• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
353 Posts 34 Posters 8.6k Views
New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #332

    @Chris-B said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    Shite!

    Harry and Parore

    Now you can concentrate on the tests ....

    1. Taylor and Kane 65 partnerships, Average 54.68, 8 x 100s
    2. Wright and Edgar 60 partnerships, Average 31.42, 1 x 100s

    ODIS

    1. Fleming and Astle 118 partnerships, Average 33.16, 9 x 100s
    2. Guptill and Kane 65 partnerships, Average 46.57, 7 x 100s
    3. Guptill and McCullum 64 partnerships, Average 45.61, 8 x 100s
    4. Harris and Parore 63 partnerships, Average 18.93, 0 x 100s
    5. Taylor and Kane 61 partnerships, Average 56.46, 12 x 100s, 26 run outs (#madeupstats)
    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #333
    This post is deleted!
    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #334
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #335

    What about Flem and Astle in tests?

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #336

    @KiwiPie Thank goodness for that - I rapidly was running out of possibilities!

    OK - three goes...

    Wright and Crowe
    Fleming and Styris
    And one from further back - someone with Bevan Congdon - maybe Turner?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #337

    congdon and Vivian or Hastings maybe

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #338

    Actually can that we doidnt play enough tests in those days

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #339

    @dogmeat Pretty sure Congdon played quite a lot of tests over a long period. Whether anyone else played enough with him is a pertinent question. Turner might have if he didn't become a professional.

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #340

    @Cyclops said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    What about Flem and Astle in tests?

    Well done, 3rd on the list - a 12 year span. Both 4 and 5 are more recent.

    1. Taylor and Kane 65 partnerships, Average 54.68, 8 x 100s
    2. Wright and Edgar 60 partnerships, Average 31.42, 1 x 100s
    3. Astle and Fleming 58 partnerships, Average 33.63, 2 x 100s

    ODIS

    1. Fleming and Astle 118 partnerships, Average 33.16, 9 x 100s
    2. Guptill and Kane 65 partnerships, Average 46.57, 7 x 100s
    3. Guptill and McCullum 64 partnerships, Average 45.61, 8 x 100s
    4. Harris and Parore 63 partnerships, Average 18.93, 0 x 100s
    5. Taylor and Kane 61 partnerships, Average 56.46, 12 x 100s, 26 run outs (#madeupstats)
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #341

    @Chris-B said in New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2:

    @dogmeat Pretty sure Congdon played quite a lot of tests over a long period. Whether anyone else played enough with him is a pertinent question. Turner might have if he didn't become a professional.

    Congdon and Turner is 7th in tests - 36 times. From then it is Dowling, Burgess, Hastings

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #342

    watling and Taylor
    Baz and Watling
    Kane and Watling

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #343

    McCullum and Vettori?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #344

    Watling and Vettori?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    wrote on last edited by
    #345

    Better wrap this one up ....

    Taylor and Kane 65 partnerships, Average 54.68, 8 x 100s
    Wright and Edgar 60 partnerships, Average 31.42, 1 x 100s
    Astle and Fleming 58 partnerships, Average 33.63, 2 x 100s
    Latham and Williamson 40 partnerships, Average 51.12, 7 x 100s
    McCullum and Taylor 39 partnerships, Average 38.71, 3 x 100s

    ODIS

    Fleming and Astle 118 partnerships, Average 33.16, 9 x 100s
    Guptill and Kane 65 partnerships, Average 46.57, 7 x 100s
    Guptill and McCullum 64 partnerships, Average 45.61, 8 x 100s
    Harris and Parore 63 partnerships, Average 18.93, 0 x 100s
    Taylor and Kane 61 partnerships, Average 56.46, 12 x 100s, 26 run outs (#madeupstats)

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #346

    @KiwiPie Thanks, that was fun.

    Those stats have a bit to say about the benefits of consistency of selection and the talent in our current batting group.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #347

    In some ways I'm a little surprised that Kane and Ross only have 65 partnerships (tests).

    They've been in the team together for 9 years now (that's only 7.2 partnerships per year).

    Not making any particular point, just an observation.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #348

    Seeing Latham and Williamson's average together has made me interested in how our partnerships are performing.

    Latham-Raval average 38
    Williamson-Latham and -Raval are both 50+
    Taylor-Williamson is 50+, -Latham is 48 -Raval under 30
    Nicholls-Latham is 96, - Raval is 33, -Williamson is 41, -Taylor is 53

    Obviously some of those are very small samples (although Latham-Nicholls have 3 hundred stands from 6 attempts).

    Overall, it emphasises the class of Kane, but also Latham, Taylor and Nicholls. It means we average almost 100 on the board before Taylor comes into bat which must be a nice change for him.

    Raval comes out looking a bit poor in this! He's the common factor in all the partnerships under 40, but part of that will be because of the small sample and probably also partly because he's had trouble converting starts, so those lower partnerships will be more commonly because we're collapsing rather than because he's racking up a Lathamesque big ton.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    wrote on last edited by Paekakboyz
    #349

    How cool is this!!!

    https://www.facebook.com/CrickShouts/videos/291262628436007/UzpfSTExMTExMzkwMjMxMDQ2MDoyMTQ0MjMxMTYyMzMyMDQ3/

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Paekakboyz on last edited by
    #350

    @Paekakboyz That was mesmerizing!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #351

    I know right, it was trippy when it hit 2012/13ish and everything stopped till the new bloods came ripping through. Far out Sangakara got work done in his final years!

    Had totally forgotten or missed that Lara started after Tendulkar!! I guess kicking your career off at 16 gets you a decent head start!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

New Zealand v Bangladesh Test #2
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.