batting looks incredibly weak. If Root isn't scoring runs, who can they rely on. Ashes will be interesting.

                                    KiwiPieK Offline
                                    KiwiPieK Offline
                                    KiwiPie
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #30

                                    @hydro11 said in Other Cricket:

                                    English batting looks incredibly weak. If Root isn't scoring runs, who can they rely on. Ashes will be interesting.

                                    Saw a stat that England have averaged losing a wicket every 32 balls in this series - 32? So the Windies quicks don't even have to bowl long spells and the wickets keep falling.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • Chris B.C Offline
                                      Chris B.C Offline
                                      Chris B.
                                      wrote on last edited by Chris B.
                                      #31

                                      Watch Holding bowling to Brian Close - especially the bouncer that nearly takes his head off at 1.30.

                                      I think I'd rather be Brian O'Driscoll!

                                      MN5M KiwiPieK 2 Replies Last reply
                                      1
                                      • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                        Watch Holding bowling to Brian Close - especially the bouncer that nearly takes his head off at 1.30.

                                        I think I'd rather be Brian O'Driscoll!

                                        MN5M Online
                                        MN5M Online
                                        MN5
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #32

                                        @Chris-B said in Other Cricket:

                                        Watch Holding bowling to Brian Close - especially the bouncer that nearly takes his head off at 1.30.

                                        I think I'd rather be Brian O'Driscoll!

                                        Haha. Fucken hell Tony Grieg....bit of a brain explosion there pal.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • Crazy HorseC Offline
                                          Crazy HorseC Offline
                                          Crazy Horse
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #33

                                          I recall watching Canterbury at the Rangiora Domain many years ago. Canterbury's opening bowlers? Holding and Hadlee. Pretty sure Hick was in the opposition that day too.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search