Black Caps v India
-
Hotspot shows mark but snicko didn't show anything until the ball hit the pads. Smithy suggesting hotspot may have been there before the ball passed the bat but consensus is it was a mistake
-
-
I find Santner annoying. Not talking about his ability but his mannerisms. That lanky walk while looking down, the way he doesn't jump when he bowls, and now those silly glasses he wears while batting.
-
I find Santner annoying. Not talking about his ability but his mannerisms. That lanky walk while looking down, the way he doesn't jump when he bowls, and now those silly glasses he wears while batting.
@Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v India:
I find Santner annoying. Not talking about his ability but his mannerisms. That lanky walk while looking down, the way he doesn't jump when he bowls, and now those silly glasses he wears while batting.
7 off 8 balls is an amazing effort when your supposed to be scoring 10+ runs each over,.
-
I’m watching this on replay and have just seen the fucking shambles of a decision on the Mitchell dismissal.
I’m in disbelief how an umpire can misinterpret the technology so bloody badly.
It’s a bloody farce.What is the point in having hotspot if you’re not going to take any notice of it?
That useless prick they call an umpire must be the only one on the planet that thought that was out.
-
I’m watching this on replay and have just seen the fucking shambles of a decision on the Mitchell dismissal.
I’m in disbelief how an umpire can misinterpret the technology so bloody badly.
It’s a bloody farce.What is the point in having hotspot if you’re not going to take any notice of it?
That useless prick they call an umpire must be the only one on the planet that thought that was out.
@Gunner said in Black Caps v India:
I’m watching this on replay and have just seen the fucking shambles of a decision on the Mitchell dismissal.
I’m in disbelief how an umpire can misinterpret the technology so bloody badly.
It’s a bloody farce.What is the point in having hotspot if you’re not going to take any notice of it?
That useless prick they call an umpire must be the only one on the planet that thought that was out.
I dunno - I don't think it was all that clear that the ball hit the bat was it? That very light mark could just as easily have been from contact with the pad. The way the ball looked to deviate it certainly seemed so on the front on first viewing, but maybe that was just a trick of the camera? There was not even a glimmer on snicko.
-
I’m obviously still behind, but catching up.
That innings was bloody awful by the Caps, but India’s bowling, how good?
Can anyone tell me why bloody Santner get to bat ahead of Kuggelijn and even Southee with only 5 overs to go?
He looks so bloody awkward and looks like he’s struggling just to pick up the singles.We haven’t got anywhere near enough runs. India will chase this down in a canter.
-
I’m obviously still behind, but catching up.
That innings was bloody awful by the Caps, but India’s bowling, how good?
Can anyone tell me why bloody Santner get to bat ahead of Kuggelijn and even Southee with only 5 overs to go?
He looks so bloody awkward and looks like he’s struggling just to pick up the singles.We haven’t got anywhere near enough runs. India will chase this down in a canter.
@Gunner said in Black Caps v India:
I’m obviously still behind, but catching up.
That innings was bloody awful by the Caps, but India’s bowling, how good?
Can anyone tell me why bloody Santner get to bat ahead of Kuggelijn and even Southee with only 5 overs to go?
He looks so bloody awkward and looks like he’s struggling just to pick up the singles.We haven’t got anywhere near enough runs. India will chase this down in a canter.
Pressure from Gilette?
