• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
353 Posts 34 Posters 8.6k Views
New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    wrote on last edited by
    #136

    I've really been disappointed in the Bangles, they seem to have gone back to how they were when they first came into test cricket. They miss Shakib al Hasan as he is a class player with both bat and ball.

    Quiz question to fill up the remainder of the day - list all of the NZ batsmen to have made a test hundred since the start of 2010. There are 18 in total.

    I'll give you Kane, Taylor, Latham, Watling, Nicholls - 13 to go.

    SneakdefreakS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SneakdefreakS Offline
    SneakdefreakS Offline
    Sneakdefreak
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #137

    @KiwiPie said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    I've really been disappointed in the Bangles, they seem to have gone back to how they were when they first came into test cricket. They miss Shakib al Hasan as he is a class player with both bat and ball.

    Quiz question to fill up the remainder of the day - list all of the NZ batsmen to have made a test hundred since the start of 2010. There are 18 in total.

    I'll give you Kane, Taylor, Latham, Watling, Nicholls - 13 to go.

    McCullum, Blundell....

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #138

    Already Provided: Kane, Taylor, Latham, Watling, Nicholls,McCullum, Blundell

    Adding Jeet Raval, Guptill?, Rutherford?

    Potentially ten so far

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    wrote on last edited by
    #139

    @Hooroo said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Already Provided: Kane, Taylor, Latham, Watling, Nicholls,McCullum, Blundell
    Adding Jeet Raval, Guptill?, Rutherford?

    All correct - 10 down and 8 to go.

    Thought Blundell might catch a few.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #140
    This post is deleted!
    PaekakboyzP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #141

    Plus the Neesh

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by Hooroo
    #142

    Already Provided: Kane, Taylor, Latham, Watling, Nicholls,McCullum, Blundell, Jeet Raval, Guptill, Rutherford, Neesham
    Adding CDG

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Do not disturb
    V Do not disturb
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by Virgil
    #143

    @Hooroo said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Already Provided: Kane, Taylor, Latham, Watling, Nicholls,McCullum, Blundell, Jeet Raval, Guptill, Rutherford, Neesham
    Adding CDG

    2M Peter?

    So hard not to cheat!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SneakdefreakS Offline
    SneakdefreakS Offline
    Sneakdefreak
    wrote on last edited by Sneakdefreak
    #144

    Vettori? Anderson?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #145

    Only @KiwiPie can confirm!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Do not disturb
    V Do not disturb
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #146

    Jesse Ryder!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Sneakdefreak on last edited by canefan
    #147

    @Sneakdefreak said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Wagner and Boult finish off the Bang Bros

    Someone's mixing their porn and sports lexicons together

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SneakdefreakS Offline
    SneakdefreakS Offline
    Sneakdefreak
    wrote on last edited by
    #148

    Someone average like Dean Brownlie or Jamie How probably nabbed a century against a lesser team.

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Sneakdefreak on last edited by
    #149

    @Sneakdefreak said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Someone average like Dean Brownlie or Jamie How probably nabbed a century against a lesser team.

    Good call on Brownlie. How didn't play this decade.

    By my estimation you have 17 of 18 - good work. Who can name the 18th first?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #150

    Tim Macintosh?

    KiwiPieK SneakdefreakS 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #151

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Tim Macintosh?

    That's the man. All over ....

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #152

    Taylor MoM but I reckon Wagner woulda been a shout if he got a michelle in the first innings.

    I know you're only as good as who's in front of you in one sense but still a terrific effort to smash the absolute living shit out of them in such a short period of time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • SneakdefreakS Offline
    SneakdefreakS Offline
    Sneakdefreak
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #153

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Tim Macintosh?

    That sounds like a made-up name from Brian Lara Cricket on the Sega Megadrive.....

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    wrote on last edited by
    #154

    Next question - this will see us through to close of play

    Name an NZ Test XI of the players with the highest batting average in each position in the batting order. Min requirements - 10 games in that batting position (according to what StatsGuru says).

    You must name all 11. The person who gets the most players in the correct position (correct player in incorrect position does not count) wins - getting all 11 is very tough without cheating. (2 openers can be named in either order)

    Go!

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #155

    I will suck at this but...

    1. Latham
    2. Wright
    3. Williamson
    4. Taylor
    5. Rutherford (K)
    6. McCullum
    7. Watling
    8. Hadlee
    9. Southee
    10. Vettorri
    11. Boult

    Without telling who or position, can you just say how may are correct (assuming I have at least 1 correct)

    I always do these and then when I see others reply, I'm like, Of Course!!!!

    KiwiPieK MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    0

New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.