• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
9.4k Posts 86 Posters 1.3m Views
Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #7184

    @canefan said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @RLx31 said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Nepia said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @RLx31 you leave to fight for a cause that is against 'your country', you lose your rights as a citizen of that country, seems pretty simple.
    

    Simple and wrong. I don't agree that people should be made stateless. Besides, what if you're fighting the "good fight"?

    Yeah, I was thinking that, what if someone left to fight for a pro Assad militia against ISIS - they're fighting for the 'enemy' against the other 'enemy'.

    I'd suggest that if they wanted to make a difference for their own country (UK for example) they join the forces here instead. If their interests are not in favour of their own country and supporting whichever enemy then they don't belong here.

    I really believe that the UK needs too be brave and make this decision, we've been to flimsy for too long and maybe some shocking decisions need to be made now for the greater good of their own citizens who aren't running off joining terrorist groups.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/110756734/us-to-alabama-woman-who-joined-islamic-state-dont-come-back

    The US look to try to be in step with the UK on this

    @canefan oh @canefan !
    alt text

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #7185

    @RLx31 Enjoy it mate. I'm sure you will calm down in time

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #7186

    @canefan Got it out of my system, I will gif responsibly. Fernies not fans of GIFs ay??

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #7187

    @RLx31 said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @canefan Got it out of my system, I will gif responsibly. Fernies not fans of GIFs ay??

    Nah it's all good. Just not on the politicos threads. Only adult behaviour allowed!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #7188

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Nepia said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @RLx31 you leave to fight for a cause that is against 'your country', you lose your rights as a citizen of that country, seems pretty simple.
    

    Simple and wrong. I don't agree that people should be made stateless. Besides, what if you're fighting the "good fight"?

    Yeah, I was thinking that, what if someone left to fight for a pro Assad militia against ISIS - they're fighting for the 'enemy' against the other 'enemy'.

    What part of "against your country" was so hard to grasp there?

    I'll give you a clue; Saefkow-Jacob-Bästlein Organization, Ehrenfeld Group, Free France, Resistance, etc.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #7189

    @Kirwan said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    The only alternative IMO is to let her come back in and spend life in prison for Treason.

    I'd be happy with that. Charge her with a relevant crime and act like a civilised society.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #7190

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Nepia said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @RLx31 you leave to fight for a cause that is against 'your country', you lose your rights as a citizen of that country, seems pretty simple.
    

    Simple and wrong. I don't agree that people should be made stateless. Besides, what if you're fighting the "good fight"?

    Yeah, I was thinking that, what if someone left to fight for a pro Assad militia against ISIS - they're fighting for the 'enemy' against the other 'enemy'.

    What part of "against your country" was so hard to grasp there?

    I'll give you a clue; Saefkow-Jacob-Bästlein Organization, Ehrenfeld Group, Free France, Resistance, etc.

    Erm, how does that relate to fighting for Assad against ISIS? At any rate it's a bit strange to compare resistance groups in dictatorships and occupied countries with stable western democracies.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to antipodean on last edited by taniwharugby
    #7191

    @antipodean yeah nah, if those cnuts that have left NZ to fight FOR ISIS against Kiwi troops, Allies and interests want to come back, they can fuck right off, this act is enough to show they do not value thier citizenship; passport should be cancelled, go live in the desert!

    Why should our tax payer pay $100k a year to house them in prison?

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #7192

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Nepia said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @RLx31 you leave to fight for a cause that is against 'your country', you lose your rights as a citizen of that country, seems pretty simple.
    

    Simple and wrong. I don't agree that people should be made stateless. Besides, what if you're fighting the "good fight"?

    Yeah, I was thinking that, what if someone left to fight for a pro Assad militia against ISIS - they're fighting for the 'enemy' against the other 'enemy'.

    What part of "against your country" was so hard to grasp there?

    I'll give you a clue; Saefkow-Jacob-Bästlein Organization, Ehrenfeld Group, Free France, Resistance, etc.

    Erm, how does that relate to fighting for Assad against ISIS?

    England wasn't for Assad was it? It was in the position of wanting both sides to lose.

    Calls to make people stateless are an insane response to one of your citizens doing something you don't like. It should be up to the individual if they wish to renounce citizenship. I also don't agree with States arbitrarily removing citizenship from people who are natural born citizens just because there's somewhere else they might be able to seek citizenship from.

    Once you head down that path there will invariably be calls to apply it to some other moral panic.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #7193

    @taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean yeah nah, if those cnuts that have left NZ to fight FOR ISIS against Kiwi troops, Allies and interests want to come back, they can fuck right off, passport should be cancelled, go live in the desert!

    Why should our tax payer pay $100k a year to house them in prison?

    Because they're New Zealanders who committed a crime?

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #7194

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Nepia said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @RLx31 you leave to fight for a cause that is against 'your country', you lose your rights as a citizen of that country, seems pretty simple.
    

    Simple and wrong. I don't agree that people should be made stateless. Besides, what if you're fighting the "good fight"?

    Yeah, I was thinking that, what if someone left to fight for a pro Assad militia against ISIS - they're fighting for the 'enemy' against the other 'enemy'.

    What part of "against your country" was so hard to grasp there?

    I'll give you a clue; Saefkow-Jacob-Bästlein Organization, Ehrenfeld Group, Free France, Resistance, etc.

    Erm, how does that relate to fighting for Assad against ISIS?

    England wasn't for Assad was it? It was in the position of wanting both sides to lose.

    Calls to make people stateless are an insane response to one of your citizens doing something you don't like. It should be up to the individual if they wish to renounce citizenship. I also don't agree with States arbitrarily removing citizenship from people who are natural born citizens just because there's somewhere else they might be able to seek citizenship from.

    Once you head down that path there will invariably be calls to apply it to some other moral panic.

    Well I think we'll have to agree to disagree on that one. As far as I'm concerned, in this day and age and if you live in a stable western democracy you forfeit your right to citizenship in that country if you take up arms or provide support through other means for a country or movement that seeks to harm or destroy that country. Screw the taxpayer having to foot the bill for them to rot in jail for life. If they can't be let out into the community then why let them into the country if you don't have to.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #7195

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Nepia said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @RLx31 you leave to fight for a cause that is against 'your country', you lose your rights as a citizen of that country, seems pretty simple.
    

    Simple and wrong. I don't agree that people should be made stateless. Besides, what if you're fighting the "good fight"?

    Yeah, I was thinking that, what if someone left to fight for a pro Assad militia against ISIS - they're fighting for the 'enemy' against the other 'enemy'.

    What part of "against your country" was so hard to grasp there?

    I'll give you a clue; Saefkow-Jacob-Bästlein Organization, Ehrenfeld Group, Free France, Resistance, etc.

    Erm, how does that relate to fighting for Assad against ISIS?

    England wasn't for Assad was it? It was in the position of wanting both sides to lose.

    Calls to make people stateless are an insane response to one of your citizens doing something you don't like. It should be up to the individual if they wish to renounce citizenship. I also don't agree with States arbitrarily removing citizenship from people who are natural born citizens just because there's somewhere else they might be able to seek citizenship from.

    Once you head down that path there will invariably be calls to apply it to some other moral panic.

    Well I think we'll have to agree to disagree on that one. As far as I'm concerned, in this day and age and if you live in a stable western democracy you forfeit your right to citizenship in that country if you take up arms or provide support through other means for a country or movement that seeks to harm or destroy that country.

    What business did England have in Syria? See the problem?

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #7196

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Nepia said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @RLx31 you leave to fight for a cause that is against 'your country', you lose your rights as a citizen of that country, seems pretty simple.
    

    Simple and wrong. I don't agree that people should be made stateless. Besides, what if you're fighting the "good fight"?

    Yeah, I was thinking that, what if someone left to fight for a pro Assad militia against ISIS - they're fighting for the 'enemy' against the other 'enemy'.

    What part of "against your country" was so hard to grasp there?

    I'll give you a clue; Saefkow-Jacob-Bästlein Organization, Ehrenfeld Group, Free France, Resistance, etc.

    Erm, how does that relate to fighting for Assad against ISIS?

    England wasn't for Assad was it? It was in the position of wanting both sides to lose.

    Calls to make people stateless are an insane response to one of your citizens doing something you don't like. It should be up to the individual if they wish to renounce citizenship. I also don't agree with States arbitrarily removing citizenship from people who are natural born citizens just because there's somewhere else they might be able to seek citizenship from.

    Once you head down that path there will invariably be calls to apply it to some other moral panic.

    Well I think we'll have to agree to disagree on that one. As far as I'm concerned, in this day and age and if you live in a stable western democracy you forfeit your right to citizenship in that country if you take up arms or provide support through other means for a country or movement that seeks to harm or destroy that country.

    What business did England have in Syria? See the problem?

    Sorry what?

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #7197

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Nepia said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @RLx31 you leave to fight for a cause that is against 'your country', you lose your rights as a citizen of that country, seems pretty simple.
    

    Simple and wrong. I don't agree that people should be made stateless. Besides, what if you're fighting the "good fight"?

    Yeah, I was thinking that, what if someone left to fight for a pro Assad militia against ISIS - they're fighting for the 'enemy' against the other 'enemy'.

    What part of "against your country" was so hard to grasp there?

    I'll give you a clue; Saefkow-Jacob-Bästlein Organization, Ehrenfeld Group, Free France, Resistance, etc.

    Erm, how does that relate to fighting for Assad against ISIS?

    England wasn't for Assad was it? It was in the position of wanting both sides to lose.

    Calls to make people stateless are an insane response to one of your citizens doing something you don't like. It should be up to the individual if they wish to renounce citizenship. I also don't agree with States arbitrarily removing citizenship from people who are natural born citizens just because there's somewhere else they might be able to seek citizenship from.

    Once you head down that path there will invariably be calls to apply it to some other moral panic.

    Well I think we'll have to agree to disagree on that one. As far as I'm concerned, in this day and age and if you live in a stable western democracy you forfeit your right to citizenship in that country if you take up arms or provide support through other means for a country or movement that seeks to harm or destroy that country.

    What business did England have in Syria? See the problem?

    Sorry what?

    Didn't realise I needed to spell it out. She was in another sovereign country that was engaged in civil war. Not in East London making pipe bombs.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to antipodean on last edited by taniwharugby
    #7198

    @antipodean

    Treason: The crime of betraying ones country

    IMO this is far different to robbing a petrol station.

    If a NZ citizen commited an act of terror in the name of ISIS in NZ (and didnt kill themselves in the act) then by all means, lock em away, throw away the key, or, give them the option for a 1 way trip to Somalia or some other shithole.

    I'm with @Rancid-Schnitzel we'll just have to agree to disagree, you aint gonna change my view, like me with you.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #7199

    @taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean
    Treason: The crime of betraying ones country

    As it turns out, treason is a crime in New Zealand.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #7200

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Nepia said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @taniwharugby said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @RLx31 you leave to fight for a cause that is against 'your country', you lose your rights as a citizen of that country, seems pretty simple.
    

    Simple and wrong. I don't agree that people should be made stateless. Besides, what if you're fighting the "good fight"?

    Yeah, I was thinking that, what if someone left to fight for a pro Assad militia against ISIS - they're fighting for the 'enemy' against the other 'enemy'.

    What part of "against your country" was so hard to grasp there?

    I'll give you a clue; Saefkow-Jacob-Bästlein Organization, Ehrenfeld Group, Free France, Resistance, etc.

    Erm, how does that relate to fighting for Assad against ISIS?

    England wasn't for Assad was it? It was in the position of wanting both sides to lose.

    Calls to make people stateless are an insane response to one of your citizens doing something you don't like. It should be up to the individual if they wish to renounce citizenship. I also don't agree with States arbitrarily removing citizenship from people who are natural born citizens just because there's somewhere else they might be able to seek citizenship from.

    Once you head down that path there will invariably be calls to apply it to some other moral panic.

    Well I think we'll have to agree to disagree on that one. As far as I'm concerned, in this day and age and if you live in a stable western democracy you forfeit your right to citizenship in that country if you take up arms or provide support through other means for a country or movement that seeks to harm or destroy that country.

    What business did England have in Syria? See the problem?

    Sorry what?

    Didn't realise I needed to spell it out. She was in another sovereign country that was engaged in civil war. Not in East London making pipe bombs.

    And she joined a state (or whatever you want to call it) that was waging war against the West and has committed acts of terrorism to prove it. It's one thing if she joined what was exclusively a resistance movement against Assad, but that was most certainly not the case. Are you seriously suggesting that her motivation to join ISIS was to take out Assad?

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #7201

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    And she joined a state (or whatever you want to call it) that was waging war against the West and has committed acts of terrorism to prove it.

    If only the UK had passed some legislation dealing with terrorism.

    Rancid SchnitzelR DonsteppaD 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #7202

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    And she joined a state (or whatever you want to call it) that was waging war against the West and has committed acts of terrorism to prove it.

    If only the UK had passed some legislation dealing with terrorism.

    So do you think she went to Syria because she wanted to take out Assad?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #7203

    @antipodean said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz:

    And she joined a state (or whatever you want to call it) that was waging war against the West and has committed acts of terrorism to prove it.

    If only the UK had passed some legislation dealing with terrorism.

    Or if only they'd passed some legislation dealing with removal of citizenship.

    (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/61)

    1 Reply Last reply
    3

Alternative needed from the absolute crap of stuff.co.nz
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.